{"title":"自闭症谱系障碍患者限制性、重复性行为与焦虑的关系:一项meta分析","authors":"S. Jefferson, Lauren S. Erp","doi":"10.1080/07317107.2022.2111750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRBs) are increasingly being reported to limit the social adaptability of children with autism. Method Three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, & Web of Science) were selected to conduct a systematic review to examine the consistency in which theoretical frameworks and instruments have been used to evaluate the presence and impact of RRBs in young children who may have ASD. Results Among the 36 articles examined in this review, young males represented 78.5% of the totality of participants (n = 62,339). Approximately one-third of the studies (n = 11) provided an explanation of RRBs through utilizing a theoretical framework. With respect to instrument utility, of the 35 instruments recorded, the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) was most frequently used. Conclusions The ADOS and the Autism Diagnostic Interview – Revised (ADI-R) are highly revered as they both are consistently referenced as “a gold standard.” However, due to the expensiveness of those assessments, they are underutilized, likely among vulnerable populations (e.g., economically disadvantaged, ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+), as many practitioners and parents cannot afford access to them.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relation between Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors and Anxiety in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"S. Jefferson, Lauren S. Erp\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07317107.2022.2111750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRBs) are increasingly being reported to limit the social adaptability of children with autism. Method Three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, & Web of Science) were selected to conduct a systematic review to examine the consistency in which theoretical frameworks and instruments have been used to evaluate the presence and impact of RRBs in young children who may have ASD. Results Among the 36 articles examined in this review, young males represented 78.5% of the totality of participants (n = 62,339). Approximately one-third of the studies (n = 11) provided an explanation of RRBs through utilizing a theoretical framework. With respect to instrument utility, of the 35 instruments recorded, the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) was most frequently used. Conclusions The ADOS and the Autism Diagnostic Interview – Revised (ADI-R) are highly revered as they both are consistently referenced as “a gold standard.” However, due to the expensiveness of those assessments, they are underutilized, likely among vulnerable populations (e.g., economically disadvantaged, ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+), as many practitioners and parents cannot afford access to them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317107.2022.2111750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317107.2022.2111750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景限制和重复行为(RRBs)是限制自闭症儿童社会适应能力的重要因素。方法选择三个数据库(PubMed、PsycINFO和Web of Science)进行系统综述,以检查用于评估可能患有ASD的幼儿中RRBs的存在及其影响的理论框架和工具的一致性。在本综述的36篇文章中,年轻男性占参与者总数的78.5% (n = 62,339)。大约三分之一的研究(n = 11)通过利用理论框架提供了RRBs的解释。就仪器的效用而言,在记录的35种仪器中,自闭症诊断观察表(ADOS)是最常用的。ADOS和自闭症诊断访谈-修订版(ADI-R)都备受推崇,因为它们都一直被称为“黄金标准”。然而,由于这些评估的费用昂贵,它们没有得到充分利用,很可能在弱势群体中(例如,经济弱势群体、少数民族、LGBTQ+),因为许多从业者和家长无法负担得起这些评估。
Relation between Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors and Anxiety in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract Background Restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRBs) are increasingly being reported to limit the social adaptability of children with autism. Method Three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, & Web of Science) were selected to conduct a systematic review to examine the consistency in which theoretical frameworks and instruments have been used to evaluate the presence and impact of RRBs in young children who may have ASD. Results Among the 36 articles examined in this review, young males represented 78.5% of the totality of participants (n = 62,339). Approximately one-third of the studies (n = 11) provided an explanation of RRBs through utilizing a theoretical framework. With respect to instrument utility, of the 35 instruments recorded, the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) was most frequently used. Conclusions The ADOS and the Autism Diagnostic Interview – Revised (ADI-R) are highly revered as they both are consistently referenced as “a gold standard.” However, due to the expensiveness of those assessments, they are underutilized, likely among vulnerable populations (e.g., economically disadvantaged, ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+), as many practitioners and parents cannot afford access to them.