“那个习俗的足迹……仍然存在”:中世纪记忆文化和托马斯·奥沙利文对爱尔兰吟游诗人传统的描绘

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"“那个习俗的足迹……仍然存在”:中世纪记忆文化和托马斯·奥沙利文对爱尔兰吟游诗人传统的描绘","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/ria.0.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The preface to the Memoirs…of the Marquis of Clanricarde (1722) is a curious text. Written by Thomas O’Sullevane, ostensibly in response to the 1720 printing of the ‘Short view of the state and condition of the kingdom of Ireland’ by Edward Hyde, earl of Clarendon, the preface challenged ‘Protestant’ narratives of Catholic butchery in the 1640s. For the most part, O’Sullevane’s claims were supported by a sustained consideration of historical evidence, an uncommon feature in the contemporary discourse. His insights have had little impact, however, on how historians interpret the 1640s. Yet, Celtic scholars frequently invoke O’Sullevane’s preface to describe the schooling of Irish bardic poets—without reference to its broader purpose. The aim of this article is to historicise O’Sullevane’s work and to show how contemporary philological and antiquarian-minded investigations shaped O’Sullevane’s portrayal of the Irish past, especially the Irish bardic world.","PeriodicalId":43075,"journal":{"name":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL IRISH ACADEMY SECTION C-ARCHAEOLOGY CELTIC STUDIES HISTORY LINGUISTICS LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘The footsteps of that custom…still remaining’: Medieval memory culture and Thomas O’Sullevane’s portrayal of the Irish bardic tradition\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ria.0.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The preface to the Memoirs…of the Marquis of Clanricarde (1722) is a curious text. Written by Thomas O’Sullevane, ostensibly in response to the 1720 printing of the ‘Short view of the state and condition of the kingdom of Ireland’ by Edward Hyde, earl of Clarendon, the preface challenged ‘Protestant’ narratives of Catholic butchery in the 1640s. For the most part, O’Sullevane’s claims were supported by a sustained consideration of historical evidence, an uncommon feature in the contemporary discourse. His insights have had little impact, however, on how historians interpret the 1640s. Yet, Celtic scholars frequently invoke O’Sullevane’s preface to describe the schooling of Irish bardic poets—without reference to its broader purpose. The aim of this article is to historicise O’Sullevane’s work and to show how contemporary philological and antiquarian-minded investigations shaped O’Sullevane’s portrayal of the Irish past, especially the Irish bardic world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL IRISH ACADEMY SECTION C-ARCHAEOLOGY CELTIC STUDIES HISTORY LINGUISTICS LITERATURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL IRISH ACADEMY SECTION C-ARCHAEOLOGY CELTIC STUDIES HISTORY LINGUISTICS LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ria.0.0001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL IRISH ACADEMY SECTION C-ARCHAEOLOGY CELTIC STUDIES HISTORY LINGUISTICS LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ria.0.0001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《克莱里卡德侯爵回忆录》(1722)的序言是一篇奇怪的文章。由Thomas O ' sullevane撰写,表面上是对1720年出版的爱德华·海德(Edward Hyde)的《爱尔兰王国的状态和状况》的回应,克拉伦登伯爵,序言挑战了“新教”对1640年代天主教屠杀的叙述。在很大程度上,O 'Sullevane的主张得到了对历史证据的持续考虑的支持,这在当代话语中是不常见的特征。然而,他的见解对历史学家如何解读17世纪40年代几乎没有影响。然而,凯尔特学者经常引用O 'Sullevane的序言来描述爱尔兰吟游诗人的学校教育,而没有提及其更广泛的目的。本文的目的是将O 'Sullevane的作品历史化,并展示当代文献学和古物研究是如何塑造O 'Sullevane对爱尔兰过去,特别是爱尔兰诗歌世界的描绘的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘The footsteps of that custom…still remaining’: Medieval memory culture and Thomas O’Sullevane’s portrayal of the Irish bardic tradition
The preface to the Memoirs…of the Marquis of Clanricarde (1722) is a curious text. Written by Thomas O’Sullevane, ostensibly in response to the 1720 printing of the ‘Short view of the state and condition of the kingdom of Ireland’ by Edward Hyde, earl of Clarendon, the preface challenged ‘Protestant’ narratives of Catholic butchery in the 1640s. For the most part, O’Sullevane’s claims were supported by a sustained consideration of historical evidence, an uncommon feature in the contemporary discourse. His insights have had little impact, however, on how historians interpret the 1640s. Yet, Celtic scholars frequently invoke O’Sullevane’s preface to describe the schooling of Irish bardic poets—without reference to its broader purpose. The aim of this article is to historicise O’Sullevane’s work and to show how contemporary philological and antiquarian-minded investigations shaped O’Sullevane’s portrayal of the Irish past, especially the Irish bardic world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信