基于演化度量的搜索测试与动态符号执行相结合

Ziming Zhu, L. Jiao, Xiong Xu
{"title":"基于演化度量的搜索测试与动态符号执行相结合","authors":"Ziming Zhu, L. Jiao, Xiong Xu","doi":"10.1109/ICSME.2018.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the area of software testing, search-based software testing (SBST) and dynamic symbolic execution (DSE) are two efficient testing techniques for test cases generation. However, both of the two approaches have their own drawbacks: The efficiency of SBST depends on the guidance of the fitness landscape. When the fitness landscape has some plateaus with no gradient for directing search process, SBST may degenerate into random testing. DSE relies on the capability of constraint solvers. It may struggle to generate test cases with constraints that are difficult to be solved. In this paper, we combine the strengths of both techniques. SBST is used to help DSE for solving difficult constraints and DSE is used to improve the efficiency and capability of SBST. Evolvability metric is introduced for measuring when the software is not suitable for SBST. A novel switch mechanism based on the evolvability metric between SBST and DSE is proposed in this paper to help to choose the proper technique at the proper time. Experiments on several benchmarks reveal the promising results of our proposal.","PeriodicalId":6572,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","volume":"40 1","pages":"59-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Search-Based Testing and Dynamic Symbolic Execution by Evolvability Metric\",\"authors\":\"Ziming Zhu, L. Jiao, Xiong Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSME.2018.00015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the area of software testing, search-based software testing (SBST) and dynamic symbolic execution (DSE) are two efficient testing techniques for test cases generation. However, both of the two approaches have their own drawbacks: The efficiency of SBST depends on the guidance of the fitness landscape. When the fitness landscape has some plateaus with no gradient for directing search process, SBST may degenerate into random testing. DSE relies on the capability of constraint solvers. It may struggle to generate test cases with constraints that are difficult to be solved. In this paper, we combine the strengths of both techniques. SBST is used to help DSE for solving difficult constraints and DSE is used to improve the efficiency and capability of SBST. Evolvability metric is introduced for measuring when the software is not suitable for SBST. A novel switch mechanism based on the evolvability metric between SBST and DSE is proposed in this paper to help to choose the proper technique at the proper time. Experiments on several benchmarks reveal the promising results of our proposal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"59-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2018.00015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2018.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在软件测试领域,基于搜索的软件测试(SBST)和动态符号执行(DSE)是生成测试用例的两种有效的测试技术。然而,这两种方法都有自己的缺点:SBST的效率取决于健身景观的指导。当适应度景观存在平台且没有梯度用于指导搜索过程时,SBST可能退化为随机检验。DSE依赖于约束求解器的能力。它可能会努力生成带有难以解决的约束的测试用例。在本文中,我们结合了这两种技术的优势。利用SBST帮助DSE解决困难约束,利用DSE提高SBST的效率和能力。引入了可演化性度量,用于在软件不适合SBST时进行度量。本文提出了一种基于演化度度量的SBST和DSE切换机制,以帮助在适当的时间选择适当的技术。在几个基准上的实验显示了我们的建议的有希望的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining Search-Based Testing and Dynamic Symbolic Execution by Evolvability Metric
In the area of software testing, search-based software testing (SBST) and dynamic symbolic execution (DSE) are two efficient testing techniques for test cases generation. However, both of the two approaches have their own drawbacks: The efficiency of SBST depends on the guidance of the fitness landscape. When the fitness landscape has some plateaus with no gradient for directing search process, SBST may degenerate into random testing. DSE relies on the capability of constraint solvers. It may struggle to generate test cases with constraints that are difficult to be solved. In this paper, we combine the strengths of both techniques. SBST is used to help DSE for solving difficult constraints and DSE is used to improve the efficiency and capability of SBST. Evolvability metric is introduced for measuring when the software is not suitable for SBST. A novel switch mechanism based on the evolvability metric between SBST and DSE is proposed in this paper to help to choose the proper technique at the proper time. Experiments on several benchmarks reveal the promising results of our proposal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信