心血管疾病筛查的风险或益处(ROBINSCA):一项基于人群的心血管疾病随机对照筛查试验的基本原理和研究设计

C. M. Aalst, M. Vonder, J. Gratama, H. Adriaansen, D. Kuijpers, Sabine J A M Denissen, P. Harst, R. Braam, P. Dijkman, R. V. Bruggen, F. Beltman, M. Oudkerk, H. J. Koning
{"title":"心血管疾病筛查的风险或益处(ROBINSCA):一项基于人群的心血管疾病随机对照筛查试验的基本原理和研究设计","authors":"C. M. Aalst, M. Vonder, J. Gratama, H. Adriaansen, D. Kuijpers, Sabine J A M Denissen, P. Harst, R. Braam, P. Dijkman, R. V. Bruggen, F. Beltman, M. Oudkerk, H. J. Koning","doi":"10.4172/2167-0870.1000361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This article aims to describe the rationale, study design, and the recruitment process of the Dutch Risk or Benefit in Screening for Cardiovascular Disease (ROBINSCA) trial, worldwide the first population-based randomized-controlled Computed-Tomography (CT) screening trial for cardiovascular disease, powered to detect a benefit of 15% reduced Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) morbidity and mortality. Methods: Addresses of men (aged 45-74 years) and women (aged 55-74 years) were obtained (n=394,058) from the national population registry. All received a mailing with an information brochure, a questionnaire and waist measurement tape and an informed consent form. Asymptomatic people with an expected high-risk for developing CHD were included in this study: 1) a waist circumference of ≥ 102 cm (men) or ≥ 88 cm (women), 2) Body Mass Index of ≥ 30 kg/m2, 3) current smoker and/or 4) a family history of CHD. Eligible respondents were Randomized (1:1:1) to one of the study arms: intervention arm A (screening traditional risk factors), intervention arm B (screening by Coronary Artery Calcium scoring only) or the control arm (usual care). Screened participants with a high risk for developing CHD were referred to the general practitioner for cardiovascular risk management. Linkages with national registries will be performed to measure (CHD-related) morbidity and mortality. Results: A total of 87,866 (22.3%) people responded to the questionnaire, of which 43,447 (49.4%) were Randomized to intervention arm A (n=14,478 (33.3%)), intervention arm B (n=14,450 (33.3%)), or the control arm (n=14,519 (33.4%)). Of those who were considered to be ineligible, one had prior diagnosis of CHD (n=14,156), a medication for hypercholesterolemia and hypertension (n=13,670), no completed informed consent (n=4,490), previous cardiovascular surgery (n=4,146), and/or a CAC score within the last 12 months (n=393). Conclusion: Evidence for net-effectiveness of population-based screening for cardiovascular risk in an asymptomatic population will possibly enable large-scale implementation with large health gains.","PeriodicalId":15375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical trials","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk or Benefit in Screening for Cardiovascular Disease (ROBINSCA): The Rationale and Study Design of a Population-Based Randomized-Controlled Screening Trial for Cardiovascular Disease\",\"authors\":\"C. M. Aalst, M. Vonder, J. Gratama, H. Adriaansen, D. Kuijpers, Sabine J A M Denissen, P. Harst, R. Braam, P. Dijkman, R. V. Bruggen, F. Beltman, M. Oudkerk, H. J. Koning\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2167-0870.1000361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: This article aims to describe the rationale, study design, and the recruitment process of the Dutch Risk or Benefit in Screening for Cardiovascular Disease (ROBINSCA) trial, worldwide the first population-based randomized-controlled Computed-Tomography (CT) screening trial for cardiovascular disease, powered to detect a benefit of 15% reduced Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) morbidity and mortality. Methods: Addresses of men (aged 45-74 years) and women (aged 55-74 years) were obtained (n=394,058) from the national population registry. All received a mailing with an information brochure, a questionnaire and waist measurement tape and an informed consent form. Asymptomatic people with an expected high-risk for developing CHD were included in this study: 1) a waist circumference of ≥ 102 cm (men) or ≥ 88 cm (women), 2) Body Mass Index of ≥ 30 kg/m2, 3) current smoker and/or 4) a family history of CHD. Eligible respondents were Randomized (1:1:1) to one of the study arms: intervention arm A (screening traditional risk factors), intervention