自发对话中话语标记的组合

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
REVUE ROMANE Pub Date : 2018-08-10 DOI:10.1075/rro.00008.pon
Salvador Pons Bordería
{"title":"自发对话中话语标记的组合","authors":"Salvador Pons Bordería","doi":"10.1075/rro.00008.pon","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper attempts to establish some basis for the combination of discourse markers in conversations. The analysis presented here will be based on Spanish spontaneous conversations and will make use of the Val.Es.Co model of discourse units developed in the last ten years (Briz et al. 2003; Grupo Val.Es.Co 2014) and a corpus of spontaneous conversations. As a result, patterns of combination of DMs will be established; some types of combinations will be described, and a distinction will be drawn between lexicalization of DMs, adjacency of DMs in two neighboring discourse units, and combination proper. In addition, some places are favored for the combination of discourse markers: the initial positions of the discourse units act and intervention. Binary combinations are preferred to ternary or 4-ary combinations. Finally, DMs with textual functions are preferred in the combinations studied when compared to modal or interpersonal DMs.","PeriodicalId":42193,"journal":{"name":"REVUE ROMANE","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The combination of discourse markers in spontaneous conversations\",\"authors\":\"Salvador Pons Bordería\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/rro.00008.pon\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper attempts to establish some basis for the combination of discourse markers in conversations. The analysis presented here will be based on Spanish spontaneous conversations and will make use of the Val.Es.Co model of discourse units developed in the last ten years (Briz et al. 2003; Grupo Val.Es.Co 2014) and a corpus of spontaneous conversations. As a result, patterns of combination of DMs will be established; some types of combinations will be described, and a distinction will be drawn between lexicalization of DMs, adjacency of DMs in two neighboring discourse units, and combination proper. In addition, some places are favored for the combination of discourse markers: the initial positions of the discourse units act and intervention. Binary combinations are preferred to ternary or 4-ary combinations. Finally, DMs with textual functions are preferred in the combinations studied when compared to modal or interpersonal DMs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVUE ROMANE\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVUE ROMANE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.00008.pon\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE ROMANE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.00008.pon","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文试图为话语标记语在会话中的组合提供一些依据。本文的分析将以西班牙语自发对话为基础,并将利用value . es . co在过去十年中开发的话语单位模型(Briz et al. 2003;Grupo vales . co 2014)和一个自发对话的语料库。因此,将建立各种发展管理办法的组合模式;一些类型的组合将被描述,并将区分词法化的dm,相邻的两个话语单位的dm的邻接,和组合适当。此外,一些地方有利于话语标记的组合:话语单位的初始位置作为和干预。二进制组合优于三元或四元组合。最后,在组合研究中,与情态或人际关系dm相比,具有语篇功能的dm更受青睐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The combination of discourse markers in spontaneous conversations
This paper attempts to establish some basis for the combination of discourse markers in conversations. The analysis presented here will be based on Spanish spontaneous conversations and will make use of the Val.Es.Co model of discourse units developed in the last ten years (Briz et al. 2003; Grupo Val.Es.Co 2014) and a corpus of spontaneous conversations. As a result, patterns of combination of DMs will be established; some types of combinations will be described, and a distinction will be drawn between lexicalization of DMs, adjacency of DMs in two neighboring discourse units, and combination proper. In addition, some places are favored for the combination of discourse markers: the initial positions of the discourse units act and intervention. Binary combinations are preferred to ternary or 4-ary combinations. Finally, DMs with textual functions are preferred in the combinations studied when compared to modal or interpersonal DMs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REVUE ROMANE
REVUE ROMANE Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信