Srivastava N.C., Erdi Y.E., Humm J.L., Larson S.M.
{"title":"8. 正电子发射断层扫描(PET)成像中肿瘤识别的球坐标系","authors":"Srivastava N.C., Erdi Y.E., Humm J.L., Larson S.M.","doi":"10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00074-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> PET can be useful in determining the progression of malignant disease over time as well as the response to therapy. To achieve this, the physician must be able to unambiguously identify and characterize individual tumors among several different scans.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> We have developed a spherical coordinate system for identifying individual tumor sites on PET scans, using the carina on the transmission scan as a point of origin. Using this system, each tumor is given a set of spherical coordinates that identifies its position: a rho (ρ, displacement from carina), a theta (θ, angle between the A-P axis and the tumor), and a phi (φ, angle between the cranial-caudal axis and the tumor).</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> We tested this method on a patient with metastatic thyroid cancer, who underwent <sup>18</sup>FDG and <sup>124</sup>I-Iodide PET scans in the same week. The patient had a total of 90 tumors, 82 of them identified in the <sup>18</sup>FDG scan and 35 in the <sup>124</sup>I-Iodide scan, with 27 tumors identified in both. For ρ, θ, and φ among the 27 matching pairs of tumors, the mean differences were 6.80 + 5 mm, 6.22 + 4.54°, and 5.51 + 5.81°, respectively. After thorough analysis, we have determined that corresponding tumors with ρ < 15 mm, θ and φ < 15° difference usually indicate a match. The disparity in coordinate values between corresponding tumors can be explained by the distinctive uptake patterns of the radiopharmaceuticals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Within a mean difference of 6.8 mm and 6°, this spherical coordinate system facilitates the identification and characterization of individual tumors among multiple scans, thus aiding in both the assessment of diagnostic capabilities of different tracers, and the tracking of tumors following therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T","volume":"3 4","pages":"Page 162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00074-1","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"8. A Spherical Coordinate System for Tumor Identification in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging\",\"authors\":\"Srivastava N.C., Erdi Y.E., Humm J.L., Larson S.M.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00074-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> PET can be useful in determining the progression of malignant disease over time as well as the response to therapy. To achieve this, the physician must be able to unambiguously identify and characterize individual tumors among several different scans.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> We have developed a spherical coordinate system for identifying individual tumor sites on PET scans, using the carina on the transmission scan as a point of origin. Using this system, each tumor is given a set of spherical coordinates that identifies its position: a rho (ρ, displacement from carina), a theta (θ, angle between the A-P axis and the tumor), and a phi (φ, angle between the cranial-caudal axis and the tumor).</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> We tested this method on a patient with metastatic thyroid cancer, who underwent <sup>18</sup>FDG and <sup>124</sup>I-Iodide PET scans in the same week. The patient had a total of 90 tumors, 82 of them identified in the <sup>18</sup>FDG scan and 35 in the <sup>124</sup>I-Iodide scan, with 27 tumors identified in both. For ρ, θ, and φ among the 27 matching pairs of tumors, the mean differences were 6.80 + 5 mm, 6.22 + 4.54°, and 5.51 + 5.81°, respectively. After thorough analysis, we have determined that corresponding tumors with ρ < 15 mm, θ and φ < 15° difference usually indicate a match. The disparity in coordinate values between corresponding tumors can be explained by the distinctive uptake patterns of the radiopharmaceuticals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Within a mean difference of 6.8 mm and 6°, this spherical coordinate system facilitates the identification and characterization of individual tumors among multiple scans, thus aiding in both the assessment of diagnostic capabilities of different tracers, and the tracking of tumors following therapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Page 162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00074-1\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1095039700000741\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1095039700000741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
8. A Spherical Coordinate System for Tumor Identification in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging
Purpose: PET can be useful in determining the progression of malignant disease over time as well as the response to therapy. To achieve this, the physician must be able to unambiguously identify and characterize individual tumors among several different scans.
Methods: We have developed a spherical coordinate system for identifying individual tumor sites on PET scans, using the carina on the transmission scan as a point of origin. Using this system, each tumor is given a set of spherical coordinates that identifies its position: a rho (ρ, displacement from carina), a theta (θ, angle between the A-P axis and the tumor), and a phi (φ, angle between the cranial-caudal axis and the tumor).
Results: We tested this method on a patient with metastatic thyroid cancer, who underwent 18FDG and 124I-Iodide PET scans in the same week. The patient had a total of 90 tumors, 82 of them identified in the 18FDG scan and 35 in the 124I-Iodide scan, with 27 tumors identified in both. For ρ, θ, and φ among the 27 matching pairs of tumors, the mean differences were 6.80 + 5 mm, 6.22 + 4.54°, and 5.51 + 5.81°, respectively. After thorough analysis, we have determined that corresponding tumors with ρ < 15 mm, θ and φ < 15° difference usually indicate a match. The disparity in coordinate values between corresponding tumors can be explained by the distinctive uptake patterns of the radiopharmaceuticals.
Conclusion: Within a mean difference of 6.8 mm and 6°, this spherical coordinate system facilitates the identification and characterization of individual tumors among multiple scans, thus aiding in both the assessment of diagnostic capabilities of different tracers, and the tracking of tumors following therapy.