回顾经皮经食管胃造口术:一个多医院学术机构的24例病例系列

J. Frenkel, Steven Krausz, J. Cynamon, Y. Golowa, D. Hirschl
{"title":"回顾经皮经食管胃造口术:一个多医院学术机构的24例病例系列","authors":"J. Frenkel, Steven Krausz, J. Cynamon, Y. Golowa, D. Hirschl","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy (PTEG) is a minimally invasive technique involving percutaneous placement of an enteral tube via an esophagostomy in patients for whom conventional gastrostomy is contraindicated. We present a series of 24 patients who received PTEG, discuss indications for the procedure, and review outcomes. A retrospective chart review of the EMR was performed for patients who received PTEG from March 2016 through October 2021. Twenty-four patients were identified, and their records were reviewed for placement indication, technical success, adverse events, feeding complications, and replacement. Twenty-four patients (aged 29–91) required gastric tube placement for either enteral feeding or palliative venting. Conventional gastrostomy was contraindicated for reasons including difficult anatomy (eight), gastric surgery (five), malignancy (four), ascites (four), and wounds/infections (three). Technical success rate for placement was 100%. Minor postprocedural complications included local cellulitis, significant tube clogging, and dislodgement. There was one major complication, a significant bleed through the catheter entry site, which was successfully treated with a carotid covered stent. PTEG is safe and effective and should be strongly considered for gastric drainage or provisional supplemental nutrition in patients for whom percutaneous gastrostomy is contraindicated or technically not feasible.","PeriodicalId":91014,"journal":{"name":"Digestive disease interventions","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Percutaneous Transesophageal Gastrostomy: A Multi-Hospital Academic Institution's Case Series of 24 Patients\",\"authors\":\"J. Frenkel, Steven Krausz, J. Cynamon, Y. Golowa, D. Hirschl\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1771481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy (PTEG) is a minimally invasive technique involving percutaneous placement of an enteral tube via an esophagostomy in patients for whom conventional gastrostomy is contraindicated. We present a series of 24 patients who received PTEG, discuss indications for the procedure, and review outcomes. A retrospective chart review of the EMR was performed for patients who received PTEG from March 2016 through October 2021. Twenty-four patients were identified, and their records were reviewed for placement indication, technical success, adverse events, feeding complications, and replacement. Twenty-four patients (aged 29–91) required gastric tube placement for either enteral feeding or palliative venting. Conventional gastrostomy was contraindicated for reasons including difficult anatomy (eight), gastric surgery (five), malignancy (four), ascites (four), and wounds/infections (three). Technical success rate for placement was 100%. Minor postprocedural complications included local cellulitis, significant tube clogging, and dislodgement. There was one major complication, a significant bleed through the catheter entry site, which was successfully treated with a carotid covered stent. PTEG is safe and effective and should be strongly considered for gastric drainage or provisional supplemental nutrition in patients for whom percutaneous gastrostomy is contraindicated or technically not feasible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive disease interventions\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive disease interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive disease interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经皮经食管胃造口术(PTEG)是一种微创技术,在常规胃造口术禁忌的患者中经皮经食管造口置入肠内管。我们介绍了24例接受PTEG的患者,讨论了该手术的适应症,并回顾了结果。对2016年3月至2021年10月期间接受PTEG治疗的患者进行了EMR回顾性图表回顾。确定了24例患者,并回顾了他们的记录,包括安置指征、技术成功、不良事件、喂养并发症和更换。24例患者(29-91岁)需要放置胃管进行肠内喂养或姑息性通气。常规胃造口术的禁忌原因包括解剖困难(8例)、胃手术(5例)、恶性肿瘤(4例)、腹水(4例)和伤口/感染(3例)。技术成功率为100%。轻微的术后并发症包括局部蜂窝织炎,严重的管道堵塞和移位。有一个主要的并发症,一个明显的出血通过导管进入的地方,这是成功地治疗了颈动脉覆盖支架。PTEG是安全有效的,对于经皮胃造口术禁忌或技术上不可行的患者,应强烈考虑用于胃引流或临时补充营养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of Percutaneous Transesophageal Gastrostomy: A Multi-Hospital Academic Institution's Case Series of 24 Patients
Abstract Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy (PTEG) is a minimally invasive technique involving percutaneous placement of an enteral tube via an esophagostomy in patients for whom conventional gastrostomy is contraindicated. We present a series of 24 patients who received PTEG, discuss indications for the procedure, and review outcomes. A retrospective chart review of the EMR was performed for patients who received PTEG from March 2016 through October 2021. Twenty-four patients were identified, and their records were reviewed for placement indication, technical success, adverse events, feeding complications, and replacement. Twenty-four patients (aged 29–91) required gastric tube placement for either enteral feeding or palliative venting. Conventional gastrostomy was contraindicated for reasons including difficult anatomy (eight), gastric surgery (five), malignancy (four), ascites (four), and wounds/infections (three). Technical success rate for placement was 100%. Minor postprocedural complications included local cellulitis, significant tube clogging, and dislodgement. There was one major complication, a significant bleed through the catheter entry site, which was successfully treated with a carotid covered stent. PTEG is safe and effective and should be strongly considered for gastric drainage or provisional supplemental nutrition in patients for whom percutaneous gastrostomy is contraindicated or technically not feasible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信