综合口腔护理方案和0.2%氯己定联合牙刷漱口方案对机械通气插管患者口腔健康的影响:一项临床试验

Fatemeh Kord Salarzehi, Alireza Rahat Dahmardeh, Seyed Mohammad Nasiodin Tabatabaei, F. Yaghoubinia
{"title":"综合口腔护理方案和0.2%氯己定联合牙刷漱口方案对机械通气插管患者口腔健康的影响:一项临床试验","authors":"Fatemeh Kord Salarzehi, Alireza Rahat Dahmardeh, Seyed Mohammad Nasiodin Tabatabaei, F. Yaghoubinia","doi":"10.5812/MSNJ.114194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients’ oral health is impaired in Intensive Care units (ICUs) due to loss of consciousness, open mouth, intubation, and mechanical ventilation. Objectives: The current study aimed to compare the effects of comprehensive and combined programs on oral health in patients under mechanical ventilation. Methods: This single-blind clinical trial with three groups was performed on 90 patients with mechanical ventilation admitted to ICUs of medical centers affiliated to the Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in 2020. Patients under mechanical ventilation were randomly divided into three groups, including those receiving a comprehensive program, those receiving a combined program, and controls through permutated blocks. In the two intervention groups, oral care was performed for 5 minutes, three times per day, during the 5 days of the study with a specific method. The control group received routine oral care. The patients’ oral health was measured once before the intervention and then every day until the fifth day of the intervention using the Beck Oral Assessment scale. The data were analyzed using the analysis of variance and chi-square in IBM SPSS Statistics software version 26. Results: The mean oral health score in the three groups was not significantly different before the intervention and on the second day of the study (P > 0.05). However, on the third to fifth days of the study, the oral health score in the two intervention groups showed a significant decrease compared to the control group, indicating an oral health improvement in these groups (P = 0.001). The mean oral health score in the control group increased during the study days. Conclusions: Comprehensive care and combination methods can improve oral health in patients under mechanical ventilation. Nurses are recommended to use regular and codified oral care methods.","PeriodicalId":18480,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a Comprehensive Oral Care Program and a Combined Toothbrush and Mouthwash Program with 0.2% Chlorhexidine on Oral Health in Mechanically Ventilated Intubated Patients: A Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Kord Salarzehi, Alireza Rahat Dahmardeh, Seyed Mohammad Nasiodin Tabatabaei, F. Yaghoubinia\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/MSNJ.114194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Patients’ oral health is impaired in Intensive Care units (ICUs) due to loss of consciousness, open mouth, intubation, and mechanical ventilation. Objectives: The current study aimed to compare the effects of comprehensive and combined programs on oral health in patients under mechanical ventilation. Methods: This single-blind clinical trial with three groups was performed on 90 patients with mechanical ventilation admitted to ICUs of medical centers affiliated to the Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in 2020. Patients under mechanical ventilation were randomly divided into three groups, including those receiving a comprehensive program, those receiving a combined program, and controls through permutated blocks. In the two intervention groups, oral care was performed for 5 minutes, three times per day, during the 5 days of the study with a specific method. The control group received routine oral care. The patients’ oral health was measured once before the intervention and then every day until the fifth day of the intervention using the Beck Oral Assessment scale. The data were analyzed using the analysis of variance and chi-square in IBM SPSS Statistics software version 26. Results: The mean oral health score in the three groups was not significantly different before the intervention and on the second day of the study (P > 0.05). However, on the third to fifth days of the study, the oral health score in the two intervention groups showed a significant decrease compared to the control group, indicating an oral health improvement in these groups (P = 0.001). The mean oral health score in the control group increased during the study days. Conclusions: Comprehensive care and combination methods can improve oral health in patients under mechanical ventilation. Nurses are recommended to use regular and codified oral care methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/MSNJ.114194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/MSNJ.114194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:重症监护病房(icu)患者由于意识丧失、张嘴、插管和机械通气而导致口腔健康受损。目的:本研究旨在比较综合方案和联合方案对机械通气患者口腔健康的影响。方法:对2020年伊朗扎黑丹医科大学附属医疗中心icu收治的机械通气患者90例进行三组单盲临床试验。机械通气患者随机分为三组,包括接受综合方案组、接受联合方案组和通过排列阻滞的对照组。在两个干预组中,在研究的5天内,以特定的方法进行口腔护理,每次5分钟,每天3次。对照组给予常规口腔护理。在干预前对患者口腔健康进行一次测量,然后每天使用贝克口腔评估量表进行测量,直到干预第5天。采用IBM SPSS统计软件26版进行方差分析和卡方分析。结果:三组患者在干预前和研究第2天的口腔健康评分均值比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。然而,在研究的第三至第五天,两个干预组的口腔健康评分与对照组相比显着下降,表明这些组的口腔健康有所改善(P = 0.001)。对照组的平均口腔健康评分在研究期间有所增加。结论:综合护理和综合措施可改善机械通气患者的口腔健康状况。建议护士使用常规和规范的口腔护理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of a Comprehensive Oral Care Program and a Combined Toothbrush and Mouthwash Program with 0.2% Chlorhexidine on Oral Health in Mechanically Ventilated Intubated Patients: A Clinical Trial
Background: Patients’ oral health is impaired in Intensive Care units (ICUs) due to loss of consciousness, open mouth, intubation, and mechanical ventilation. Objectives: The current study aimed to compare the effects of comprehensive and combined programs on oral health in patients under mechanical ventilation. Methods: This single-blind clinical trial with three groups was performed on 90 patients with mechanical ventilation admitted to ICUs of medical centers affiliated to the Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in 2020. Patients under mechanical ventilation were randomly divided into three groups, including those receiving a comprehensive program, those receiving a combined program, and controls through permutated blocks. In the two intervention groups, oral care was performed for 5 minutes, three times per day, during the 5 days of the study with a specific method. The control group received routine oral care. The patients’ oral health was measured once before the intervention and then every day until the fifth day of the intervention using the Beck Oral Assessment scale. The data were analyzed using the analysis of variance and chi-square in IBM SPSS Statistics software version 26. Results: The mean oral health score in the three groups was not significantly different before the intervention and on the second day of the study (P > 0.05). However, on the third to fifth days of the study, the oral health score in the two intervention groups showed a significant decrease compared to the control group, indicating an oral health improvement in these groups (P = 0.001). The mean oral health score in the control group increased during the study days. Conclusions: Comprehensive care and combination methods can improve oral health in patients under mechanical ventilation. Nurses are recommended to use regular and codified oral care methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信