学习的协同,教师和学生支持助理共同促进义务教育后学习者的元认知

C. McPartland
{"title":"学习的协同,教师和学生支持助理共同促进义务教育后学习者的元认知","authors":"C. McPartland","doi":"10.5920/TILL.537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Observations of teaching found Student Support Assistants (SSAs) were frequently ineffectively utilised in supporting learners’ progress, with working partnerships between teachers and SSAs tenuous. This relates to previous research (Sharples et al, 2015a, 2015b; Sanders, 2017a, 2017b) which also indicated that learning support was often ineffectually used in class sessions. Learning support frequently focused on task completion rather than encouraging learner autonomy. Our project promoted effective partnerships between teachers, SSAs and learners through implementing strategies to develop learners’ self-assessment and thinking skills, effectively encouraging and deepening their learning. \n \nA team of 16 teachers and SSAs from different subject areas held initial meetings to establish working relationships and agree stages for the project. The team was introduced to the action research approach, enabling them to become more research literate. This collaborative project used systematic practitioner research to critically examine the current situation and make changes based on the evidence which arose. It brought together practitioners from various levels within the setting, giving each member a space in which to express their opinions, take action and engage with the activities which arose. \n \nInitial background research considered the key findings from the Education Endowment Fund (EEF) Report (Sharples et al, 2015a). These were used to consider and challenge our practice and plan the research. Following extensive discussion, the team developed a Working Practice Guide and designed resources to support student learning. Time was additionally available for staff to plan strategies together prior to their implementation in sessions. These activities, including concept diagrams, learner review tickets and use of thinking prompts, enhanced learners’ self-assessment during lessons with the teachers and SSAs. It provided the opportunity for learners to discuss and resolve areas of difficulty. The effectiveness of the strategies implemented in class were additionally reflected upon by staff and learners. \n \nRegular meetings enabled evaluation of the strategies and future planning. Using the strategies, combined with meeting regularly, promoted teacher, SSA, and learner confidence with SSAs becoming enablers of learning and partners in the learning process.","PeriodicalId":30610,"journal":{"name":"Teaching in Lifelong Learning A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergy in Learning, Teachers and Student Support Assistants Working Together to Promote Learner Metacognition in Post-Compulsory Education\",\"authors\":\"C. McPartland\",\"doi\":\"10.5920/TILL.537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Observations of teaching found Student Support Assistants (SSAs) were frequently ineffectively utilised in supporting learners’ progress, with working partnerships between teachers and SSAs tenuous. This relates to previous research (Sharples et al, 2015a, 2015b; Sanders, 2017a, 2017b) which also indicated that learning support was often ineffectually used in class sessions. Learning support frequently focused on task completion rather than encouraging learner autonomy. Our project promoted effective partnerships between teachers, SSAs and learners through implementing strategies to develop learners’ self-assessment and thinking skills, effectively encouraging and deepening their learning. \\n \\nA team of 16 teachers and SSAs from different subject areas held initial meetings to establish working relationships and agree stages for the project. The team was introduced to the action research approach, enabling them to become more research literate. This collaborative project used systematic practitioner research to critically examine the current situation and make changes based on the evidence which arose. It brought together practitioners from various levels within the setting, giving each member a space in which to express their opinions, take action and engage with the activities which arose. \\n \\nInitial background research considered the key findings from the Education Endowment Fund (EEF) Report (Sharples et al, 2015a). These were used to consider and challenge our practice and plan the research. Following extensive discussion, the team developed a Working Practice Guide