{"title":"基于ECCRARO模型的尼日利亚西南部Eyong河流域暴雨水动力学控制过程分析","authors":"O. Essien, A. Sangodoyin","doi":"10.4314/JASET.V6I1.38308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ECCRARO model, which registers flood-stage response to rainfall impulse in Enyong/Ikpa rivers' catchments, was applied in conjunction with the analysis of the physical properties of the catchment system to establish how surface runoff/subsurface drainage to the floodplains/rivers and the flood routing through the catchment rivers control flood stages, hence flooding of the catchments. The control of the rising and falling flood stages under rainfall impulse was dominated by the combined processes of runoff production/drainage and flood routing. However, drainage through the floodplain was slower in Enyong Creek catchment than the routing of floodwater through its river system, hence, drainage problem was a priority in upstream Enyong Creek. In Ikpa river\ncatchment, the sluggish flood routing in its river system dominated flooding problem more than the runoff production process, making flood routing a priority problem. The runoff coefficients, generating surface runoff from excess effective rainfall into runoff were twice higher in Enyong Creek than in Ikpa river catchments, while the groundwater\nflows in Ikpa sub-catchments exceeded those from corresponding sub-catchments in Enyong basin. On the other hand, the Lag between stage accretion and recession rates was wider in Ikpa than Enyong rivers, while the time of concentration of 3.5 to 4.5 hours in Enyong was far greater than the Lag time of 0.5 hour in Ikpa catchments. The\nlower surface gradient in Ikpa river at its confluence with Cross river retarded its entrance flow rates, causing a higher upstream backwater that exacerbates flooding in Ikpa tributary swamps, while the entrance in the Enyong Creek was smoother at its confluence due to its positive surface gradient at its confluence with Cross river. Drainage of runoff is priority flood control problem in Enyong Creek catchment while flood routing is priority in Ikpa\nriver catchment. Keywords : Control processes, storm water dynamics, drainage, flood routing, ECCRARO Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 6 (1) 2006 pp. 39-47","PeriodicalId":7884,"journal":{"name":"Andalasian International Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology","volume":"27 1","pages":"39-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Control Processes Upon Storm Water Dynamics Using ECCRARO Model in Eyong Creek and River Catchments in South-Western Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"O. Essien, A. Sangodoyin\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/JASET.V6I1.38308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ECCRARO model, which registers flood-stage response to rainfall impulse in Enyong/Ikpa rivers' catchments, was applied in conjunction with the analysis of the physical properties of the catchment system to establish how surface runoff/subsurface drainage to the floodplains/rivers and the flood routing through the catchment rivers control flood stages, hence flooding of the catchments. The control of the rising and falling flood stages under rainfall impulse was dominated by the combined processes of runoff production/drainage and flood routing. However, drainage through the floodplain was slower in Enyong Creek catchment than the routing of floodwater through its river system, hence, drainage problem was a priority in upstream Enyong Creek. In Ikpa river\\ncatchment, the sluggish flood routing in its river system dominated flooding problem more than the runoff production process, making flood routing a priority problem. The runoff coefficients, generating surface runoff from excess effective rainfall into runoff were twice higher in Enyong Creek than in Ikpa river catchments, while the groundwater\\nflows in Ikpa sub-catchments exceeded those from corresponding sub-catchments in Enyong basin. On the other hand, the Lag between stage accretion and recession rates was wider in Ikpa