不必要的建议

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Linda Loberg, Stephan Nüesch, Alexandra M. Allendorf
{"title":"不必要的建议","authors":"Linda Loberg, Stephan Nüesch, Alexandra M. Allendorf","doi":"10.1026/0932-4089/a000417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In performance appraisal processes, corporations face the problem that the subjective ratings of employee performance tend to be largely biased toward being too favorable and too homogeneous. Drawing on prospect theory, we conceptualize below-average employee ratings as perceived losses and suggest that the proportion of such ratings increases under a recommended rating distribution because of a higher rating dispersion. The perceived losses may decrease employees’ organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and cooperation while increasing their turnover intentions. Using a large-scale, dual-source proprietary panel dataset from the German Federal Employment Agency, we show that a recommended distribution rating system is negatively related to organizational commitment, while job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and cooperation are unaffected when considering the whole sample. Post-hoc analyses reveal that the adverse effects appear in employees without managerial responsibility, while employees with managerial responsibility remain unaffected by the recommended distribution rating system.","PeriodicalId":44883,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits-Und Organisationspsychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unwanted Recommendation\",\"authors\":\"Linda Loberg, Stephan Nüesch, Alexandra M. Allendorf\",\"doi\":\"10.1026/0932-4089/a000417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: In performance appraisal processes, corporations face the problem that the subjective ratings of employee performance tend to be largely biased toward being too favorable and too homogeneous. Drawing on prospect theory, we conceptualize below-average employee ratings as perceived losses and suggest that the proportion of such ratings increases under a recommended rating distribution because of a higher rating dispersion. The perceived losses may decrease employees’ organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and cooperation while increasing their turnover intentions. Using a large-scale, dual-source proprietary panel dataset from the German Federal Employment Agency, we show that a recommended distribution rating system is negatively related to organizational commitment, while job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and cooperation are unaffected when considering the whole sample. Post-hoc analyses reveal that the adverse effects appear in employees without managerial responsibility, while employees with managerial responsibility remain unaffected by the recommended distribution rating system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits-Und Organisationspsychologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits-Und Organisationspsychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000417\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits-Und Organisationspsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在绩效考核过程中,企业面临着对员工绩效的主观评价往往过于有利、过于同质化的问题。根据前景理论,我们将低于平均水平的员工评级概念化为感知损失,并建议在推荐的评级分布下,由于更高的评级分散,此类评级的比例会增加。感知损失会降低员工的组织承诺、工作满意度和合作度,同时增加员工的离职意愿。使用来自德国联邦就业局的大型、双源专有面板数据集,我们发现推荐分配评级系统与组织承诺负相关,而工作满意度、离职意向和合作在考虑整个样本时不受影响。事后分析表明,不利影响出现在没有管理责任的员工身上,而有管理责任的员工不受推荐分配评级制度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unwanted Recommendation
Abstract: In performance appraisal processes, corporations face the problem that the subjective ratings of employee performance tend to be largely biased toward being too favorable and too homogeneous. Drawing on prospect theory, we conceptualize below-average employee ratings as perceived losses and suggest that the proportion of such ratings increases under a recommended rating distribution because of a higher rating dispersion. The perceived losses may decrease employees’ organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and cooperation while increasing their turnover intentions. Using a large-scale, dual-source proprietary panel dataset from the German Federal Employment Agency, we show that a recommended distribution rating system is negatively related to organizational commitment, while job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and cooperation are unaffected when considering the whole sample. Post-hoc analyses reveal that the adverse effects appear in employees without managerial responsibility, while employees with managerial responsibility remain unaffected by the recommended distribution rating system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: In Kooperation mit der Sektion Arbeits-, Betriebs- und Organisationspsychologie im Berufsverband Deutscher Psychologen (BDP)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信