介绍。城市性质

Q3 Social Sciences
Véronique Fourault-Cauët
{"title":"介绍。城市性质","authors":"Véronique Fourault-Cauët","doi":"10.4000/ARTICULO.3302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This introduction focuses on the main directions explored in this issue. Urban protected areas appear to be more and more frequent spatial configurations that reveal the limits of the traditional nature/culture partition. The different field cases also reveal the lack of urban governance about socio-ecological issues of these urban parks, underlined by their multiple and changing statuses. Although protected areas appear to be a useful tool to affirm their metropolitan rank, many cities fail to manage the conflicts generated by the exclusion processes caused by these parks; reversely, urban parks often make urban social injustice more visible.","PeriodicalId":38124,"journal":{"name":"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction. Urban Natures\",\"authors\":\"Véronique Fourault-Cauët\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/ARTICULO.3302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This introduction focuses on the main directions explored in this issue. Urban protected areas appear to be more and more frequent spatial configurations that reveal the limits of the traditional nature/culture partition. The different field cases also reveal the lack of urban governance about socio-ecological issues of these urban parks, underlined by their multiple and changing statuses. Although protected areas appear to be a useful tool to affirm their metropolitan rank, many cities fail to manage the conflicts generated by the exclusion processes caused by these parks; reversely, urban parks often make urban social injustice more visible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/ARTICULO.3302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/ARTICULO.3302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本导论集中介绍了本课题研究的主要方向。城市保护区呈现出越来越频繁的空间形态,揭示了传统自然/文化分区的局限性。不同的实地案例也揭示了这些城市公园在社会生态问题上缺乏城市治理,其多重和变化的状态突出了这一点。虽然保护区似乎是确认其都市地位的有用工具,但许多城市未能管理由这些公园引起的排斥过程所产生的冲突;相反,城市公园往往使城市社会不公更加明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction. Urban Natures
This introduction focuses on the main directions explored in this issue. Urban protected areas appear to be more and more frequent spatial configurations that reveal the limits of the traditional nature/culture partition. The different field cases also reveal the lack of urban governance about socio-ecological issues of these urban parks, underlined by their multiple and changing statuses. Although protected areas appear to be a useful tool to affirm their metropolitan rank, many cities fail to manage the conflicts generated by the exclusion processes caused by these parks; reversely, urban parks often make urban social injustice more visible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Articulo - Journal of Urban Research
Articulo - Journal of Urban Research Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信