词汇等级验证方法研究

Soyoung Choi, Taejoon Park, Jinho Park
{"title":"词汇等级验证方法研究","authors":"Soyoung Choi, Taejoon Park, Jinho Park","doi":"10.51157/kmor.2023.25.1.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, a new method was designed and verified to verify the validity of the 'vocabulary grading list', which selected and graded educational vocabulary to support systematic vocabulary teaching and learning in school education. As a verification method, the following two-way method was devised. First, as a way to expand language life beyond school education, it is a way to verify validity by checking whether the vocabulary grade to be verified is a level that appropriately reflects general language life in the wider world than school education. To implement this plan, a hierarchy of vocabulary extracted from a large-scale corpus, which is a new basic data, was set up and a method of comparative analysis with the grade of this study was designed. Second, it is a convergent method to verify the validity by focusing more on the educational purpose of the vocabulary grade and checking whether it is a level that can explain specific teaching-learning aspects of school education. To implement this plan, a method was designed to reveal the degree of linkage with textbook text readability levels of various subjects through correlation analysis and regression analysis. As a result of the verification, the vocabulary grade of this study was quite consistent with the lexical hierarchy extracted based on the large-scale corpus and the level of readability evaluation of textbook texts, but showed a tendency to show a high degree of concordance, especially in low-level easy vocabulary, and the verification result index was poor. If not, they showed mutual similarity. Through this, it was confirmed that the verification method of this study was partially effective, and it could be said that it was a useful verification result in that it consistently informs the direction of supplementation of the vocabulary ranking list. The vocabulary grade verification method explored in this study is meaningful in that it improved the empirical quality of vocabulary grade setting and grade verification.","PeriodicalId":74228,"journal":{"name":"Morphology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on Verification Methods of Vocabulary Grade\",\"authors\":\"Soyoung Choi, Taejoon Park, Jinho Park\",\"doi\":\"10.51157/kmor.2023.25.1.57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, a new method was designed and verified to verify the validity of the 'vocabulary grading list', which selected and graded educational vocabulary to support systematic vocabulary teaching and learning in school education. As a verification method, the following two-way method was devised. First, as a way to expand language life beyond school education, it is a way to verify validity by checking whether the vocabulary grade to be verified is a level that appropriately reflects general language life in the wider world than school education. To implement this plan, a hierarchy of vocabulary extracted from a large-scale corpus, which is a new basic data, was set up and a method of comparative analysis with the grade of this study was designed. Second, it is a convergent method to verify the validity by focusing more on the educational purpose of the vocabulary grade and checking whether it is a level that can explain specific teaching-learning aspects of school education. To implement this plan, a method was designed to reveal the degree of linkage with textbook text readability levels of various subjects through correlation analysis and regression analysis. As a result of the verification, the vocabulary grade of this study was quite consistent with the lexical hierarchy extracted based on the large-scale corpus and the level of readability evaluation of textbook texts, but showed a tendency to show a high degree of concordance, especially in low-level easy vocabulary, and the verification result index was poor. If not, they showed mutual similarity. Through this, it was confirmed that the verification method of this study was partially effective, and it could be said that it was a useful verification result in that it consistently informs the direction of supplementation of the vocabulary ranking list. The vocabulary grade verification method explored in this study is meaningful in that it improved the empirical quality of vocabulary grade setting and grade verification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Morphology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Morphology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51157/kmor.2023.25.1.57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Morphology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51157/kmor.2023.25.1.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究设计并验证了一种新的方法来验证“词汇分级表”的有效性,该分级表对教育词汇进行筛选和分级,以支持学校教育中系统的词汇教学。作为验证方法,我们设计了如下的双向方法:首先,作为一种扩展学校教育之外的语言生活的方式,通过检查待验证的词汇等级是否在比学校教育更广阔的世界中恰当地反映了一般语言生活的水平来验证有效性。为了实现这一计划,从大规模语料库中提取新的基础数据,建立了词汇层次结构,并设计了与本研究等级对比分析的方法。其次,通过更加关注词汇等级的教育目的,检查词汇等级是否能够解释学校教育的具体教与学方面的水平来验证有效性,是一种趋同的方法。为了实现这一计划,设计了一种方法,通过相关分析和回归分析来揭示各学科与教科书文本可读性水平的关联程度。经验证,本研究的词汇等级与基于大规模语料库和教科书文本可读性评价水平提取的词汇层次相当一致,但呈现出高度一致的趋势,特别是在低层次易读词汇上,验证结果指标较差。如果不是,它们表现出了相互的相似性。通过这一点,证实了本研究的验证方法是部分有效的,可以说这是一个有用的验证结果,它一致地告知了词汇排名表的补充方向。本研究探索的词汇等级验证方法对于提高词汇等级设置和等级验证的经验质量具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on Verification Methods of Vocabulary Grade
In this study, a new method was designed and verified to verify the validity of the 'vocabulary grading list', which selected and graded educational vocabulary to support systematic vocabulary teaching and learning in school education. As a verification method, the following two-way method was devised. First, as a way to expand language life beyond school education, it is a way to verify validity by checking whether the vocabulary grade to be verified is a level that appropriately reflects general language life in the wider world than school education. To implement this plan, a hierarchy of vocabulary extracted from a large-scale corpus, which is a new basic data, was set up and a method of comparative analysis with the grade of this study was designed. Second, it is a convergent method to verify the validity by focusing more on the educational purpose of the vocabulary grade and checking whether it is a level that can explain specific teaching-learning aspects of school education. To implement this plan, a method was designed to reveal the degree of linkage with textbook text readability levels of various subjects through correlation analysis and regression analysis. As a result of the verification, the vocabulary grade of this study was quite consistent with the lexical hierarchy extracted based on the large-scale corpus and the level of readability evaluation of textbook texts, but showed a tendency to show a high degree of concordance, especially in low-level easy vocabulary, and the verification result index was poor. If not, they showed mutual similarity. Through this, it was confirmed that the verification method of this study was partially effective, and it could be said that it was a useful verification result in that it consistently informs the direction of supplementation of the vocabulary ranking list. The vocabulary grade verification method explored in this study is meaningful in that it improved the empirical quality of vocabulary grade setting and grade verification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信