帕唑帕尼与舒尼替尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌的安全性比较

Eka Yudha Rahman, Choirin Nur, Deddy Rasyidan Yulizar
{"title":"帕唑帕尼与舒尼替尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌的安全性比较","authors":"Eka Yudha Rahman, Choirin Nur, Deddy Rasyidan Yulizar","doi":"10.21776/ub.jkb.2022.032.02.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney lesion with approximately 90% of all kidney malignancies and 30% of people with RCC have developed metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Based on European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline, therapy for metastatic RCC (mRCC) patient who cannot tolerate immune checkpoint inhibitor is pazopanib or sunitinib. However, these drugs cause several uncomfortable side effects for the patient. Therefore, this meta-analysis was made, based on the available evidence base, to compare the safety of pazopanib and sunitinib as the treatment of mRCC. Systematic reviews were made in accordance with the PRISMA guideline requirements, a literature review was conducted in January 2022 used PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, publishing year of at least 10 years with an adult population. And the data is analyzed using RevMan V.5.4. In total 1.665 participants, there were 431 patients taking pazopanib and 1.234 patients taking sunitinib from 8 studies. The result shows that sunitinib has more frequent result of side effects than pazopanib in several occasion like hand-foot syndrome, nausea/vomiting, skin rash, stomatitis & mucosal inflammation, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. Meanwhile, there are no significant differences between pazopanib and sunitinib in causing other side effect such as fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, anemia, and increased liver enzymes. The conclusion is that pazopanib is better and has less frequent side effects than sunitinib.","PeriodicalId":17705,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Assessment of the Safety between Pazopanib and Sunitinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Eka Yudha Rahman, Choirin Nur, Deddy Rasyidan Yulizar\",\"doi\":\"10.21776/ub.jkb.2022.032.02.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney lesion with approximately 90% of all kidney malignancies and 30% of people with RCC have developed metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Based on European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline, therapy for metastatic RCC (mRCC) patient who cannot tolerate immune checkpoint inhibitor is pazopanib or sunitinib. However, these drugs cause several uncomfortable side effects for the patient. Therefore, this meta-analysis was made, based on the available evidence base, to compare the safety of pazopanib and sunitinib as the treatment of mRCC. Systematic reviews were made in accordance with the PRISMA guideline requirements, a literature review was conducted in January 2022 used PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, publishing year of at least 10 years with an adult population. And the data is analyzed using RevMan V.5.4. In total 1.665 participants, there were 431 patients taking pazopanib and 1.234 patients taking sunitinib from 8 studies. The result shows that sunitinib has more frequent result of side effects than pazopanib in several occasion like hand-foot syndrome, nausea/vomiting, skin rash, stomatitis & mucosal inflammation, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. Meanwhile, there are no significant differences between pazopanib and sunitinib in causing other side effect such as fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, anemia, and increased liver enzymes. The conclusion is that pazopanib is better and has less frequent side effects than sunitinib.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jkb.2022.032.02.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jkb.2022.032.02.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肾细胞癌(RCC)是最常见的肾脏病变,约占所有肾恶性肿瘤的90%,30%的肾细胞癌患者在诊断时已发生转移。根据欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)指南,不能耐受免疫检查点抑制剂的转移性肾癌(mRCC)患者的治疗是帕唑帕尼或舒尼替尼。然而,这些药物会给病人带来一些不舒服的副作用。因此,本荟萃分析基于现有的证据基础,比较帕唑帕尼和舒尼替尼作为mRCC治疗的安全性。根据PRISMA指南要求进行系统评价,于2022年1月使用PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library进行文献综述,出版年度至少为10年,成人人群。使用RevMan V.5.4软件对数据进行分析。共有1665名参与者,其中431名患者服用帕唑帕尼,1234名患者服用舒尼替尼,来自8项研究。结果表明,舒尼替尼在手足综合征、恶心/呕吐、皮疹、口炎和粘膜炎症、白细胞减少和血小板减少等几种情况下的副作用比帕唑帕尼更频繁。同时,帕唑帕尼与舒尼替尼在引起疲劳、腹泻、高血压、贫血、肝酶升高等其他副作用方面无显著差异。结论是帕唑帕尼比舒尼替尼疗效更好,副作用更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Assessment of the Safety between Pazopanib and Sunitinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney lesion with approximately 90% of all kidney malignancies and 30% of people with RCC have developed metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Based on European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline, therapy for metastatic RCC (mRCC) patient who cannot tolerate immune checkpoint inhibitor is pazopanib or sunitinib. However, these drugs cause several uncomfortable side effects for the patient. Therefore, this meta-analysis was made, based on the available evidence base, to compare the safety of pazopanib and sunitinib as the treatment of mRCC. Systematic reviews were made in accordance with the PRISMA guideline requirements, a literature review was conducted in January 2022 used PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, publishing year of at least 10 years with an adult population. And the data is analyzed using RevMan V.5.4. In total 1.665 participants, there were 431 patients taking pazopanib and 1.234 patients taking sunitinib from 8 studies. The result shows that sunitinib has more frequent result of side effects than pazopanib in several occasion like hand-foot syndrome, nausea/vomiting, skin rash, stomatitis & mucosal inflammation, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. Meanwhile, there are no significant differences between pazopanib and sunitinib in causing other side effect such as fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, anemia, and increased liver enzymes. The conclusion is that pazopanib is better and has less frequent side effects than sunitinib.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信