交易对手信用风险与美国期权

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Peter G. Klein, Jun Yang
{"title":"交易对手信用风险与美国期权","authors":"Peter G. Klein, Jun Yang","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1600911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the many counterintuitive things students in a first course on options learn is that premature exercise of an American call option on a nondividend paying stock is a mistake, and that for a dividend-paying stock, early exercise is never rational except just before the stock goes ex-dividend. Efforts to incorporate counterparty credit risk in the calculation have suggested assuming no change in exercise policy and simply discount the projected future cash flows at a higher risky interest rate. Others have argued that counterparty default should never happen with American options because the holder will exercise just before the counterparty defaults and effectively step in front of the other creditors to be paid in full. Klein and Yang show that these ideas are incorrect. Early exercise gives up the option’s time value, so that even when imminent counterparty default is perfectly predictable, there is still a cost to exercise for credit reasons. Moreover, properly taking counterparty risk into account leads to optimal exercise behavior different from that in the nonvulnerable case, so simply discounting the same cash flows at a different rate undervalues the vulnerable option. The difference is particularly important when counterparty risk is wrong-way risk, such that the counterparty’s credit weakens under the same conditions that the option is in the money.","PeriodicalId":40006,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Derivatives","volume":"18 1","pages":"7-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Counterparty Credit Risk and American Options\",\"authors\":\"Peter G. Klein, Jun Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1600911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the many counterintuitive things students in a first course on options learn is that premature exercise of an American call option on a nondividend paying stock is a mistake, and that for a dividend-paying stock, early exercise is never rational except just before the stock goes ex-dividend. Efforts to incorporate counterparty credit risk in the calculation have suggested assuming no change in exercise policy and simply discount the projected future cash flows at a higher risky interest rate. Others have argued that counterparty default should never happen with American options because the holder will exercise just before the counterparty defaults and effectively step in front of the other creditors to be paid in full. Klein and Yang show that these ideas are incorrect. Early exercise gives up the option’s time value, so that even when imminent counterparty default is perfectly predictable, there is still a cost to exercise for credit reasons. Moreover, properly taking counterparty risk into account leads to optimal exercise behavior different from that in the nonvulnerable case, so simply discounting the same cash flows at a different rate undervalues the vulnerable option. The difference is particularly important when counterparty risk is wrong-way risk, such that the counterparty’s credit weakens under the same conditions that the option is in the money.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Derivatives\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"7-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Derivatives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1600911\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Derivatives","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1600911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

在期权第一课上,学生们学到的许多违反直觉的事情之一是,对不支付股息的股票过早行使美式看涨期权是错误的,而对于支付股息的股票,除非在股票除息之前,提前行使期权永远都是不理性的。将交易对手信用风险纳入计算的努力建议,假设行权政策没有变化,只是以更高的风险利率对预计的未来现金流量进行贴现。其他人则认为,美国期权不应该发生交易对手违约,因为持有人将在交易对手违约之前行使期权,从而有效地走在其他债权人的前面,以便获得全额偿付。克莱因和杨表明,这些想法是不正确的。提前行使期权放弃了期权的时间价值,因此,即使交易对手即将违约是完全可以预测的,出于信用原因,行使期权仍有成本。此外,适当地考虑交易对手风险会导致最优行权行为不同于非易损性期权,因此简单地以不同的比率贴现相同的现金流会低估易损性期权。当交易对手的风险是错误的风险时,这种差异尤其重要,比如在期权持有的相同条件下,交易对手的信用减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Counterparty Credit Risk and American Options
One of the many counterintuitive things students in a first course on options learn is that premature exercise of an American call option on a nondividend paying stock is a mistake, and that for a dividend-paying stock, early exercise is never rational except just before the stock goes ex-dividend. Efforts to incorporate counterparty credit risk in the calculation have suggested assuming no change in exercise policy and simply discount the projected future cash flows at a higher risky interest rate. Others have argued that counterparty default should never happen with American options because the holder will exercise just before the counterparty defaults and effectively step in front of the other creditors to be paid in full. Klein and Yang show that these ideas are incorrect. Early exercise gives up the option’s time value, so that even when imminent counterparty default is perfectly predictable, there is still a cost to exercise for credit reasons. Moreover, properly taking counterparty risk into account leads to optimal exercise behavior different from that in the nonvulnerable case, so simply discounting the same cash flows at a different rate undervalues the vulnerable option. The difference is particularly important when counterparty risk is wrong-way risk, such that the counterparty’s credit weakens under the same conditions that the option is in the money.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Derivatives
Journal of Derivatives Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Derivatives (JOD) is the leading analytical journal on derivatives, providing detailed analyses of theoretical models and how they are used in practice. JOD gives you results-oriented analysis and provides full treatment of mathematical and statistical information on derivatives products and techniques. JOD includes articles about: •The latest valuation and hedging models for derivative instruments and securities •New tools and models for financial risk management •How to apply academic derivatives theory and research to real-world problems •Illustration and rigorous analysis of key innovations in derivative securities and derivative markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信