考虑到消费者的损失厌恶,新产品的预购

Xuying Zhao, K. Stecke
{"title":"考虑到消费者的损失厌恶,新产品的预购","authors":"Xuying Zhao, K. Stecke","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1375207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advance selling through pre-orders is a strategy to transfer inventory risk from a retailer to consumers. A newsvendor retailer can have three strategies to choose from: no advance selling allowed (NAS), moderate advance selling with a moderate discount for pre-orders (MAS), and deep advance selling with a deep discount for pre-orders (DAS). MAS allows for intermediate allocations of inventory risk: The retailer bears the risk on inventory carried for the selling season because of demand uncertainty while consumers bear the risk on products purchased in advance because of consumer valuation uncertainty. DAS completely transfers inventory risk from a retailer to consumers. This research studies how a retailer could design an advance selling strategy to maximize her own profits.We find some interesting results. For example, there exist two thresholds for the selling season profit margin and also two thresholds for consumer's expected valuation. For products with higher profit margin than the high threshold on profit margin, a retailer should always use a DAS strategy. For products with medium profit margin within the two thresholds, a retailer should adopt a MAS strategy if consumer's expected valuation is lower than the high threshold on expected valuation and use a DAS strategy otherwise. For products with lower profit margin than the low threshold on profit margin, a retailer should not encourage pre-order at all if consumer's expected valuation is lower than the low threshold on expected valuation, use a DAS strategy if consumer's expected valuation is higher than the high threshold, and use a MAS strategy if consumer's expected valuation is between the two thresholds. Through analytically comparing deep discount and moderate discount strategies, we also find that a strong correlation between the number of rational and loss averse consumers favors MAS more than DAS. An increase in consumer loss averse degree makes DAS less attractive to a retailer than MAS. An increase in the number of rational consumers hurts DAS more than MAS. An increase in the standard deviation of the number of loss averse consumers benefits DAS but hurts MAS.","PeriodicalId":82888,"journal":{"name":"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"104","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-Orders for New To-Be-Released Products Considering Consumer Loss Aversion\",\"authors\":\"Xuying Zhao, K. Stecke\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1375207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advance selling through pre-orders is a strategy to transfer inventory risk from a retailer to consumers. A newsvendor retailer can have three strategies to choose from: no advance selling allowed (NAS), moderate advance selling with a moderate discount for pre-orders (MAS), and deep advance selling with a deep discount for pre-orders (DAS). MAS allows for intermediate allocations of inventory risk: The retailer bears the risk on inventory carried for the selling season because of demand uncertainty while consumers bear the risk on products purchased in advance because of consumer valuation uncertainty. DAS completely transfers inventory risk from a retailer to consumers. This research studies how a retailer could design an advance selling strategy to maximize her own profits.We find some interesting results. For example, there exist two thresholds for the selling season profit margin and also two thresholds for consumer's expected valuation. For products with higher profit margin than the high threshold on profit margin, a retailer should always use a DAS strategy. For products with medium profit margin within the two thresholds, a retailer should adopt a MAS strategy if consumer's expected valuation is lower than the high threshold on expected valuation and use a DAS strategy otherwise. For products with lower profit margin than the low threshold on profit margin, a retailer should not encourage pre-order at all if consumer's expected valuation is lower than the low threshold on expected valuation, use a DAS strategy if consumer's expected valuation is higher than the high threshold, and use a MAS strategy if consumer's expected valuation is between the two thresholds. Through analytically comparing deep discount and moderate discount strategies, we also find that a strong correlation between the number of rational and loss averse consumers favors MAS more than DAS. An increase in consumer loss averse degree makes DAS less attractive to a retailer than MAS. An increase in the number of rational consumers hurts DAS more than MAS. An increase in the standard deviation of the number of loss averse consumers benefits DAS but hurts MAS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"104\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1375207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1375207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 104

摘要

通过预购提前销售是一种将库存风险从零售商转移给消费者的策略。报摊零售商有三种策略可供选择:不允许提前销售(NAS)、适度提前销售并对预订给予适度折扣(MAS)和深度提前销售并对预订给予深度折扣(DAS)。MAS允许库存风险的中间分配:零售商承担销售季节库存的风险,因为需求的不确定性;消费者承担预先购买产品的风险,因为消费者的估值的不确定性。DAS完全将库存风险从零售商转移到消费者。本研究研究零售商如何设计预先销售策略,以使自己的利润最大化。我们发现了一些有趣的结果。例如,销售季节利润率存在两个阈值,消费者预期估值也存在两个阈值。对于利润率高于利润率高门槛的产品,零售商应始终使用DAS策略。对于在两个阈值内利润率中等的产品,如果消费者的预期估值低于预期估值的高阈值,零售商应采用MAS策略,否则采用DAS策略。对于利润率低于利润率低门槛的产品,如果消费者的预期估值低于预期估值的低门槛,零售商不应鼓励预订,如果消费者的预期估值高于高门槛,则使用DAS策略,如果消费者的预期估值介于两个门槛之间,则使用MAS策略。通过对深度折扣策略和适度折扣策略的分析比较,我们也发现理性消费者和损失厌恶消费者的数量之间存在很强的相关性,他们更倾向于MAS而不是DAS。消费者损失厌恶程度的增加使得DAS对零售商的吸引力不如MAS。理性消费者数量的增加对DAS的伤害大于对MAS的伤害。厌恶损失的消费者数量的标准差的增加对DAS有利,但对MAS不利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-Orders for New To-Be-Released Products Considering Consumer Loss Aversion
Advance selling through pre-orders is a strategy to transfer inventory risk from a retailer to consumers. A newsvendor retailer can have three strategies to choose from: no advance selling allowed (NAS), moderate advance selling with a moderate discount for pre-orders (MAS), and deep advance selling with a deep discount for pre-orders (DAS). MAS allows for intermediate allocations of inventory risk: The retailer bears the risk on inventory carried for the selling season because of demand uncertainty while consumers bear the risk on products purchased in advance because of consumer valuation uncertainty. DAS completely transfers inventory risk from a retailer to consumers. This research studies how a retailer could design an advance selling strategy to maximize her own profits.We find some interesting results. For example, there exist two thresholds for the selling season profit margin and also two thresholds for consumer's expected valuation. For products with higher profit margin than the high threshold on profit margin, a retailer should always use a DAS strategy. For products with medium profit margin within the two thresholds, a retailer should adopt a MAS strategy if consumer's expected valuation is lower than the high threshold on expected valuation and use a DAS strategy otherwise. For products with lower profit margin than the low threshold on profit margin, a retailer should not encourage pre-order at all if consumer's expected valuation is lower than the low threshold on expected valuation, use a DAS strategy if consumer's expected valuation is higher than the high threshold, and use a MAS strategy if consumer's expected valuation is between the two thresholds. Through analytically comparing deep discount and moderate discount strategies, we also find that a strong correlation between the number of rational and loss averse consumers favors MAS more than DAS. An increase in consumer loss averse degree makes DAS less attractive to a retailer than MAS. An increase in the number of rational consumers hurts DAS more than MAS. An increase in the standard deviation of the number of loss averse consumers benefits DAS but hurts MAS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信