合并基于规则的信念数据库

R. Wehbe
{"title":"合并基于规则的信念数据库","authors":"R. Wehbe","doi":"10.7892/BORIS.26458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of revising a belief database is treated in many classical works. We will consider here the problem of merging two belief databases (BDBs for short) Ψ1 and Ψ2, operation that will be denoted by Ψ1 Ψ2, and whose result will be a new BDB. Since belief not necessarily reflects the actual state of the world (as opposed to knowledge), both BDBs could be incompatible. The goal is to construct a new BDB trying to retain as much as possible of the original beliefs of Ψ1 and Ψ2.","PeriodicalId":91205,"journal":{"name":"Artificial intelligence and applications (Commerce, Calif.)","volume":"40 1","pages":"630-635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Merging rule-based belief databases\",\"authors\":\"R. Wehbe\",\"doi\":\"10.7892/BORIS.26458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of revising a belief database is treated in many classical works. We will consider here the problem of merging two belief databases (BDBs for short) Ψ1 and Ψ2, operation that will be denoted by Ψ1 Ψ2, and whose result will be a new BDB. Since belief not necessarily reflects the actual state of the world (as opposed to knowledge), both BDBs could be incompatible. The goal is to construct a new BDB trying to retain as much as possible of the original beliefs of Ψ1 and Ψ2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial intelligence and applications (Commerce, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"630-635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial intelligence and applications (Commerce, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7892/BORIS.26458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial intelligence and applications (Commerce, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7892/BORIS.26458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

许多经典著作都讨论了信念数据库的修正问题。我们将在这里考虑合并两个信念数据库(简称BDB) Ψ1和Ψ2的问题,操作将用Ψ1 Ψ2表示,其结果将生成一个新的BDB。由于信念不一定反映世界的实际状态(与知识相反),因此两种bdb可能是不相容的。我们的目标是构建一个新的BDB,尽量保留Ψ1和Ψ2的原始信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Merging rule-based belief databases
The problem of revising a belief database is treated in many classical works. We will consider here the problem of merging two belief databases (BDBs for short) Ψ1 and Ψ2, operation that will be denoted by Ψ1 Ψ2, and whose result will be a new BDB. Since belief not necessarily reflects the actual state of the world (as opposed to knowledge), both BDBs could be incompatible. The goal is to construct a new BDB trying to retain as much as possible of the original beliefs of Ψ1 and Ψ2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信