生物挑战试验诱发惊恐发作的认知中介作用

David M Clark
{"title":"生物挑战试验诱发惊恐发作的认知中介作用","authors":"David M Clark","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90004-L","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A variety of pharmacological and physiological procedures reliably induce panic attacks in panic disorder patients but rarely do so in controls. Some biologically orientated researchers have described these procedures as biological challenge tests and have assumed that pharmacological and physiological manipulations have a direct panic-inducing effect and that individuals who are susceptible to these manipulations have a neurochemical disorder. An alternative explanation is provided by the cognitive theory of panic which proposes that the challenge tests induce panic because they produce bodily sensations that panic patients are prone to misinterpret and that it is the misinterpretation which is responsible for the induced attack. Experiments that have attempted to test the cognitive mediation account of biological challenge induced panic are reviewed. Overall, the results of these experiments provide strong support for the cognitive mediation hypothesis. In addition, it is suggested that the crucial cognitive variable is likely to be interpretation of challenge induced sensations, not expected affect or perceived control of the sensations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 75-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90004-L","citationCount":"58","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive mediation of panic attacks induced by biological challenge tests\",\"authors\":\"David M Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90004-L\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A variety of pharmacological and physiological procedures reliably induce panic attacks in panic disorder patients but rarely do so in controls. Some biologically orientated researchers have described these procedures as biological challenge tests and have assumed that pharmacological and physiological manipulations have a direct panic-inducing effect and that individuals who are susceptible to these manipulations have a neurochemical disorder. An alternative explanation is provided by the cognitive theory of panic which proposes that the challenge tests induce panic because they produce bodily sensations that panic patients are prone to misinterpret and that it is the misinterpretation which is responsible for the induced attack. Experiments that have attempted to test the cognitive mediation account of biological challenge induced panic are reviewed. Overall, the results of these experiments provide strong support for the cognitive mediation hypothesis. In addition, it is suggested that the crucial cognitive variable is likely to be interpretation of challenge induced sensations, not expected affect or perceived control of the sensations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 75-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90004-L\",\"citationCount\":\"58\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664029390004L\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664029390004L","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

摘要

在惊恐障碍患者中,各种药理学和生理过程都可靠地诱发惊恐发作,但在对照组中却很少如此。一些以生物学为导向的研究人员将这些程序描述为生物挑战测试,并假设药理学和生理学操作具有直接的恐慌诱导作用,并且易受这些操作影响的个体患有神经化学障碍。恐慌的认知理论提供了另一种解释,该理论认为挑战测试会引起恐慌,因为它们会产生恐慌患者容易误解的身体感觉,而正是这种误解导致了诱发的攻击。实验已经试图测试的认知调解帐户的生物挑战诱发恐慌进行了回顾。总的来说,这些实验结果为认知中介假说提供了强有力的支持。此外,我们认为关键的认知变量可能是对挑战诱导的感觉的解释,而不是对感觉的预期影响或感知控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive mediation of panic attacks induced by biological challenge tests

A variety of pharmacological and physiological procedures reliably induce panic attacks in panic disorder patients but rarely do so in controls. Some biologically orientated researchers have described these procedures as biological challenge tests and have assumed that pharmacological and physiological manipulations have a direct panic-inducing effect and that individuals who are susceptible to these manipulations have a neurochemical disorder. An alternative explanation is provided by the cognitive theory of panic which proposes that the challenge tests induce panic because they produce bodily sensations that panic patients are prone to misinterpret and that it is the misinterpretation which is responsible for the induced attack. Experiments that have attempted to test the cognitive mediation account of biological challenge induced panic are reviewed. Overall, the results of these experiments provide strong support for the cognitive mediation hypothesis. In addition, it is suggested that the crucial cognitive variable is likely to be interpretation of challenge induced sensations, not expected affect or perceived control of the sensations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信