“你是什么人,(如果你是人的话)”——斯宾塞和西尔维娅·温特

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Spenser Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1086/722424
Kat Addis
{"title":"“你是什么人,(如果你是人的话)”——斯宾塞和西尔维娅·温特","authors":"Kat Addis","doi":"10.1086/722424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay reaches toward thinking Spenser with Sylvia Wynter in two stages. In the first stage, I read Spenser’s use of the terms “inhumanitie” and “humanity” in The Faerie Queene in relation to Briana, Crudor, and the “salvage man.” Spenser’s use of these terms, I suggest, enacts and illustrates Wynter’s theory of the overrepresentation of Man as the human. In the second stage, thinking alongside Wynter’s emancipatory thrust toward, in David Scott’s terms, the “re-enchantment of humanism,” I reconsider what it might mean to be deposited on the edges of the poem’s allegorical scheme. If figures like the “bear-baby” and Gryll can be thought of as human but not on Man’s terms, they not only reveal the limits of Man’s imaginary but also demand an alternative poetry of the human.","PeriodicalId":39606,"journal":{"name":"Spenser Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“What art thou man, (if man at all thou art)”: Spenser with Sylvia Wynter\",\"authors\":\"Kat Addis\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/722424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay reaches toward thinking Spenser with Sylvia Wynter in two stages. In the first stage, I read Spenser’s use of the terms “inhumanitie” and “humanity” in The Faerie Queene in relation to Briana, Crudor, and the “salvage man.” Spenser’s use of these terms, I suggest, enacts and illustrates Wynter’s theory of the overrepresentation of Man as the human. In the second stage, thinking alongside Wynter’s emancipatory thrust toward, in David Scott’s terms, the “re-enchantment of humanism,” I reconsider what it might mean to be deposited on the edges of the poem’s allegorical scheme. If figures like the “bear-baby” and Gryll can be thought of as human but not on Man’s terms, they not only reveal the limits of Man’s imaginary but also demand an alternative poetry of the human.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spenser Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spenser Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/722424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spenser Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分两个阶段对斯宾塞和西尔维娅·温特进行思考。在第一阶段,我读了斯宾塞在《仙后》中使用的“不人道”和“人道”这两个词,与布里安娜、克鲁多和“救难人”有关。我认为,斯宾塞对这些术语的使用,制定并说明了温特关于人作为人的过度代表的理论。在第二阶段,随着温特的解放推进,用大卫·斯科特的话说,“人文主义的重新魅力”,我重新考虑了这首诗的寓言计划的边缘可能意味着什么。如果“熊宝宝”和格里尔这样的人物可以被认为是人而不是人,那么它们不仅揭示了人的想象的局限性,而且要求人类的另一种诗歌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“What art thou man, (if man at all thou art)”: Spenser with Sylvia Wynter
This essay reaches toward thinking Spenser with Sylvia Wynter in two stages. In the first stage, I read Spenser’s use of the terms “inhumanitie” and “humanity” in The Faerie Queene in relation to Briana, Crudor, and the “salvage man.” Spenser’s use of these terms, I suggest, enacts and illustrates Wynter’s theory of the overrepresentation of Man as the human. In the second stage, thinking alongside Wynter’s emancipatory thrust toward, in David Scott’s terms, the “re-enchantment of humanism,” I reconsider what it might mean to be deposited on the edges of the poem’s allegorical scheme. If figures like the “bear-baby” and Gryll can be thought of as human but not on Man’s terms, they not only reveal the limits of Man’s imaginary but also demand an alternative poetry of the human.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spenser Studies
Spenser Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信