善,恶,丑:道德能动性和受害者在赔偿项目中的角色

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
C. Waterhouse
{"title":"善,恶,丑:道德能动性和受害者在赔偿项目中的角色","authors":"C. Waterhouse","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1018565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the growing interest in reparations, at the domestic and international level, little attention has been given to the role of victims in the design and implementation of reparations programs. Instead, most programs and commentators place emphasis upon the apology, recompense, or restitution required by former wrongdoers rather than the restoration and recovery of victims. This prevailing approach neglects the critical role that communities and individuals suffering from past abuses should play in order to reestablish their personal well being and societal standing. This methodology replicates the past subordination of victims by rendering them the passive recipients of government actions that they have little or no control over. Over the past fifty years, reparations programs have varied in their overall quality and in their attention to this issue. This article examines some of the most well known domestic and international reparations programs and evaluates them based on how well they facilitate victims' participation in their own recovery. The analysis concludes that programs that enable victims to play a part in critical societal institutions offer a more thorough remedy to past harms by fostering victims' moral agency.","PeriodicalId":43790,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law","volume":"7 1","pages":"257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Moral Agency and the Role of Victims in Reparations Programs\",\"authors\":\"C. Waterhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1018565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the growing interest in reparations, at the domestic and international level, little attention has been given to the role of victims in the design and implementation of reparations programs. Instead, most programs and commentators place emphasis upon the apology, recompense, or restitution required by former wrongdoers rather than the restoration and recovery of victims. This prevailing approach neglects the critical role that communities and individuals suffering from past abuses should play in order to reestablish their personal well being and societal standing. This methodology replicates the past subordination of victims by rendering them the passive recipients of government actions that they have little or no control over. Over the past fifty years, reparations programs have varied in their overall quality and in their attention to this issue. This article examines some of the most well known domestic and international reparations programs and evaluates them based on how well they facilitate victims' participation in their own recovery. The analysis concludes that programs that enable victims to play a part in critical societal institutions offer a more thorough remedy to past harms by fostering victims' moral agency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1018565\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1018565","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

尽管对赔偿的兴趣日益浓厚,但在国内和国际层面,很少有人注意到受害者在设计和实施赔偿方案中的作用。相反,大多数节目和评论员强调的是昔日犯罪者所要求的道歉、赔偿或赔偿,而不是受害者的恢复和恢复。这种普遍的做法忽视了遭受过去虐待的社区和个人为重建其个人福祉和社会地位应发挥的关键作用。这种方法复制了过去受害者的从属地位,使他们成为政府行动的被动接受者,他们很少或根本无法控制。在过去的五十年中,赔偿方案的整体质量和对这一问题的关注程度各不相同。本文考察了一些最著名的国内和国际赔偿项目,并根据它们如何促进受害者参与自己的康复来对它们进行评估。分析得出的结论是,通过培养受害者的道德能动性,使受害者能够在关键的社会机构中发挥作用的项目,为过去的伤害提供了更彻底的补救措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Moral Agency and the Role of Victims in Reparations Programs
Despite the growing interest in reparations, at the domestic and international level, little attention has been given to the role of victims in the design and implementation of reparations programs. Instead, most programs and commentators place emphasis upon the apology, recompense, or restitution required by former wrongdoers rather than the restoration and recovery of victims. This prevailing approach neglects the critical role that communities and individuals suffering from past abuses should play in order to reestablish their personal well being and societal standing. This methodology replicates the past subordination of victims by rendering them the passive recipients of government actions that they have little or no control over. Over the past fifty years, reparations programs have varied in their overall quality and in their attention to this issue. This article examines some of the most well known domestic and international reparations programs and evaluates them based on how well they facilitate victims' participation in their own recovery. The analysis concludes that programs that enable victims to play a part in critical societal institutions offer a more thorough remedy to past harms by fostering victims' moral agency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信