基本收入试点:用途、限制和设计原则

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS

Basic Income Studies Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1515/bis-2021-0021

G. Standing

{"title":"基本收入试点:用途、限制和设计原则","authors":"G. Standing","doi":"10.1515/bis-2021-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The position underlying this article is that while pilots are not strictly required to justify moving in the direction of a basic income system, nevertheless they can play several useful functions in the debate. These include rebutting common preconceptions, for instance that basic income will make people ‘lazy’, indicating non-monetary benefits such as improved health and wellbeing, and testing how a basic income might best be introduced in a given region, country or city. In that context the article goes on to present 19 guiding principles for the design, implementation and evaluation of basic income pilots, with examples of selected experiments and pilots past and present.","PeriodicalId":43898,"journal":{"name":"Basic Income Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"75 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basic Income Pilots: Uses, Limitations and Design Principles\",\"authors\":\"G. Standing\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/bis-2021-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The position underlying this article is that while pilots are not strictly required to justify moving in the direction of a basic income system, nevertheless they can play several useful functions in the debate. These include rebutting common preconceptions, for instance that basic income will make people ‘lazy’, indicating non-monetary benefits such as improved health and wellbeing, and testing how a basic income might best be introduced in a given region, country or city. In that context the article goes on to present 19 guiding principles for the design, implementation and evaluation of basic income pilots, with examples of selected experiments and pilots past and present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic Income Studies\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"75 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic Income Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2021-0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic Income Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2021-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

本文的基本立场是，虽然试点并不需要严格证明向基本收入制度方向发展的合理性，但它们可以在辩论中发挥一些有用的作用。这些措施包括反驳普遍的先入之见，例如基本收入会让人“懒惰”，指出改善健康和福祉等非货币效益，以及测试如何在特定地区、国家或城市引入基本收入是最好的。在这种背景下，文章继续提出了19项基本收入试点的设计、实施和评估指导原则，并举例说明了过去和现在的一些实验和试点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Basic Income Pilots: Uses, Limitations and Design Principles

Abstract The position underlying this article is that while pilots are not strictly required to justify moving in the direction of a basic income system, nevertheless they can play several useful functions in the debate. These include rebutting common preconceptions, for instance that basic income will make people ‘lazy’, indicating non-monetary benefits such as improved health and wellbeing, and testing how a basic income might best be introduced in a given region, country or city. In that context the article goes on to present 19 guiding principles for the design, implementation and evaluation of basic income pilots, with examples of selected experiments and pilots past and present.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Basic Income Studies ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

18.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Basic income is a universal income grant available to every citizen without means test or work requirement. Academic discussion of basic income and related policies has been growing in the fields of economics, philosophy, political science, sociology, and public policy over the last few decades — with dozens of journal articles published each year, and basic income constituting the subject of more than 30 books in the last 10 years. In addition, the political discussion of basic income has been expanding through social organizations, NGOs and other advocacy groups. Internationally, recent years have witnessed the endorsement of basic income by grassroots movements as well as government officials in developing countries such as Brazil or South-Africa. As the community of people working on this issue has been expanding all over the world, incorporating grassroots activists, high profile academics — including several Nobel Prize winners in economics — and policymakers, the amount of high quality research on this topic has increased considerably. In the light of such extensive scholarship on this topic, the need to coordinate research efforts through a journal specifically devoted to basic income and cognate policies became pressing. Basic Income Studies (BIS) is the first academic journal to focus specifically on basic income and cognate policies.