PHC管桩安装前后土体工程性质评价

Jun Ju, Zhi-bin Liu
{"title":"PHC管桩安装前后土体工程性质评价","authors":"Jun Ju, Zhi-bin Liu","doi":"10.1109/RSETE.2011.5964490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers at home and abroad are mainly focused on the bearing capacity, effects of soil plug and pile driving of PHC pipe piles. However, little attention is paid to property variation of soil before and after their installation especially when different installation technology is adopted. For further study of engineering property of PHC pipe pile composite foundation, the property variation of soils among PHC pile piles before and after their installation was studied with CPTU in-situ test technique in northern connection project of Chongqi Bridge expressway. The results indicate that, regardless of the pile installation, either hammer percussion method or static pressure method, several physical and mechanical parameters of soils among PHC piles were increased while both the consolidation coefficient and permeability coefficient of soft soil decreased one year after installation. For hammer percussion method, during the process of pile driving, soils around the pile accept a strong non-uniform drag effect, which makes the soil compacted in local area significantly. So the CPTU tip resistance of hammer percussion method is often significantly higher than that of static pressure method in local areas, which also leads to that the average deduced parameters of hammer percussion method such as the relative density and the effective internal friction angle of sand or undrained shear strength of cohesive soil are usually higher. Under the condition of same geology and design parameters, the skin friction of soils around pile in hammer percussion method is generally lower than that of static pressure method. This is of great significance for the PHC pipe pile which used as friction pile and for the bearing characteristic of PHC pipe pile composite foundation.","PeriodicalId":6296,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"1179-1182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engineering property evaluation of soil before and after PHC pipe pile installation\",\"authors\":\"Jun Ju, Zhi-bin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RSETE.2011.5964490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchers at home and abroad are mainly focused on the bearing capacity, effects of soil plug and pile driving of PHC pipe piles. However, little attention is paid to property variation of soil before and after their installation especially when different installation technology is adopted. For further study of engineering property of PHC pipe pile composite foundation, the property variation of soils among PHC pile piles before and after their installation was studied with CPTU in-situ test technique in northern connection project of Chongqi Bridge expressway. The results indicate that, regardless of the pile installation, either hammer percussion method or static pressure method, several physical and mechanical parameters of soils among PHC piles were increased while both the consolidation coefficient and permeability coefficient of soft soil decreased one year after installation. For hammer percussion method, during the process of pile driving, soils around the pile accept a strong non-uniform drag effect, which makes the soil compacted in local area significantly. So the CPTU tip resistance of hammer percussion method is often significantly higher than that of static pressure method in local areas, which also leads to that the average deduced parameters of hammer percussion method such as the relative density and the effective internal friction angle of sand or undrained shear strength of cohesive soil are usually higher. Under the condition of same geology and design parameters, the skin friction of soils around pile in hammer percussion method is generally lower than that of static pressure method. This is of great significance for the PHC pipe pile which used as friction pile and for the bearing characteristic of PHC pipe pile composite foundation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"1179-1182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RSETE.2011.5964490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RSETE.2011.5964490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国内外的研究主要集中在PHC管桩的承载力、土塞效应和打桩方面。但对于安装前后土体性质的变化,特别是采用不同的安装工艺时,关注较少。为进一步研究PHC管桩复合地基的工程特性,采用CPTU原位试验技术,研究了崇岐大桥高速公路北接工程PHC管桩安装前后桩间土体特性的变化。结果表明,无论是锤击法还是静压法,PHC桩间土体的若干物理力学参数均有所增加,而软土固结系数和渗透系数在安装1年后均有所下降。锤击法在打桩过程中,桩周土体受到较强的非均匀阻力作用,使得局部土体压实明显。因此,锤击法的CPTU尖端阻力往往在局部区域显著高于静压法,这也导致锤击法的平均推导参数如砂的相对密度和有效内摩擦角或粘性土的不排水抗剪强度通常更高。在相同地质条件和设计参数的情况下,锤击法的桩周土体表面摩阻力一般低于静压法。这对于作为摩擦桩的PHC管桩和PHC管桩复合地基的承载特性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engineering property evaluation of soil before and after PHC pipe pile installation
Researchers at home and abroad are mainly focused on the bearing capacity, effects of soil plug and pile driving of PHC pipe piles. However, little attention is paid to property variation of soil before and after their installation especially when different installation technology is adopted. For further study of engineering property of PHC pipe pile composite foundation, the property variation of soils among PHC pile piles before and after their installation was studied with CPTU in-situ test technique in northern connection project of Chongqi Bridge expressway. The results indicate that, regardless of the pile installation, either hammer percussion method or static pressure method, several physical and mechanical parameters of soils among PHC piles were increased while both the consolidation coefficient and permeability coefficient of soft soil decreased one year after installation. For hammer percussion method, during the process of pile driving, soils around the pile accept a strong non-uniform drag effect, which makes the soil compacted in local area significantly. So the CPTU tip resistance of hammer percussion method is often significantly higher than that of static pressure method in local areas, which also leads to that the average deduced parameters of hammer percussion method such as the relative density and the effective internal friction angle of sand or undrained shear strength of cohesive soil are usually higher. Under the condition of same geology and design parameters, the skin friction of soils around pile in hammer percussion method is generally lower than that of static pressure method. This is of great significance for the PHC pipe pile which used as friction pile and for the bearing characteristic of PHC pipe pile composite foundation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信