arm B (screening by Coronary Artery Calcium scoring only) or the control arm (usual care). Screened participants with a high risk for developing CHD were referred to the general practitioner for cardiovascular risk management. Linkages with national registries will be performed to measure (CHD-related) morbidity and mortality. Results: A total of 87,866 (22.3%) people responded to the questionnaire, of which 43,447 (49.4%) were Randomized to intervention arm A (n=14,478 (33.3%)), intervention arm B (n=14,450 (33.3%)), or the control arm (n=14,519 (33.4%)). Of those who were considered to be ineligible, one had prior diagnosis of CHD (n=14,156), a medication for hypercholesterolemia and hypertension (n=13,670), no completed informed consent (n=4,490), previous cardiovascular surgery (n=4,146), and/or a CAC score within the last 12 months (n=393). Conclusion: Evidence for net-effectiveness of population-based screening for cardiovascular risk in an asymptomatic population will possibly enable large-scale implementation with large health gains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0870.1000361\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0870.1000361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

目的:本文旨在描述荷兰心血管疾病筛查风险或获益试验(ROBINSCA)的基本原理、研究设计和招募过程,该试验是世界上第一个基于人群的随机对照计算机断层扫描(CT)心血管疾病筛查试验,能够检测到冠心病(CHD)发病率和死亡率降低15%的益处。方法:从全国人口登记处获得男性(45-74岁)和女性(55-74岁)的地址(n=394,058)。所有人都收到了一封邮件,里面有一份信息小册子、一份问卷、腰围测量带和一份知情同意书。本研究纳入了预期发生冠心病高危的无症状人群:1)腰围≥102 cm(男性)或≥88 cm(女性),2)体重指数≥30 kg/m2, 3)当前吸烟者和/或4)有冠心病家族史。符合条件的受访者被随机(1:1:1)分配到其中一个研究组:干预组A(筛查传统危险因素),干预组B(仅通过冠状动脉钙评分筛查)或对照组(常规护理)。经过筛选的有冠心病高风险的参与者被转介给全科医生进行心血管风险管理。将与国家登记处建立联系,以衡量(与冠心病相关的)发病率和死亡率。结果:共有87,866人(22.3%)参与问卷调查,其中43,447人(49.4%)被随机分为干预组A (n=14,478(33.3%))、干预组B (n=14,450(33.3%))和对照组(n=14,519(33.4%))。在那些被认为不符合条件的患者中,有1人曾被诊断为冠心病(n=14,156),有高胆固醇血症和高血压的药物治疗(n=13,670),没有完整的知情同意书(n=4,490),既往心血管手术(n=4,146),和/或在过去12个月内有CAC评分(n=393)。结论:在无症状人群中,基于人群的心血管风险筛查的净有效性证据可能使大规模实施具有巨大的健康收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk or Benefit in Screening for Cardiovascular Disease (ROBINSCA): The Rationale and Study Design of a Population-Based Randomized-Controlled Screening Trial for Cardiovascular Disease
Objectives: This article aims to describe the rationale, study design, and the recruitment process of the Dutch Risk or Benefit in Screening for Cardiovascular Disease (ROBINSCA) trial, worldwide the first population-based randomized-controlled Computed-Tomography (CT) screening trial for cardiovascular disease, powered to detect a benefit of 15% reduced Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) morbidity and mortality. Methods: Addresses of men (aged 45-74 years) and women (aged 55-74 years) were obtained (n=394,058) from the national population registry. All received a mailing with an information brochure, a questionnaire and waist measurement tape and an informed consent form. Asymptomatic people with an expected high-risk for developing CHD were included in this study: 1) a waist circumference of ≥ 102 cm (men) or ≥ 88 cm (women), 2) Body Mass Index of ≥ 30 kg/m2, 3) current smoker and/or 4) a family history of CHD. Eligible respondents were Randomized (1:1:1) to one of the study arms: intervention arm A (screening traditional risk factors), intervention arm B (screening by Coronary Artery Calcium scoring only) or the control arm (usual care). Screened participants with a high risk for developing CHD were referred to the general practitioner for cardiovascular risk management. Linkages with national registries will be performed to measure (CHD-related) morbidity and mortality. Results: A total of 87,866 (22.3%) people responded to the questionnaire, of which 43,447 (49.4%) were Randomized to intervention arm A (n=14,478 (33.3%)), intervention arm B (n=14,450 (33.3%)), or the control arm (n=14,519 (33.4%)). Of those who were considered to be ineligible, one had prior diagnosis of CHD (n=14,156), a medication for hypercholesterolemia and hypertension (n=13,670), no completed informed consent (n=4,490), previous cardiovascular surgery (n=4,146), and/or a CAC score within the last 12 months (n=393). Conclusion: Evidence for net-effectiveness of population-based screening for cardiovascular risk in an asymptomatic population will possibly enable large-scale implementation with large health gains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信