计算机科学入门教育

A. Nico Habermann
{"title":"计算机科学入门教育","authors":"A. Nico Habermann","doi":"10.1016/S0167-9287(05)80083-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is room for improvement in the way introductory computer science is taught. In general, most of the available time is spent on teaching programming language syntax and very little on studying examples of good programs. The assertion approach to program verification has in practice resulted in a technique that resembles assembly code programming of more than 30 years ago. This practice has also encouraged the view that each new program is an invention that must be developed from scratch. In addition, the student's attention is largely directed towards the <em>how</em> of the technique and hardly towards learning the proven facts. In this paper, it is argued that the introduction to programming can be improved in several ways: by starting with a systems view that encourages students to study good examples and to reuse existing programs, by judging program quality relative to similar programs and program abstractions, and by building up a coherent body of knowledge that students can apply in program design and implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100393,"journal":{"name":"Education and Computing","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 73-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0167-9287(05)80083-4","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introductory education in computer science\",\"authors\":\"A. Nico Habermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0167-9287(05)80083-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is room for improvement in the way introductory computer science is taught. In general, most of the available time is spent on teaching programming language syntax and very little on studying examples of good programs. The assertion approach to program verification has in practice resulted in a technique that resembles assembly code programming of more than 30 years ago. This practice has also encouraged the view that each new program is an invention that must be developed from scratch. In addition, the student's attention is largely directed towards the <em>how</em> of the technique and hardly towards learning the proven facts. In this paper, it is argued that the introduction to programming can be improved in several ways: by starting with a systems view that encourages students to study good examples and to reuse existing programs, by judging program quality relative to similar programs and program abstractions, and by building up a coherent body of knowledge that students can apply in program design and implementation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Computing\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 73-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0167-9287(05)80083-4\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167928705800834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167928705800834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

计算机科学入门的教学方式还有改进的余地。一般来说,大部分可用的时间都花在教授编程语言语法上,而很少花在研究好的程序示例上。程序验证的断言方法在实践中产生了一种类似于30多年前的汇编代码编程的技术。这种做法也鼓励了这样一种观点,即每个新程序都是必须从头开始开发的发明。此外,学生的注意力主要集中在如何使用技术上,而不是学习已证实的事实。在本文中,作者认为程序设计的介绍可以通过几种方式改进:从鼓励学生学习好的例子和重用现有程序的系统观点开始,通过与类似程序和程序抽象相比较来判断程序质量,并通过建立一个学生可以在程序设计和实现中应用的连贯的知识体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introductory education in computer science

There is room for improvement in the way introductory computer science is taught. In general, most of the available time is spent on teaching programming language syntax and very little on studying examples of good programs. The assertion approach to program verification has in practice resulted in a technique that resembles assembly code programming of more than 30 years ago. This practice has also encouraged the view that each new program is an invention that must be developed from scratch. In addition, the student's attention is largely directed towards the how of the technique and hardly towards learning the proven facts. In this paper, it is argued that the introduction to programming can be improved in several ways: by starting with a systems view that encourages students to study good examples and to reuse existing programs, by judging program quality relative to similar programs and program abstractions, and by building up a coherent body of knowledge that students can apply in program design and implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信