and designed resources to support student learning. Time was additionally available for staff to plan strategies together prior to their implementation in sessions. These activities, including concept diagrams, learner review tickets and use of thinking prompts, enhanced learners’ self-assessment during lessons with the teachers and SSAs. It provided the opportunity for learners to discuss and resolve areas of difficulty. The effectiveness of the strategies implemented in class were additionally reflected upon by staff and learners. \\n \\nRegular meetings enabled evaluation of the strategies and future planning. Using the strategies, combined with meeting regularly, promoted teacher, SSA, and learner confidence with SSAs becoming enablers of learning and partners in the learning process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching in Lifelong Learning A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching in Lifelong Learning A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5920/TILL.537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching in Lifelong Learning A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5920/TILL.537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对教学的观察发现,学生支持助理(SSAs)在支持学习者进步方面经常被低效地利用,教师和SSAs之间的工作伙伴关系也很脆弱。这与之前的研究有关(Sharples et al ., 2015a, 2015b;Sanders, 2017a, 2017b),这也表明学习支持在课堂上的使用往往是无效的。学习支持通常侧重于任务的完成,而不是鼓励学习者的自主性。我们的项目通过实施策略来培养学习者的自我评估和思维能力,从而有效地鼓励和深化他们的学习,从而促进教师、学生辅助教师和学习者之间的有效伙伴关系。由来自不同学科领域的16名教师和特殊服务助理组成的团队举行了初步会议,以建立工作关系并商定项目的阶段。该团队被引入了行动研究方法,使他们能够更加了解研究。这个合作项目使用系统的实践者研究来批判性地审视现状,并根据出现的证据做出改变。它将来自不同层次的从业者聚集在一起,为每个成员提供了表达意见、采取行动和参与活动的空间。最初的背景研究考虑了教育捐赠基金(EEF)报告的主要发现(Sharples等,2015)。这些都是用来思考和挑战我们的实践和规划的研究。经过广泛的讨论,该团队开发了一份工作实践指南,并设计了支持学生学习的资源。此外,工作人员还有时间在各届会议执行战略之前共同规划战略。这些活动,包括概念图、学习者复习票和思维提示的使用,提高了学习者在课堂上与教师和学生助理的自我评估。它为学习者提供了讨论和解决困难领域的机会。在课堂上实施的策略的有效性也得到了教师和学习者的反映。定期会议有助于对战略和未来规划进行评价。使用这些策略,结合定期会议,提高了教师、学生助理和学习者的信心,学生助理成为学习的推动者和学习过程中的伙伴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synergy in Learning, Teachers and Student Support Assistants Working Together to Promote Learner Metacognition in Post-Compulsory Education
Observations of teaching found Student Support Assistants (SSAs) were frequently ineffectively utilised in supporting learners’ progress, with working partnerships between teachers and SSAs tenuous. This relates to previous research (Sharples et al, 2015a, 2015b; Sanders, 2017a, 2017b) which also indicated that learning support was often ineffectually used in class sessions. Learning support frequently focused on task completion rather than encouraging learner autonomy. Our project promoted effective partnerships between teachers, SSAs and learners through implementing strategies to develop learners’ self-assessment and thinking skills, effectively encouraging and deepening their learning. A team of 16 teachers and SSAs from different subject areas held initial meetings to establish working relationships and agree stages for the project. The team was introduced to the action research approach, enabling them to become more research literate. This collaborative project used systematic practitioner research to critically examine the current situation and make changes based on the evidence which arose. It brought together practitioners from various levels within the setting, giving each member a space in which to express their opinions, take action and engage with the activities which arose. Initial background research considered the key findings from the Education Endowment Fund (EEF) Report (Sharples et al, 2015a). These were used to consider and challenge our practice and plan the research. Following extensive discussion, the team developed a Working Practice Guide and designed resources to support student learning. Time was additionally available for staff to plan strategies together prior to their implementation in sessions. These activities, including concept diagrams, learner review tickets and use of thinking prompts, enhanced learners’ self-assessment during lessons with the teachers and SSAs. It provided the opportunity for learners to discuss and resolve areas of difficulty. The effectiveness of the strategies implemented in class were additionally reflected upon by staff and learners. Regular meetings enabled evaluation of the strategies and future planning. Using the strategies, combined with meeting regularly, promoted teacher, SSA, and learner confidence with SSAs becoming enablers of learning and partners in the learning process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信