左乙拉西坦作为癫痫持续状态的二线治疗-应使用何种剂量?

J. Rösche, Bernd Schade
{"title":"左乙拉西坦作为癫痫持续状态的二线治疗-应使用何种剂量?","authors":"J. Rösche, Bernd Schade","doi":"10.21307/jepil-2021-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Introduction Since 2004 many treatment episodes in different stages of status epilepticus (SE) have been reported. Nowadays the use of levetiracetam (LEV) is recommended as a second-line treatment of SE, when the use of a benzodiazepine was not successful. Aim The evidence based on randomized controlled trials for the application of a particular weight-based dose of LEV as a second-line treatment in benzodiazepine refractory SE is investigated. Methods Pubmedsearches were undertaken using the terms “Levetiracetam-status-epilepticus-trials” and “Levetiracetam-status-randomized” on May 8th 2021. We identified 17 studies reporting treatment with LEV as second line treatment and reporting dosages in mg/kg body weight. We grouped the studies according to the reported dosages (i.e. 20–25 mg/kg; 30 mg/kg; 40 mg/kg, 60 mg/kg). For each group we calculated the mean efficacy rate and the standard deviation of the efficacy rate weighted for the number of cases in the different studies. Twelve studies compared LEV with 20 mg/kg phenytoin (PHT). In these studies, we analysed the relative efficacy rate in comparison to PHT with the same procedure. Results Seven studies used LEV 20–25 mg/kg, two studies 30 mg/kg, six studies 40 mg/kg and one study 60 mg/kg. Efficacy rate was highest in the group given 30 mg/kg (95% CI 87.5–90.1%). The relative efficacy rate with this weight-based dose was 1.12. This is just above the upper range of the 95% CI of the relative efficacy rate in studies using 40 mg/kg LEV (i.e. 1.11). The relative efficacy rates in the two other groups were considerably lower. Conclusion According to the randomized controlled trials published so far a weight-based dose of 30–40 mg/kg LEV may be appropriate for the treatment of benzodiazepine-refractory SE.","PeriodicalId":15683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epileptology","volume":"1 1","pages":"7 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levetiracetam as second-line treatment of status epilepticus – which dose should be applied?\",\"authors\":\"J. Rösche, Bernd Schade\",\"doi\":\"10.21307/jepil-2021-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY Introduction Since 2004 many treatment episodes in different stages of status epilepticus (SE) have been reported. Nowadays the use of levetiracetam (LEV) is recommended as a second-line treatment of SE, when the use of a benzodiazepine was not successful. Aim The evidence based on randomized controlled trials for the application of a particular weight-based dose of LEV as a second-line treatment in benzodiazepine refractory SE is investigated. Methods Pubmedsearches were undertaken using the terms “Levetiracetam-status-epilepticus-trials” and “Levetiracetam-status-randomized” on May 8th 2021. We identified 17 studies reporting treatment with LEV as second line treatment and reporting dosages in mg/kg body weight. We grouped the studies according to the reported dosages (i.e. 20–25 mg/kg; 30 mg/kg; 40 mg/kg, 60 mg/kg). For each group we calculated the mean efficacy rate and the standard deviation of the efficacy rate weighted for the number of cases in the different studies. Twelve studies compared LEV with 20 mg/kg phenytoin (PHT). In these studies, we analysed the relative efficacy rate in comparison to PHT with the same procedure. Results Seven studies used LEV 20–25 mg/kg, two studies 30 mg/kg, six studies 40 mg/kg and one study 60 mg/kg. Efficacy rate was highest in the group given 30 mg/kg (95% CI 87.5–90.1%). The relative efficacy rate with this weight-based dose was 1.12. This is just above the upper range of the 95% CI of the relative efficacy rate in studies using 40 mg/kg LEV (i.e. 1.11). The relative efficacy rates in the two other groups were considerably lower. Conclusion According to the randomized controlled trials published so far a weight-based dose of 30–40 mg/kg LEV may be appropriate for the treatment of benzodiazepine-refractory SE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Epileptology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"7 - 12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Epileptology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21307/jepil-2021-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epileptology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/jepil-2021-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2004年以来,许多癫痫持续状态(SE)不同阶段的治疗事件被报道。目前,当苯二氮卓类药物使用不成功时,推荐使用左乙拉西坦(LEV)作为SE的二线治疗。目的:通过随机对照试验,探讨一定体重剂量的LEV作为苯二氮卓类药物难治性SE的二线治疗的证据。方法于2021年5月8日在pubmed检索“左乙拉西坦-癫痫状态-试验”和“左乙拉西坦-状态-随机化”。我们确定了17项报告将LEV作为二线治疗的研究,并报告了以mg/kg体重为单位的剂量。我们根据报道的剂量(即20-25 mg/kg;30毫克/公斤;40 mg/kg, 60 mg/kg)。对于每一组,我们计算了不同研究中病例数加权后的平均有效率和有效率的标准差。12项研究比较了LEV与20 mg/kg苯妥英(PHT)。在这些研究中,我们分析了与PHT相比,采用相同程序的相对有效率。结果7项研究使用LEV 20 ~ 25 mg/kg, 2项研究使用LEV 30 mg/kg, 6项研究使用LEV 40 mg/kg, 1项研究使用LEV 60 mg/kg。30 mg/kg组有效率最高(95% CI 87.5-90.1%)。以体重为基础的剂量的相对有效率为1.12。这刚好高于使用40 mg/kg LEV的研究中相对有效率的95% CI上限(即1.11)。其他两组的相对有效率明显较低。结论根据目前发表的随机对照试验,以体重为基础的30-40 mg/kg LEV可能是治疗苯二氮卓类难治性SE的合适剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Levetiracetam as second-line treatment of status epilepticus – which dose should be applied?
SUMMARY Introduction Since 2004 many treatment episodes in different stages of status epilepticus (SE) have been reported. Nowadays the use of levetiracetam (LEV) is recommended as a second-line treatment of SE, when the use of a benzodiazepine was not successful. Aim The evidence based on randomized controlled trials for the application of a particular weight-based dose of LEV as a second-line treatment in benzodiazepine refractory SE is investigated. Methods Pubmedsearches were undertaken using the terms “Levetiracetam-status-epilepticus-trials” and “Levetiracetam-status-randomized” on May 8th 2021. We identified 17 studies reporting treatment with LEV as second line treatment and reporting dosages in mg/kg body weight. We grouped the studies according to the reported dosages (i.e. 20–25 mg/kg; 30 mg/kg; 40 mg/kg, 60 mg/kg). For each group we calculated the mean efficacy rate and the standard deviation of the efficacy rate weighted for the number of cases in the different studies. Twelve studies compared LEV with 20 mg/kg phenytoin (PHT). In these studies, we analysed the relative efficacy rate in comparison to PHT with the same procedure. Results Seven studies used LEV 20–25 mg/kg, two studies 30 mg/kg, six studies 40 mg/kg and one study 60 mg/kg. Efficacy rate was highest in the group given 30 mg/kg (95% CI 87.5–90.1%). The relative efficacy rate with this weight-based dose was 1.12. This is just above the upper range of the 95% CI of the relative efficacy rate in studies using 40 mg/kg LEV (i.e. 1.11). The relative efficacy rates in the two other groups were considerably lower. Conclusion According to the randomized controlled trials published so far a weight-based dose of 30–40 mg/kg LEV may be appropriate for the treatment of benzodiazepine-refractory SE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信