对等管理中的弹性路由策略

Stefano Secci, Huaiyuan Ma, B. Helvik, J. Rougier
{"title":"对等管理中的弹性路由策略","authors":"Stefano Secci, Huaiyuan Ma, B. Helvik, J. Rougier","doi":"10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5683622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a novel resilient routing policy for controlling the routing across peering links between Internet carriers. Our policy is aimed at offering more reliability, dependability and better performance to the routing decision with respect to the current practice (e.g., hot-potato routing). Our work relies on a non-cooperative game framework, called Peering Equilibrium MultiPath (PEMP), that has been recently proposed. PEMP allows two carrier providers to coordinate a multipath route selection for critical flows across peering links, while preserving their respective interests and independence. In this paper, we propose a resilient PEMP execution policy accounting for the occurrence of potential impairments (traffic matrix variations, intra-AS and peering link failures) that may occurr in both peering networks. We mathematically define how to produce robust equilibrium sets and describe how to appropriately react to unexpected network impairments that might take place. The results from extensive simulations show that, under a realistic failure scenario, our policy adaptively prevents from peering link congestions and excessive route deviations after failures.","PeriodicalId":6448,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Resilient Routing Policy for Peering Management\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Secci, Huaiyuan Ma, B. Helvik, J. Rougier\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5683622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a novel resilient routing policy for controlling the routing across peering links between Internet carriers. Our policy is aimed at offering more reliability, dependability and better performance to the routing decision with respect to the current practice (e.g., hot-potato routing). Our work relies on a non-cooperative game framework, called Peering Equilibrium MultiPath (PEMP), that has been recently proposed. PEMP allows two carrier providers to coordinate a multipath route selection for critical flows across peering links, while preserving their respective interests and independence. In this paper, we propose a resilient PEMP execution policy accounting for the occurrence of potential impairments (traffic matrix variations, intra-AS and peering link failures) that may occurr in both peering networks. We mathematically define how to produce robust equilibrium sets and describe how to appropriately react to unexpected network impairments that might take place. The results from extensive simulations show that, under a realistic failure scenario, our policy adaptively prevents from peering link congestions and excessive route deviations after failures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5683622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5683622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

提出了一种新的弹性路由策略,用于控制互联网运营商间对等链路的路由。我们的策略旨在为路由决策提供更多的可靠性,可靠性和更好的性能,相对于当前的实践(例如,烫手山芋路由)。我们的工作依赖于最近提出的非合作博弈框架,称为对等均衡多路径(PEMP)。PEMP允许两个运营商提供商协调跨对等链路的关键流的多路径路由选择,同时保持各自的利益和独立性。在本文中,我们提出了一种弹性的PEMP执行策略,考虑到在两个对等网络中可能发生的潜在损害(流量矩阵变化,as内和对等链路故障)的发生。我们从数学上定义了如何产生稳健的平衡集,并描述了如何对可能发生的意外网络损伤做出适当的反应。大量的仿真结果表明,在实际的故障场景下,我们的策略能够自适应地防止对等链路拥塞和故障后的过多路由偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Resilient Routing Policy for Peering Management
We present a novel resilient routing policy for controlling the routing across peering links between Internet carriers. Our policy is aimed at offering more reliability, dependability and better performance to the routing decision with respect to the current practice (e.g., hot-potato routing). Our work relies on a non-cooperative game framework, called Peering Equilibrium MultiPath (PEMP), that has been recently proposed. PEMP allows two carrier providers to coordinate a multipath route selection for critical flows across peering links, while preserving their respective interests and independence. In this paper, we propose a resilient PEMP execution policy accounting for the occurrence of potential impairments (traffic matrix variations, intra-AS and peering link failures) that may occurr in both peering networks. We mathematically define how to produce robust equilibrium sets and describe how to appropriately react to unexpected network impairments that might take place. The results from extensive simulations show that, under a realistic failure scenario, our policy adaptively prevents from peering link congestions and excessive route deviations after failures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信