调查物理治疗博士学生在流行病相关课程变化中的压力

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
KeithAnn Halle, J. Hastings
{"title":"调查物理治疗博士学生在流行病相关课程变化中的压力","authors":"KeithAnn Halle, J. Hastings","doi":"10.46743/1540-580x/2022.2173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Stress level in physical therapy students has been a focus of research due to multiple documented effects related to physical health, mental health, and ability to learn. Self-reflection has also been a focus of education research, relating it to personal learning, critical thinking, and demonstrable development of professional behaviors and skills. The aim of this study is to investigate student stress in response to programmatic changes wrought by the pandemic and whether stress impacted student self-reflection. Review of literature: Self-reflection is positively associated with growth of professional behavior and academic performance. Student level of self-reflection has been shown to be negatively impacted by stress. Subjects: A convenience sample of 35 students entering the program fall 2019 made up the participants. Methods: Outcome measures were collected six times over two academic years. The Self-Reflection Insight Scale (SRIS) consists of 20 statements rated on a 5-point Likert scale with 3 subscales: need for reflection (N), engaging in reflection (E), and insight (I), scoring from 10 to 100. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a 10-item questionnaire rated on a 4-point Likert scale, scoring from 0 to 40. Results: SRIS scores increased significantly from time 1 to 2, prior to the campus closure; no significant change for times 3 through 6. PSS scores indicated a higher percentage of students reporting a high level of stress at time 3 in the months after campus closure, decreasing significantly from time 3 to 4 during virtual/hybrid learning and increasing from time 5 to 6 as students prepared for clinical internship. No correlation was seen between SRIS and PSS, however a negative correlation was observed between SRIS subscale I and PSS at time 4 and 5. Discussion: Student perceived stress decreased during the study despite a universally stressful time. Student stress increased as students prepared for their first clinical internship experience, consistent with prior research. Initial gains in student self-reflection did not significantly change during the 1.5 years of the pandemic indicating that despite multiple academic and social challenges, students were able to maintain, but not grow, their level of professional self-reflection. Research is needed to further describe the relationship between stress and insight. Conclusion: The Program’s response to pandemic mandates may have positively influenced student stress.","PeriodicalId":45065,"journal":{"name":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Doctor of Physical Therapy Student Stress During Pandemic Related Curricular Changes\",\"authors\":\"KeithAnn Halle, J. Hastings\",\"doi\":\"10.46743/1540-580x/2022.2173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Stress level in physical therapy students has been a focus of research due to multiple documented effects related to physical health, mental health, and ability to learn. Self-reflection has also been a focus of education research, relating it to personal learning, critical thinking, and demonstrable development of professional behaviors and skills. The aim of this study is to investigate student stress in response to programmatic changes wrought by the pandemic and whether stress impacted student self-reflection. Review of literature: Self-reflection is positively associated with growth of professional behavior and academic performance. Student level of self-reflection has been shown to be negatively impacted by stress. Subjects: A convenience sample of 35 students entering the program fall 2019 made up the participants. Methods: Outcome measures were collected six times over two academic years. The Self-Reflection Insight Scale (SRIS) consists of 20 statements rated on a 5-point Likert scale with 3 subscales: need for reflection (N), engaging in reflection (E), and insight (I), scoring from 10 to 100. