以1.8-桉树醇为例,改进了对浮游菌和固定菌的抗生素作用鉴定方法

Kaltschmidt C, S. H., Brotzmann V, Schuermann M, Kaltschmidt B
{"title":"以1.8-桉树醇为例,改进了对浮游菌和固定菌的抗生素作用鉴定方法","authors":"Kaltschmidt C, S. H., Brotzmann V, Schuermann M, Kaltschmidt B","doi":"10.4172/1948-5948.1000373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Screening of antibiotic substances is a mandatory working step during drug development. A variety of methods are available to test their efficiency, they can be divided into diffusion and dilution methods. Diffusion methods in agar based media are rather qualitative approaches, whereas dilution methods, commonly executed in polystyrene microtiter plates, are frequently used to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC50) in a quantitative way. During these standardized assays the physical properties of the agent, e.g. its hydrophobic properties and thermal instability, are often neglected. This study compares different diffusion assays for their sensitivity and improved dilution assays in respect to the thermal sensitivity and the hydrophobic character of antibiotics. We applied 1.8-cineol, a hydrophobic antibacterial component of essential oils, on the pathogen Staphylococcus aureus and investigated the influence of incubation time, cell culture vessels and commonly employed surfactants on the assay. The presented study describes an optimized diffusion assay and a protocol for the exact determination of the MIC and MBIC50 of thermally instable hydrophobic antibiotic substances. Our assays can be easily executed since they are based on optical density measurements and simple crystal violet staining. We conclude that preliminary screenings of hydrophobic substances can be executed by the well diffusion method. However, for the determination of the MIC and MBIC50 we highly recommend the application of cleaned and etched glass tubes instead of polystyrene cell culture plates. The usage of the surfactants Tween 80 or Tween 20 was found unnecessary and furthermore falsifying the results. Taken together our improved standard techniques may help to better quantify the antimicrobial potential of hydrophobic antibiotics, e.g. essential oils. This may give new insights into the mode of action and furthermore enable the development of new antimicrobial substances urgently needed to fight resistances against common antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":16453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology","volume":"116 1","pages":"249-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Assays to Identify the Antibiotic Effects on Planktonic and Sessile Bacteria Using the Example of 1.8-Cineol\",\"authors\":\"Kaltschmidt C, S. H., Brotzmann V, Schuermann M, Kaltschmidt B\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/1948-5948.1000373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Screening of antibiotic substances is a mandatory working step during drug development. A variety of methods are available to test their efficiency, they can be divided into diffusion and dilution methods. Diffusion methods in agar based media are rather qualitative approaches, whereas dilution methods, commonly executed in polystyrene microtiter plates, are frequently used to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC50) in a quantitative way. During these standardized assays the physical properties of the agent, e.g. its hydrophobic properties and thermal instability, are often neglected. This study compares different diffusion assays for their sensitivity and improved dilution assays in respect to the thermal sensitivity and the hydrophobic character of antibiotics. We applied 1.8-cineol, a hydrophobic antibacterial component of essential oils, on the pathogen Staphylococcus aureus and investigated the influence of incubation time, cell culture vessels and commonly employed surfactants on the assay. The presented study describes an optimized diffusion assay and a protocol for the exact determination of the MIC and MBIC50 of thermally instable hydrophobic antibiotic substances. Our assays can be easily executed since they are based on optical density measurements and simple crystal violet staining. We conclude that preliminary screenings of hydrophobic substances can be executed by the well diffusion method. However, for the determination of the MIC and MBIC50 we highly recommend the application of cleaned and etched glass tubes instead of polystyrene cell culture plates. The usage of the surfactants Tween 80 or Tween 20 was found unnecessary and furthermore falsifying the results. Taken together our improved standard techniques may help to better quantify the antimicrobial potential of hydrophobic antibiotics, e.g. essential oils. This may give new insights into the mode of action and furthermore enable the development of new antimicrobial substances urgently needed to fight resistances against common antibiotics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"249-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

抗生素物质的筛选是药物开发过程中必不可少的工作步骤。有多种方法可用于测试其效率,它们可分为扩散法和稀释法。琼脂培养基中的扩散法是相当定性的方法,而稀释法通常在聚苯乙烯微滴板中执行,经常用于定量确定最小抑制浓度(MIC)和最小生物膜抑制浓度(MBIC50)。在这些标准化分析中,药剂的物理性质,例如疏水性和热不稳定性,往往被忽略。本研究比较了不同扩散法的敏感性和改进稀释法对抗生素的热敏性和疏水性的影响。我们将精油中的疏水抗菌成分1.8-桉树醇应用于病原菌金黄色葡萄球菌,并研究了培养时间、细胞培养容器和常用表面活性剂对实验的影响。本研究描述了一种优化的扩散试验和一种精确测定热不稳定疏水抗生素物质的MIC和MBIC50的方案。我们的分析可以很容易地执行,因为它们是基于光学密度测量和简单的结晶紫染色。我们得出结论,疏水物质的初步筛选可以通过孔扩散法进行。然而,对于MIC和MBIC50的测定,我们强烈建议使用清洁和蚀刻玻璃管代替聚苯乙烯细胞培养板。发现表面活性剂Tween 80或Tween 20的使用是不必要的,进一步伪造了结果。总之,我们改进的标准技术可能有助于更好地量化疏水抗生素的抗菌潜力,例如精油。这可能为作用方式提供新的见解,并进一步促进开发新的抗微生物物质,以对抗常见抗生素的耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved Assays to Identify the Antibiotic Effects on Planktonic and Sessile Bacteria Using the Example of 1.8-Cineol
Screening of antibiotic substances is a mandatory working step during drug development. A variety of methods are available to test their efficiency, they can be divided into diffusion and dilution methods. Diffusion methods in agar based media are rather qualitative approaches, whereas dilution methods, commonly executed in polystyrene microtiter plates, are frequently used to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC50) in a quantitative way. During these standardized assays the physical properties of the agent, e.g. its hydrophobic properties and thermal instability, are often neglected. This study compares different diffusion assays for their sensitivity and improved dilution assays in respect to the thermal sensitivity and the hydrophobic character of antibiotics. We applied 1.8-cineol, a hydrophobic antibacterial component of essential oils, on the pathogen Staphylococcus aureus and investigated the influence of incubation time, cell culture vessels and commonly employed surfactants on the assay. The presented study describes an optimized diffusion assay and a protocol for the exact determination of the MIC and MBIC50 of thermally instable hydrophobic antibiotic substances. Our assays can be easily executed since they are based on optical density measurements and simple crystal violet staining. We conclude that preliminary screenings of hydrophobic substances can be executed by the well diffusion method. However, for the determination of the MIC and MBIC50 we highly recommend the application of cleaned and etched glass tubes instead of polystyrene cell culture plates. The usage of the surfactants Tween 80 or Tween 20 was found unnecessary and furthermore falsifying the results. Taken together our improved standard techniques may help to better quantify the antimicrobial potential of hydrophobic antibiotics, e.g. essential oils. This may give new insights into the mode of action and furthermore enable the development of new antimicrobial substances urgently needed to fight resistances against common antibiotics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信