外固定架作为最终治疗方法治疗III级开放性胫骨骨折的功能结局评价

Bintang Soetjahjo, R. Ermawan, R. Saputra, Udi Herunefi Hancoro, Bagus Nugroho, Jiva Yori Anugra
{"title":"外固定架作为最终治疗方法治疗III级开放性胫骨骨折的功能结局评价","authors":"Bintang Soetjahjo, R. Ermawan, R. Saputra, Udi Herunefi Hancoro, Bagus Nugroho, Jiva Yori Anugra","doi":"10.26911/theijmed.2021.06.04.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tibial shaft fractures including open tibial fractures grade III are one of the most common fractures of long bones. There are many methods of conservative and operative treatment, one of them is external fixation. External fixation is more common used temporary in polytraumatized patients with tibial shaft fractures. The study was undertaken to see if the patient can be treated with external fixation as the definitive treatment and evaluate the functional outcome after the treatment. Subjects and Method: A retrospective review of a prospectively-collected database was performed. Data was taken from the Orthopaedic Department of RSUD Dr. Moewardi Hospital patients’ database. The study included all patients who underwent grade III open tibial fracture treatment from May 2018 to May 2019. A total of 8 patients who were included in our study were a patient with open tibial fractures grade III planned for external fixaton as definitive treatment. They were evaluated radiographically and clinically to determine the union rate. The data were reported descriptively. Results: External fixator time ranged in this study around 240 days. In this study, there were a few patients whose progress were remain unknown due to loss of contact. Fractures studied 5 out of 8, no patient were union after 8 months of external fixator used. 4 out of 8 patients were reported non-union after 8 months based on their radiological examination (50%) and 1 out of 8 patients were reported has been performed Removal of External Fixation (ROEF) after 5 months of treatment. The rest of the 3 patients’ results were remain unknown. Conclusion: Open tibial fractures grade III of the leg can be managed with use of external fixator as a definitive treatment. However, the use of external fixation does not provide maximum results in grade III A tibial fractures.","PeriodicalId":13354,"journal":{"name":"IJAAM (Indonesian Journal of Anti-Aging Medicine)","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Outcome Evaluation of Grade III Open Tibial Fracture Treated by External Fixation as Definitive Treatment\",\"authors\":\"Bintang Soetjahjo, R. Ermawan, R. Saputra, Udi Herunefi Hancoro, Bagus Nugroho, Jiva Yori Anugra\",\"doi\":\"10.26911/theijmed.2021.06.04.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Tibial shaft fractures including open tibial fractures grade III are one of the most common fractures of long bones. There are many methods of conservative and operative treatment, one of them is external fixation. External fixation is more common used temporary in polytraumatized patients with tibial shaft fractures. The study was undertaken to see if the patient can be treated with external fixation as the definitive treatment and evaluate the functional outcome after the treatment. Subjects and Method: A retrospective review of a prospectively-collected database was performed. Data was taken from the Orthopaedic Department of RSUD Dr. Moewardi Hospital patients’ database. The study included all patients who underwent grade III open tibial fracture treatment from May 2018 to May 2019. A total of 8 patients who were included in our study were a patient with open tibial fractures grade III planned for external fixaton as definitive treatment. They were evaluated radiographically and clinically to determine the union rate. The data were reported descriptively. Results: External fixator time ranged in this study around 240 days. In this study, there were a few patients whose progress were remain unknown due to loss of contact. Fractures studied 5 out of 8, no patient were union after 8 months of external fixator used. 4 out of 8 patients were reported non-union after 8 months based on their radiological examination (50%) and 1 out of 8 patients were reported has been performed Removal of External Fixation (ROEF) after 5 months of treatment. The rest of the 3 patients’ results were remain unknown. Conclusion: Open tibial fractures grade III of the leg can be managed with use of external fixator as a definitive treatment. However, the use of external fixation does not provide maximum results in grade III A tibial fractures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJAAM (Indonesian Journal of Anti-Aging Medicine)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJAAM (Indonesian Journal of Anti-Aging Medicine)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26911/theijmed.2021.06.04.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJAAM (Indonesian Journal of Anti-Aging Medicine)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26911/theijmed.2021.06.04.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胫骨干骨折包括开放性胫骨骨折III级是长骨最常见的骨折之一。保守和手术治疗的方法有很多,其中之一就是外固定。外固定支架在胫骨干骨折多发创伤患者中更为常见。该研究旨在了解患者是否可以将外固定作为最终治疗方法,并评估治疗后的功能结果。对象和方法:对前瞻性收集的数据库进行回顾性审查。数据来自RSUD Dr. Moewardi医院骨科患者数据库。该研究包括2018年5月至2019年5月期间接受III级胫骨开放性骨折治疗的所有患者。在我们的研究中,共有8例患者为III级胫骨开放性骨折患者,计划采用外固定作为最终治疗。通过影像学和临床评估来确定愈合率。数据以描述性方式报告。结果:本研究中外固定架使用时间约为240天。在本研究中,有少数患者因失联而无法得知病情进展。8例患者中有5例骨折,使用外固定架8个月后无骨折愈合。根据放射学检查,8个月后,8名患者中有4名出现骨不连(50%),8名患者中有1名在治疗5个月后进行了外固定物移除(ROEF)。其余3例患者的结果尚不清楚。结论:外固定架是治疗III级胫骨开放性骨折的有效方法。然而,对于III级A级胫骨骨折,使用外固定架并不能提供最大的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional Outcome Evaluation of Grade III Open Tibial Fracture Treated by External Fixation as Definitive Treatment
Background: Tibial shaft fractures including open tibial fractures grade III are one of the most common fractures of long bones. There are many methods of conservative and operative treatment, one of them is external fixation. External fixation is more common used temporary in polytraumatized patients with tibial shaft fractures. The study was undertaken to see if the patient can be treated with external fixation as the definitive treatment and evaluate the functional outcome after the treatment. Subjects and Method: A retrospective review of a prospectively-collected database was performed. Data was taken from the Orthopaedic Department of RSUD Dr. Moewardi Hospital patients’ database. The study included all patients who underwent grade III open tibial fracture treatment from May 2018 to May 2019. A total of 8 patients who were included in our study were a patient with open tibial fractures grade III planned for external fixaton as definitive treatment. They were evaluated radiographically and clinically to determine the union rate. The data were reported descriptively. Results: External fixator time ranged in this study around 240 days. In this study, there were a few patients whose progress were remain unknown due to loss of contact. Fractures studied 5 out of 8, no patient were union after 8 months of external fixator used. 4 out of 8 patients were reported non-union after 8 months based on their radiological examination (50%) and 1 out of 8 patients were reported has been performed Removal of External Fixation (ROEF) after 5 months of treatment. The rest of the 3 patients’ results were remain unknown. Conclusion: Open tibial fractures grade III of the leg can be managed with use of external fixator as a definitive treatment. However, the use of external fixation does not provide maximum results in grade III A tibial fractures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信