than Enyong rivers, while the time of concentration of 3.5 to 4.5 hours in Enyong was far greater than the Lag time of 0.5 hour in Ikpa catchments. The\\nlower surface gradient in Ikpa river at its confluence with Cross river retarded its entrance flow rates, causing a higher upstream backwater that exacerbates flooding in Ikpa tributary swamps, while the entrance in the Enyong Creek was smoother at its confluence due to its positive surface gradient at its confluence with Cross river. Drainage of runoff is priority flood control problem in Enyong Creek catchment while flood routing is priority in Ikpa\\nriver catchment. Keywords : Control processes, storm water dynamics, drainage, flood routing, ECCRARO Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 6 (1) 2006 pp. 39-47\",\"PeriodicalId\":7884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Andalasian International Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"39-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Andalasian International Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/JASET.V6I1.38308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andalasian International Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JASET.V6I1.38308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
ECCRARO模型记录了恩永河/伊克帕河集水区对降雨脉冲的洪水级响应,该模型与集水区系统的物理特性分析结合使用,以确定地表径流/地下排水到洪泛区/河流以及通过集水区河流的洪水路径如何控制洪水级,从而导致集水区的洪水泛滥。降雨冲量下洪水涨落阶段的控制主要是产/排径流和洪水路径的联合过程。然而,恩永溪流域通过洪泛区的排水速度比洪水通过其河流系统的速度要慢,因此,恩永溪上游的排水问题是一个优先考虑的问题。在Ikpa河流域,其水系中缓慢的洪水调度对洪水问题的影响大于产流过程,使洪水调度成为优先问题。恩永溪将过量有效降雨转化为径流的径流系数是伊帕河流域的2倍,而伊帕河流域的地下水流量超过了恩永流域相应的子流域。另一方面,伊克帕河的阶段增长速率与衰退速率之间的滞后比恩永河更大,而恩永河的3.5 ~ 4.5 h的集中时间远远大于伊克帕河流域的0.5 h的滞后时间。伊克帕河与克罗斯河汇合处较低的地表梯度降低了伊克帕河的入口流量,导致上游回水增加,加剧了伊克帕河支流沼泽的洪水泛滥,而恩永溪汇合处的入口由于与克罗斯河汇合处的正地表梯度而较平缓。径流排水是恩永河流域的首要防洪问题,而调洪则是伊克帕里河流域的首要防洪问题。关键词:控制过程,暴雨水动力学,排水,洪水路径,ECCRARO应用科学,工程技术Vol. 6 (1) 2006 pp. 39-47
Analysis of the Control Processes Upon Storm Water Dynamics Using ECCRARO Model in Eyong Creek and River Catchments in South-Western Nigeria
ECCRARO model, which registers flood-stage response to rainfall impulse in Enyong/Ikpa rivers' catchments, was applied in conjunction with the analysis of the physical properties of the catchment system to establish how surface runoff/subsurface drainage to the floodplains/rivers and the flood routing through the catchment rivers control flood stages, hence flooding of the catchments. The control of the rising and falling flood stages under rainfall impulse was dominated by the combined processes of runoff production/drainage and flood routing. However, drainage through the floodplain was slower in Enyong Creek catchment than the routing of floodwater through its river system, hence, drainage problem was a priority in upstream Enyong Creek. In Ikpa river
catchment, the sluggish flood routing in its river system dominated flooding problem more than the runoff production process, making flood routing a priority problem. The runoff coefficients, generating surface runoff from excess effective rainfall into runoff were twice higher in Enyong Creek than in Ikpa river catchments, while the groundwater
flows in Ikpa sub-catchments exceeded those from corresponding sub-catchments in Enyong basin. On the other hand, the Lag between stage accretion and recession rates was wider in Ikpa than Enyong rivers, while the time of concentration of 3.5 to 4.5 hours in Enyong was far greater than the Lag time of 0.5 hour in Ikpa catchments. The
lower surface gradient in Ikpa river at its confluence with Cross river retarded its entrance flow rates, causing a higher upstream backwater that exacerbates flooding in Ikpa tributary swamps, while the entrance in the Enyong Creek was smoother at its confluence due to its positive surface gradient at its confluence with Cross river. Drainage of runoff is priority flood control problem in Enyong Creek catchment while flood routing is priority in Ikpa
river catchment. Keywords : Control processes, storm water dynamics, drainage, flood routing, ECCRARO Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 6 (1) 2006 pp. 39-47