抗功率分析数字电路的比较

E. Menendez, K. Mai
{"title":"抗功率分析数字电路的比较","authors":"E. Menendez, K. Mai","doi":"10.1109/HST.2010.5513112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Power analysis attacks are a common and effective method of defeating cryptographic systems. Many power-analysis-resistant digital circuit techniques have been previously proposed, leaving the circuit designer a myriad of choices without a simple way to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of each technique. In this paper, we compare four promising power-analysis-resistant digital logic styles against a standard CMOS baseline. By comparing these techniques side by side in a consistent manner we present a clearer picture of the advantages and drawbacks of each. Results are presented for logic gate area, energy consumption, and power-analysis resistance. We also present a novel test structure suitable for measuring power-analysis resistance of individual logic gates in actual silicon.","PeriodicalId":6367,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST)","volume":"54 1","pages":"64-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of power-analysis-resistant digital circuits\",\"authors\":\"E. Menendez, K. Mai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HST.2010.5513112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Power analysis attacks are a common and effective method of defeating cryptographic systems. Many power-analysis-resistant digital circuit techniques have been previously proposed, leaving the circuit designer a myriad of choices without a simple way to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of each technique. In this paper, we compare four promising power-analysis-resistant digital logic styles against a standard CMOS baseline. By comparing these techniques side by side in a consistent manner we present a clearer picture of the advantages and drawbacks of each. Results are presented for logic gate area, energy consumption, and power-analysis resistance. We also present a novel test structure suitable for measuring power-analysis resistance of individual logic gates in actual silicon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST)\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"64-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HST.2010.5513112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HST.2010.5513112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

功率分析攻击是破解密码系统的一种常见而有效的方法。许多抗功率分析的数字电路技术已经被提出,这给电路设计者留下了无数的选择,没有一个简单的方法来比较和对比每种技术的优缺点。在本文中,我们比较了四种有前途的抗功耗分析数字逻辑风格与标准CMOS基线。通过以一致的方式并排比较这些技术,我们更清楚地展示了每种技术的优点和缺点。给出了逻辑门面积、能耗和功率分析电阻的计算结果。我们还提出了一种新的测试结构,适用于测量实际硅中单个逻辑门的功率分析电阻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of power-analysis-resistant digital circuits
Power analysis attacks are a common and effective method of defeating cryptographic systems. Many power-analysis-resistant digital circuit techniques have been previously proposed, leaving the circuit designer a myriad of choices without a simple way to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of each technique. In this paper, we compare four promising power-analysis-resistant digital logic styles against a standard CMOS baseline. By comparing these techniques side by side in a consistent manner we present a clearer picture of the advantages and drawbacks of each. Results are presented for logic gate area, energy consumption, and power-analysis resistance. We also present a novel test structure suitable for measuring power-analysis resistance of individual logic gates in actual silicon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信