第二次世界大战后澳大利亚的微流动性、空间和土著住房计划

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY
Katherine Ellinghaus, Sianan Healy
{"title":"第二次世界大战后澳大利亚的微流动性、空间和土著住房计划","authors":"Katherine Ellinghaus, Sianan Healy","doi":"10.3167/TRANS.2018.080204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines state efforts to assimilate Indigenous peoples through\nthe spatial politics of housing design and the regulation of access to and use\nof houses, streets, and towns. Using two Australian case studies in the 1950s,\nFramlingham Aboriginal Reserve in Victoria and the Gap housing development\nin the Northern Territory, and inspired by recent scholarship on imperial\nnetworks and Indigenous mobilities, it explores Aboriginal people’s\nnegotiation of those efforts through practices of both moving and staying put.\nWe demonstrate the importance of micromobility—which we define as smallscale\nmovements across short distances, in and out of buildings, along roads,\nand across townships—and argue that in order to fully appreciate the regulation\nof Indigenous mobility and Indigenous resistance to it, scholars must concentrate\non the small, local, and seemingly insignificant as well as more drastic\nand permanent movement.","PeriodicalId":43789,"journal":{"name":"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Micromobility, Space, and Indigenous Housing Schemes in Australia after World War II\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Ellinghaus, Sianan Healy\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/TRANS.2018.080204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines state efforts to assimilate Indigenous peoples through\\nthe spatial politics of housing design and the regulation of access to and use\\nof houses, streets, and towns. Using two Australian case studies in the 1950s,\\nFramlingham Aboriginal Reserve in Victoria and the Gap housing development\\nin the Northern Territory, and inspired by recent scholarship on imperial\\nnetworks and Indigenous mobilities, it explores Aboriginal people’s\\nnegotiation of those efforts through practices of both moving and staying put.\\nWe demonstrate the importance of micromobility—which we define as smallscale\\nmovements across short distances, in and out of buildings, along roads,\\nand across townships—and argue that in order to fully appreciate the regulation\\nof Indigenous mobility and Indigenous resistance to it, scholars must concentrate\\non the small, local, and seemingly insignificant as well as more drastic\\nand permanent movement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/TRANS.2018.080204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/TRANS.2018.080204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文考察了国家通过住房设计的空间政治以及对房屋、街道和城镇的进出和使用的规定来同化土著人民的努力。通过20世纪50年代澳大利亚的两个案例研究,维多利亚的弗拉姆灵厄姆土著保护区和北领地的盖普住房开发,并受到最近关于帝国网络和土著流动的学术研究的启发,它探索了土著人民通过迁移和留在原处的实践来谈判这些努力。我们论证了微迁移的重要性——我们将其定义为短距离、进出建筑物、沿着道路和穿过城镇的小规模迁移——并认为,为了充分理解土著迁移的规律和土著对它的抵制,学者们必须把注意力集中在小型的、地方性的、看似无关紧要的以及更激烈的、永久性的迁移上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Micromobility, Space, and Indigenous Housing Schemes in Australia after World War II
This article examines state efforts to assimilate Indigenous peoples through the spatial politics of housing design and the regulation of access to and use of houses, streets, and towns. Using two Australian case studies in the 1950s, Framlingham Aboriginal Reserve in Victoria and the Gap housing development in the Northern Territory, and inspired by recent scholarship on imperial networks and Indigenous mobilities, it explores Aboriginal people’s negotiation of those efforts through practices of both moving and staying put. We demonstrate the importance of micromobility—which we define as smallscale movements across short distances, in and out of buildings, along roads, and across townships—and argue that in order to fully appreciate the regulation of Indigenous mobility and Indigenous resistance to it, scholars must concentrate on the small, local, and seemingly insignificant as well as more drastic and permanent movement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信