道家对换位思考的诠释

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Charlene Tan
{"title":"道家对换位思考的诠释","authors":"Charlene Tan","doi":"10.1080/13617672.2022.2131091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Offering a Daoist interpretation of perspective-taking, this article expounds the philosophical thought of Zhuangzi on this topic. Zhuangzi’s views can be consolidated into two broad areas: the challenge of perspective-taking and recommendations to foster perspective-taking. A primary hindrance, according to Zhuangzi, is limited human perspective that results in narrow-mindedness, dogmatism, self-serving moral standard and disharmony among humans. To advance perspective-taking, Zhuangzi introduces three essential Daoist concepts: ‘having no fixed identity’, ‘following the Heavenly and attaining dao’ and ‘matching of dao (Course or Way)’. Zhuangzi cautions against embracing a rigid perspective by being inflexible, dogmatic and judgemental in one’s thinking, actions and relationships. Humans should instead (re)turn to their natural disposition and harmonise their perspectives with those of others. A key implication of Zhuangzi’s philosophical thought sketched in this essay is a formulation of perspective-taking that emphasises self-transformation and social harmony.","PeriodicalId":45928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education","volume":"9 1","pages":"349 - 362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Daoist interpretation of perspective-taking\",\"authors\":\"Charlene Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13617672.2022.2131091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Offering a Daoist interpretation of perspective-taking, this article expounds the philosophical thought of Zhuangzi on this topic. Zhuangzi’s views can be consolidated into two broad areas: the challenge of perspective-taking and recommendations to foster perspective-taking. A primary hindrance, according to Zhuangzi, is limited human perspective that results in narrow-mindedness, dogmatism, self-serving moral standard and disharmony among humans. To advance perspective-taking, Zhuangzi introduces three essential Daoist concepts: ‘having no fixed identity’, ‘following the Heavenly and attaining dao’ and ‘matching of dao (Course or Way)’. Zhuangzi cautions against embracing a rigid perspective by being inflexible, dogmatic and judgemental in one’s thinking, actions and relationships. Humans should instead (re)turn to their natural disposition and harmonise their perspectives with those of others. A key implication of Zhuangzi’s philosophical thought sketched in this essay is a formulation of perspective-taking that emphasises self-transformation and social harmony.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"349 - 362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2022.2131091\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2022.2131091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文从道家角度对换位思考进行阐释,阐述庄子关于换位思考的哲学思想。庄子的观点可以整合为两大领域:换位思考的挑战和培养换位思考的建议。庄子认为,主要的障碍是人的视野有限,导致人的心胸狭窄、教条主义、道德标准自私和人与人之间的不和谐。庄子介绍了三个基本的道家概念:“无固定身份”、“顺天而得道”和“道相合”。庄子告诫人们不要抱着僵化的观点,不要在思想、行为和人际关系上表现得死板、教条和武断。相反,人类应该回归自己的天性,使自己的观点与他人的观点相协调。本文概述了庄子哲学思想的一个重要含义,即强调自我转化和社会和谐的换位思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Daoist interpretation of perspective-taking
ABSTRACT Offering a Daoist interpretation of perspective-taking, this article expounds the philosophical thought of Zhuangzi on this topic. Zhuangzi’s views can be consolidated into two broad areas: the challenge of perspective-taking and recommendations to foster perspective-taking. A primary hindrance, according to Zhuangzi, is limited human perspective that results in narrow-mindedness, dogmatism, self-serving moral standard and disharmony among humans. To advance perspective-taking, Zhuangzi introduces three essential Daoist concepts: ‘having no fixed identity’, ‘following the Heavenly and attaining dao’ and ‘matching of dao (Course or Way)’. Zhuangzi cautions against embracing a rigid perspective by being inflexible, dogmatic and judgemental in one’s thinking, actions and relationships. Humans should instead (re)turn to their natural disposition and harmonise their perspectives with those of others. A key implication of Zhuangzi’s philosophical thought sketched in this essay is a formulation of perspective-taking that emphasises self-transformation and social harmony.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信