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a 10-item questionnaire rated on a 4-point Likert scale, scoring from 0 to 40. Results: SRIS scores increased significantly from time 1 to 2, prior to the campus closure; no significant change for times 3 through 6. PSS scores indicated a higher percentage of students reporting a high level of stress at time 3 in the months after campus closure, decreasing significantly from time 3 to 4 during virtual/hybrid learning and increasing from time 5 to 6 as students prepared for clinical internship. No correlation was seen between SRIS and PSS, however a negative correlation was observed between SRIS subscale I and PSS at time 4 and 5. Discussion: Student perceived stress decreased during the study despite a universally stressful time. Student stress increased as students prepared for their first clinical internship experience, consistent with prior research. Initial gains in student self-reflection did not significantly change during the 1.5 years of the pandemic indicating that despite multiple academic and social challenges, students were able to maintain, but not grow, their level of professional self-reflection. Research is needed to further describe the relationship between stress and insight. Conclusion: The Program’s response to pandemic mandates may have positively influenced student stress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2022.2173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2022.2173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物理治疗学生的压力水平一直是研究的焦点,因为有多种文献记载的影响与身体健康、心理健康和学习能力有关。自我反省也一直是教育研究的焦点,它与个人学习、批判性思维以及专业行为和技能的明显发展有关。本研究的目的是调查学生在应对大流行造成的计划变化时的压力,以及压力是否影响了学生的自我反思。文献综述:自我反思与职业行为的成长和学业成绩呈正相关。学生的自我反省水平已被证明会受到压力的负面影响。受试者:35名2019年秋季入学的学生组成了参与者。方法:在两个学年中收集了6次结果测量。自我反思洞察力量表(SRIS)由20个陈述组成,以5分李克特量表评分,其中有3个子量表:反思需求(N),参与反思(E)和洞察力(I),得分从10到100。感知压力量表(PSS-10)是一份包含10个项目的问卷,采用李克特4分制,得分从0到40。结果:校园关闭前时间1 ~ 2,SRIS得分显著升高;乘以3到6没有明显变化。PSS分数表明,在校园关闭后的几个月里,在第3个时间点报告高水平压力的学生比例更高,在虚拟/混合学习期间,从第3到第4个时间点显著下降,在学生准备临床实习时,从第5到第6个时间点显著增加。SRIS与PSS之间无相关性,但SRIS子量表I与PSS在时间4和5时呈负相关。讨论:学生在学习过程中感受到的压力减少了,尽管这是一个普遍的压力时间。与之前的研究一致,学生在准备第一次临床实习经历时,压力增加了。在疫情爆发的一年半时间里,学生自我反思方面的初步进展并没有显著改变,这表明尽管面临着学术和社会方面的多重挑战,学生们能够保持(但没有提高)他们的专业自我反思水平。需要进一步的研究来描述压力和洞察力之间的关系。结论:该方案对流行病任务的反应可能对学生的压力产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating Doctor of Physical Therapy Student Stress During Pandemic Related Curricular Changes
Introduction: Stress level in physical therapy students has been a focus of research due to multiple documented effects related to physical health, mental health, and ability to learn. Self-reflection has also been a focus of education research, relating it to personal learning, critical thinking, and demonstrable development of professional behaviors and skills. The aim of this study is to investigate student stress in response to programmatic changes wrought by the pandemic and whether stress impacted student self-reflection. Review of literature: Self-reflection is positively associated with growth of professional behavior and academic performance. Student level of self-reflection has been shown to be negatively impacted by stress. Subjects: A convenience sample of 35 students entering the program fall 2019 made up the participants. Methods: Outcome measures were collected six times over two academic years. The Self-Reflection Insight Scale (SRIS) consists of 20 statements rated on a 5-point Likert scale with 3 subscales: need for reflection (N), engaging in reflection (E), and insight (I), scoring from 10 to 100. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a 10-item questionnaire rated on a 4-point Likert scale, scoring from 0 to 40. Results: SRIS scores increased significantly from time 1 to 2, prior to the campus closure; no significant change for times 3 through 6. PSS scores indicated a higher percentage of students reporting a high level of stress at time 3 in the months after campus closure, decreasing significantly from time 3 to 4 during virtual/hybrid learning and increasing from time 5 to 6 as students prepared for clinical internship. No correlation was seen between SRIS and PSS, however a negative correlation was observed between SRIS subscale I and PSS at time 4 and 5. Discussion: Student perceived stress decreased during the study despite a universally stressful time. Student stress increased as students prepared for their first clinical internship experience, consistent with prior research. Initial gains in student self-reflection did not significantly change during the 1.5 years of the pandemic indicating that despite multiple academic and social challenges, students were able to maintain, but not grow, their level of professional self-reflection. Research is needed to further describe the relationship between stress and insight. Conclusion: The Program’s response to pandemic mandates may have positively influenced student stress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信