用欧拉-拉格朗日和欧拉-欧拉方法模拟二维气泡柱内流动

A. Weber, H. Bart
{"title":"用欧拉-拉格朗日和欧拉-欧拉方法模拟二维气泡柱内流动","authors":"A. Weber, H. Bart","doi":"10.2174/1874123101812010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bubbly flows, as present in bubble column reactors, can be simulated using a variety of simulation techniques. In order to gain high resolution CFD methods are used to simulate a pseudo 2D bubble column using EL and EE techniques. The forces on bubble dynamics are solved within open access software OpenFOAM with bubble interactions computed via Monte Carlo methods. The estimated bubble size distribution and the predicted hold-up are compared to experimental data and other simulative work using EE approach and show reasonable consensus for both. Benchmarks with state of the art EE simulations shows that the EL approach is advantageous if the bubble number stays at a certain level, as the EL approach scales linearly with the number of bubbles simulated. Therefore, different computational meshes have been used to also account for influence of the resolution quality. The EL approach indicated faster solution for all realistic cases, only deliberate decrease of coalescence rates could push CPU time to the limits. Critical bubble number - when EE becomes advantageous over the EL approach - was estimated to be 40.000 in this particular case.","PeriodicalId":22933,"journal":{"name":"The Open Chemical Engineering Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flow Simulation in a 2D Bubble Column with the Euler-lagrange and Euler-euler Method\",\"authors\":\"A. Weber, H. Bart\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874123101812010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bubbly flows, as present in bubble column reactors, can be simulated using a variety of simulation techniques. In order to gain high resolution CFD methods are used to simulate a pseudo 2D bubble column using EL and EE techniques. The forces on bubble dynamics are solved within open access software OpenFOAM with bubble interactions computed via Monte Carlo methods. The estimated bubble size distribution and the predicted hold-up are compared to experimental data and other simulative work using EE approach and show reasonable consensus for both. Benchmarks with state of the art EE simulations shows that the EL approach is advantageous if the bubble number stays at a certain level, as the EL approach scales linearly with the number of bubbles simulated. Therefore, different computational meshes have been used to also account for influence of the resolution quality. The EL approach indicated faster solution for all realistic cases, only deliberate decrease of coalescence rates could push CPU time to the limits. Critical bubble number - when EE becomes advantageous over the EL approach - was estimated to be 40.000 in this particular case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Chemical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Chemical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874123101812010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Chemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874123101812010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

泡塔反应器中的气泡流动可以用多种模拟技术进行模拟。为了获得高分辨率,采用CFD方法,利用EL和EE技术模拟了一个伪二维气泡柱。在开放存取软件OpenFOAM中求解气泡动力学力,并通过蒙特卡罗方法计算气泡相互作用。将估计的气泡大小分布和预测的占空率与实验数据和使用EE方法的其他模拟工作进行了比较,并显示了两者的合理一致性。使用最先进的EE模拟的基准测试表明,如果气泡数量保持在一定水平,EL方法是有利的,因为EL方法随着模拟的气泡数量线性扩展。因此,采用不同的计算网格来考虑分辨率质量的影响。EL方法对所有实际情况都有更快的解决方案,只有故意降低合并率才能将CPU时间推到极限。在这种特殊情况下,临界气泡数——当EE比EL方法更有利时——估计为40000。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flow Simulation in a 2D Bubble Column with the Euler-lagrange and Euler-euler Method
Bubbly flows, as present in bubble column reactors, can be simulated using a variety of simulation techniques. In order to gain high resolution CFD methods are used to simulate a pseudo 2D bubble column using EL and EE techniques. The forces on bubble dynamics are solved within open access software OpenFOAM with bubble interactions computed via Monte Carlo methods. The estimated bubble size distribution and the predicted hold-up are compared to experimental data and other simulative work using EE approach and show reasonable consensus for both. Benchmarks with state of the art EE simulations shows that the EL approach is advantageous if the bubble number stays at a certain level, as the EL approach scales linearly with the number of bubbles simulated. Therefore, different computational meshes have been used to also account for influence of the resolution quality. The EL approach indicated faster solution for all realistic cases, only deliberate decrease of coalescence rates could push CPU time to the limits. Critical bubble number - when EE becomes advantageous over the EL approach - was estimated to be 40.000 in this particular case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信