用于监管目的的分析方法的性能特征。第二部分。农药剂型。

W. Horwitz, R. Albert
{"title":"用于监管目的的分析方法的性能特征。第二部分。农药剂型。","authors":"W. Horwitz, R. Albert","doi":"10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The precision parameters of the method-performance (collaborative) studies published in the AOAC Journal from 1915 through 1990 for pesticide formulations have been recalculated on a uniform basis by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry 1987 protocol. About 93% of the 953 accepted assays, which are predominantly gravimetric (G), volumetric (V), and gas (GC) and liquid (LC) chromatographic methods, exhibit relative standard deviations among laboratories (RSDR) that are generally less than 2 times the values predicted from the Horwitz equation: RSDR (%) = 2 exp (1-0.5 log C), where C is the concentration expressed as a decimal fraction. UV, VIS, and IR spectrophotometric (S) methods are somewhat poorer, with about 80% of the reported RSDR values less than twice the predicted RSDR value. The precision parameters of pesticide formulations analyzed by the older methods (G, V, GC) are equivalent to those previously found for drug preparations in the same concentration range; the precision parameters of pesticide formulations analyzed by LC and S are somewhat poorer. Overall, however, the precision parameters of pesticide formulations are generally independent of analyte, method, and matrix, and are primarily a function of concentration. The method-acceptability decisions of the AOAC for pesticide formulations during the past 75 years can be approximated retrospectively by using a criterion for RSDR that is less than 2 times the RSDR calculated from the Horwitz equation.","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"6 1","pages":"718-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance characteristics of methods of analysis used for regulatory purposes. Part II. Pesticide formulations.\",\"authors\":\"W. Horwitz, R. Albert\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The precision parameters of the method-performance (collaborative) studies published in the AOAC Journal from 1915 through 1990 for pesticide formulations have been recalculated on a uniform basis by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry 1987 protocol. About 93% of the 953 accepted assays, which are predominantly gravimetric (G), volumetric (V), and gas (GC) and liquid (LC) chromatographic methods, exhibit relative standard deviations among laboratories (RSDR) that are generally less than 2 times the values predicted from the Horwitz equation: RSDR (%) = 2 exp (1-0.5 log C), where C is the concentration expressed as a decimal fraction. UV, VIS, and IR spectrophotometric (S) methods are somewhat poorer, with about 80% of the reported RSDR values less than twice the predicted RSDR value. The precision parameters of pesticide formulations analyzed by the older methods (G, V, GC) are equivalent to those previously found for drug preparations in the same concentration range; the precision parameters of pesticide formulations analyzed by LC and S are somewhat poorer. Overall, however, the precision parameters of pesticide formulations are generally independent of analyte, method, and matrix, and are primarily a function of concentration. The method-acceptability decisions of the AOAC for pesticide formulations during the past 75 years can be approximated retrospectively by using a criterion for RSDR that is less than 2 times the RSDR calculated from the Horwitz equation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"718-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

从1915年到1990年发表在AOAC杂志上的关于农药配方的方法性能(合作)研究的精度参数已根据国际纯粹与应用化学联合会1987年的协议在统一的基础上重新计算。在953种被接受的检测方法中,约93%的检测方法主要是重量(G)、体积(V)、气相(GC)和液相(LC)色谱法,其实验室间的相对标准偏差(RSDR)通常小于Horwitz方程预测值的2倍:RSDR (%) = 2 exp (1-0.5 log C),其中C是用十进制分数表示的浓度。UV, VIS和IR分光光度法(S)方法稍差,约80%的报告RSDR值小于预测RSDR值的两倍。用旧方法(G、V、GC)分析农药制剂的精密度参数与以前在相同浓度范围内的药物制剂的精密度参数相当;LC和S分析的农药配方精度参数稍差。然而,总体而言,农药配方的精密度参数通常与分析物、方法和基质无关,而主要是浓度的函数。在过去的75年里,AOAC对农药配方的方法可接受性决定可以通过使用RSDR标准进行追溯近似,该标准小于由Horwitz方程计算的RSDR的2倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance characteristics of methods of analysis used for regulatory purposes. Part II. Pesticide formulations.
The precision parameters of the method-performance (collaborative) studies published in the AOAC Journal from 1915 through 1990 for pesticide formulations have been recalculated on a uniform basis by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry 1987 protocol. About 93% of the 953 accepted assays, which are predominantly gravimetric (G), volumetric (V), and gas (GC) and liquid (LC) chromatographic methods, exhibit relative standard deviations among laboratories (RSDR) that are generally less than 2 times the values predicted from the Horwitz equation: RSDR (%) = 2 exp (1-0.5 log C), where C is the concentration expressed as a decimal fraction. UV, VIS, and IR spectrophotometric (S) methods are somewhat poorer, with about 80% of the reported RSDR values less than twice the predicted RSDR value. The precision parameters of pesticide formulations analyzed by the older methods (G, V, GC) are equivalent to those previously found for drug preparations in the same concentration range; the precision parameters of pesticide formulations analyzed by LC and S are somewhat poorer. Overall, however, the precision parameters of pesticide formulations are generally independent of analyte, method, and matrix, and are primarily a function of concentration. The method-acceptability decisions of the AOAC for pesticide formulations during the past 75 years can be approximated retrospectively by using a criterion for RSDR that is less than 2 times the RSDR calculated from the Horwitz equation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信