守门人的困境:“我应该什么时候转移这位客户?”

B. Hathaway, E. Kagan, M. Dada
{"title":"守门人的困境:“我应该什么时候转移这位客户?”","authors":"B. Hathaway, E. Kagan, M. Dada","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3617356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many service encounters front-line workers (often referred to as gatekeepers) have the discretion to attempt to resolve a customer request, or to transfer the customer to an expert service provider within the organization. We study the gatekeeper’s transfer decision using an integrated approach that consists of a field study, an analytical model and a behavioral experiment. Drawing on a proprietary dataset of 9.8 million interactions between the customers and call center agents of a US-based Bank, we formulate and solve a dynamic finite-horizon model that characterizes the gatekeeper’s response to different incentive schemes and to different queueing dynamics. We then conduct experiments to examine how human behavior deviates from the normative implications of the model. We find that: 1) Simple bonus-based incentives lead to transfer behaviors that are broadly consistent with the model predictions; 2) Adding transfer penalties to a bonus- based system uniformly reduces transfer rates, even controlling for incentive differences; 3) Gatekeepers are able to incorporate the state of the queue into their decisions. Taken together, these results help provide behavioral underpinnings for future models of discretionary server behavior in queueing systems.","PeriodicalId":89488,"journal":{"name":"The electronic journal of human sexuality","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Gatekeeper’s Dilemma: 'When Should I Transfer This Customer?'\",\"authors\":\"B. Hathaway, E. Kagan, M. Dada\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3617356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In many service encounters front-line workers (often referred to as gatekeepers) have the discretion to attempt to resolve a customer request, or to transfer the customer to an expert service provider within the organization. We study the gatekeeper’s transfer decision using an integrated approach that consists of a field study, an analytical model and a behavioral experiment. Drawing on a proprietary dataset of 9.8 million interactions between the customers and call center agents of a US-based Bank, we formulate and solve a dynamic finite-horizon model that characterizes the gatekeeper’s response to different incentive schemes and to different queueing dynamics. We then conduct experiments to examine how human behavior deviates from the normative implications of the model. We find that: 1) Simple bonus-based incentives lead to transfer behaviors that are broadly consistent with the model predictions; 2) Adding transfer penalties to a bonus- based system uniformly reduces transfer rates, even controlling for incentive differences; 3) Gatekeepers are able to incorporate the state of the queue into their decisions. Taken together, these results help provide behavioral underpinnings for future models of discretionary server behavior in queueing systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The electronic journal of human sexuality\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The electronic journal of human sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3617356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The electronic journal of human sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3617356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在许多服务遭遇中,一线工作人员(通常被称为看门人)拥有尝试解决客户请求或将客户转移到组织内的专家服务提供者的自由裁量权。本文采用实地调研、分析模型和行为实验相结合的方法研究了看门人的转移决策。利用一家美国银行客户与呼叫中心代理之间980万次交互的专有数据集,我们制定并解决了一个动态有限视界模型,该模型表征了看门人对不同激励方案和不同排队动态的反应。然后,我们进行实验来检查人类行为如何偏离模型的规范含义。研究发现:1)简单的奖金激励导致转移行为与模型预测基本一致;2)在以奖金为基础的制度中加入转移处罚,均匀地降低了转移率,甚至控制了激励差异;看门人能够将队列的状态纳入他们的决策中。综上所述,这些结果有助于为排队系统中任意服务器行为的未来模型提供行为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Gatekeeper’s Dilemma: 'When Should I Transfer This Customer?'
In many service encounters front-line workers (often referred to as gatekeepers) have the discretion to attempt to resolve a customer request, or to transfer the customer to an expert service provider within the organization. We study the gatekeeper’s transfer decision using an integrated approach that consists of a field study, an analytical model and a behavioral experiment. Drawing on a proprietary dataset of 9.8 million interactions between the customers and call center agents of a US-based Bank, we formulate and solve a dynamic finite-horizon model that characterizes the gatekeeper’s response to different incentive schemes and to different queueing dynamics. We then conduct experiments to examine how human behavior deviates from the normative implications of the model. We find that: 1) Simple bonus-based incentives lead to transfer behaviors that are broadly consistent with the model predictions; 2) Adding transfer penalties to a bonus- based system uniformly reduces transfer rates, even controlling for incentive differences; 3) Gatekeepers are able to incorporate the state of the queue into their decisions. Taken together, these results help provide behavioral underpinnings for future models of discretionary server behavior in queueing systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信