德国实验小鼠毛发脱落发生情况的初步调查

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
P. Kahnau, A. Jaap, U. Hobbiesiefken, P. Mieske, K. Diederich, C. Thöne-Reineke, L. Lewejohann, K. Hohlbaum
{"title":"德国实验小鼠毛发脱落发生情况的初步调查","authors":"P. Kahnau, A. Jaap, U. Hobbiesiefken, P. Mieske, K. Diederich, C. Thöne-Reineke, L. Lewejohann, K. Hohlbaum","doi":"10.7120/09627286.31.4.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although barbering is common in laboratory mice ( Mus musculus), little is known about its effects, both on animal welfare and the research data collected from barbered mice. To gain information on the occurrence of barbering and related risk factors in animal facilities in Germany,\n we performed an online survey. All the respondents (n = 32 animal facilities) had experienced barbering in their facility. In most cases, less than 10% of the mice were affected, and the age of onset was mostly observed to be 2 to < 6 months. A greater susceptibility was reported\n in females and in C57BL/6 mice, but this could not be verified as the prevalence of females and the C57BL/6 strain was unknown. One facility reported differences in barbering between commercial animal suppliers. Barbering was also recorded in mice provided with enrichments, such as houses,\n wood-gnawing blocks, tunnels, running wheels/discs or cage dividers. None of the responding facilities provided swings, structural elements such as an elevated platform or foraging and cognitive enrichment. The questions of whether barbering may have an impact on study results and whether\n victims of barbering can be used for experiments revealed mixed opinions, most likely due to a lack of data on potential effects. This survey clearly demonstrated barbering to be a widely underestimated problem that is not given enough attention. We suggest that the occurrence of barbering\n should be systematically documented in every animal facility and reported in research articles, to provide a greater understanding of barbering and its potential effects.","PeriodicalId":7894,"journal":{"name":"Animal Welfare","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A preliminary survey on the occurrence of barbering in laboratory mice in Germany\",\"authors\":\"P. Kahnau, A. Jaap, U. Hobbiesiefken, P. Mieske, K. Diederich, C. Thöne-Reineke, L. Lewejohann, K. Hohlbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.7120/09627286.31.4.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although barbering is common in laboratory mice ( Mus musculus), little is known about its effects, both on animal welfare and the research data collected from barbered mice. To gain information on the occurrence of barbering and related risk factors in animal facilities in Germany,\\n we performed an online survey. All the respondents (n = 32 animal facilities) had experienced barbering in their facility. In most cases, less than 10% of the mice were affected, and the age of onset was mostly observed to be 2 to < 6 months. A greater susceptibility was reported\\n in females and in C57BL/6 mice, but this could not be verified as the prevalence of females and the C57BL/6 strain was unknown. One facility reported differences in barbering between commercial animal suppliers. Barbering was also recorded in mice provided with enrichments, such as houses,\\n wood-gnawing blocks, tunnels, running wheels/discs or cage dividers. None of the responding facilities provided swings, structural elements such as an elevated platform or foraging and cognitive enrichment. The questions of whether barbering may have an impact on study results and whether\\n victims of barbering can be used for experiments revealed mixed opinions, most likely due to a lack of data on potential effects. This survey clearly demonstrated barbering to be a widely underestimated problem that is not given enough attention. We suggest that the occurrence of barbering\\n should be systematically documented in every animal facility and reported in research articles, to provide a greater understanding of barbering and its potential effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Welfare\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Welfare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.31.4.009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.31.4.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管在实验室小鼠(小家鼠)中理发很常见,但人们对其对动物福利和从理发小鼠收集的研究数据的影响知之甚少。为了获得有关德国动物设施中理发发生率和相关风险因素的信息,我们进行了一项在线调查。所有受访者(n = 32个动物设施)都在其设施内经历过理发。在大多数情况下,不到10%的小鼠受到影响,发病年龄大多在2至< 6个月。据报道,雌性和C57BL/6小鼠的易感性更高,但由于雌性和C57BL/6菌株的患病率未知,因此无法证实这一点。一家机构报告称,商业动物供应商之间的理发方式存在差异。在提供了诸如房屋、咬木块、隧道、跑步轮/圆盘或笼子隔板等丰富物的小鼠中也记录了理发。所有相应的设施都没有提供秋千、高架平台等结构元素或觅食和认知丰富。理发是否会对研究结果产生影响,以及理发的受害者是否可以用于实验,这些问题显示出不同的观点,很可能是由于缺乏潜在影响的数据。这项调查清楚地表明,理发是一个被广泛低估的问题,没有得到足够的重视。我们建议在每个动物设施中系统地记录理发的发生,并在研究文章中报告,以便更好地了解理发及其潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A preliminary survey on the occurrence of barbering in laboratory mice in Germany
Although barbering is common in laboratory mice ( Mus musculus), little is known about its effects, both on animal welfare and the research data collected from barbered mice. To gain information on the occurrence of barbering and related risk factors in animal facilities in Germany, we performed an online survey. All the respondents (n = 32 animal facilities) had experienced barbering in their facility. In most cases, less than 10% of the mice were affected, and the age of onset was mostly observed to be 2 to < 6 months. A greater susceptibility was reported in females and in C57BL/6 mice, but this could not be verified as the prevalence of females and the C57BL/6 strain was unknown. One facility reported differences in barbering between commercial animal suppliers. Barbering was also recorded in mice provided with enrichments, such as houses, wood-gnawing blocks, tunnels, running wheels/discs or cage dividers. None of the responding facilities provided swings, structural elements such as an elevated platform or foraging and cognitive enrichment. The questions of whether barbering may have an impact on study results and whether victims of barbering can be used for experiments revealed mixed opinions, most likely due to a lack of data on potential effects. This survey clearly demonstrated barbering to be a widely underestimated problem that is not given enough attention. We suggest that the occurrence of barbering should be systematically documented in every animal facility and reported in research articles, to provide a greater understanding of barbering and its potential effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Welfare
Animal Welfare 农林科学-动物学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
43
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Welfare is an international scientific and technical journal. It publishes the results of peer-reviewed scientific research, technical studies and reviews relating to the welfare of kept animals (eg on farms, in laboratories, zoos and as companions) and of those in the wild whose welfare is compromised by human activities. Papers on related ethical, social, and legal issues and interdisciplinary papers will also be considered for publication. Studies that are derivative or which replicate existing publications will only be considered if they are adequately justified. Papers will only be considered if they bring new knowledge (for research papers), new perspectives (for reviews) or develop new techniques. Papers must have the potential to improve animal welfare, and the way in which they achieve this, or are likely to do so, must be clearly specified in the section on Animal welfare implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信