咖啡酸刺激F344雄性大鼠前胃和肾脏细胞分裂的剂量效应。

U. Lutz, S. Lugli, A. Bitsch, J. Schlatter, W. Lutz
{"title":"咖啡酸刺激F344雄性大鼠前胃和肾脏细胞分裂的剂量效应。","authors":"U. Lutz, S. Lugli, A. Bitsch, J. Schlatter, W. Lutz","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/39.2.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caffeic acid (CA, 3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid), at 2% in the diet, had been shown to be carcinogenic in forestomach and kidney of F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Based on its occurrence in coffee and numerous foods and using a linear interpolation for cancer incidence between dose 0 and 2%, the cancer risk in humans would be considerable. In both target organs, tumor formation was preceded by hyperplasia, which could represent the main mechanism of carcinogenic action. The dose-response relationship for this effect was investigated in male F344 rats after 4-week feeding with CA at different dietary concentrations (0, 0.05, 0.14, 0.40, and 1.64%). Cells in S-phase of DNA replication were visualized by immunohistochemical analysis of incorporated 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU), 2 hr after intraperitoneal injection. In the forestomach, both the total number of epithelial cells per millimeter section length and the unit length labeling index of BrdU-positive cells (ULLI) were increased, about 2.5-fold, at 0.40 and 1.64%. The lowest concentration (0.05%) had no effect. At 0.14%, both variables were decreased by about one-third. In the kidney, the labeling index in proximal tubular cells also indicated a J-shaped (or U-shaped) dose response with a 1. 8-fold increase at 1.64%. In the glandular stomach and in the liver, which are not target organs, no dose-related effect was seen. The data show a good correlation between the organ specificity for cancer induction and stimulation of cell division. With respect to the dose-response relationship and the corresponding extrapolation of the animal tumor data to a human cancer risk, a linear extrapolation appears not to be appropriate.","PeriodicalId":12658,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology","volume":"1 1","pages":"131-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose response for the stimulation of cell division by caffeic acid in forestomach and kidney of the male F344 rat.\",\"authors\":\"U. Lutz, S. Lugli, A. Bitsch, J. Schlatter, W. Lutz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/toxsci/39.2.131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Caffeic acid (CA, 3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid), at 2% in the diet, had been shown to be carcinogenic in forestomach and kidney of F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Based on its occurrence in coffee and numerous foods and using a linear interpolation for cancer incidence between dose 0 and 2%, the cancer risk in humans would be considerable. In both target organs, tumor formation was preceded by hyperplasia, which could represent the main mechanism of carcinogenic action. The dose-response relationship for this effect was investigated in male F344 rats after 4-week feeding with CA at different dietary concentrations (0, 0.05, 0.14, 0.40, and 1.64%). Cells in S-phase of DNA replication were visualized by immunohistochemical analysis of incorporated 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU), 2 hr after intraperitoneal injection. In the forestomach, both the total number of epithelial cells per millimeter section length and the unit length labeling index of BrdU-positive cells (ULLI) were increased, about 2.5-fold, at 0.40 and 1.64%. The lowest concentration (0.05%) had no effect. At 0.14%, both variables were decreased by about one-third. In the kidney, the labeling index in proximal tubular cells also indicated a J-shaped (or U-shaped) dose response with a 1. 8-fold increase at 1.64%. In the glandular stomach and in the liver, which are not target organs, no dose-related effect was seen. The data show a good correlation between the organ specificity for cancer induction and stimulation of cell division. With respect to the dose-response relationship and the corresponding extrapolation of the animal tumor data to a human cancer risk, a linear extrapolation appears not to be appropriate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"131-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/39.2.131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/39.2.131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

饮食中2%的咖啡酸(CA, 3,4-二羟基肉桂酸)已被证明对F344大鼠和B6C3F1小鼠的前胃和肾脏具有致癌作用。根据它在咖啡和许多食物中的含量,以及对剂量0到2%之间的癌症发病率进行线性插值,人类的癌症风险将是相当大的。在两种靶器官中,肿瘤形成之前都有增生,这可能是致癌作用的主要机制。在饲喂饲粮不同浓度CA(0、0.05、0.14、0.40和1.64%)4周后,对雄性F344大鼠进行了剂量-反应关系研究。腹腔注射5-溴-2′-脱氧尿苷(BrdU) 2小时后,通过免疫组化分析观察DNA复制s期的细胞。前胃每毫米切片长度上皮细胞总数和brdu阳性细胞单位长度标记指数(ULLI)均增加约2.5倍,分别为0.40和1.64%。最低浓度(0.05%)无影响。在0.14%时,两个变量都减少了约三分之一。在肾脏中,近端小管细胞的标记指数也显示为j型(或u型)剂量反应,为1。增长了8倍,达到1.64%。在非靶器官的腺胃和肝中,未见剂量相关效应。数据显示,器官特异性的癌症诱导和细胞分裂的刺激之间有良好的相关性。关于剂量-反应关系和动物肿瘤数据对人类癌症风险的相应外推,线性外推似乎不合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dose response for the stimulation of cell division by caffeic acid in forestomach and kidney of the male F344 rat.
Caffeic acid (CA, 3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid), at 2% in the diet, had been shown to be carcinogenic in forestomach and kidney of F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Based on its occurrence in coffee and numerous foods and using a linear interpolation for cancer incidence between dose 0 and 2%, the cancer risk in humans would be considerable. In both target organs, tumor formation was preceded by hyperplasia, which could represent the main mechanism of carcinogenic action. The dose-response relationship for this effect was investigated in male F344 rats after 4-week feeding with CA at different dietary concentrations (0, 0.05, 0.14, 0.40, and 1.64%). Cells in S-phase of DNA replication were visualized by immunohistochemical analysis of incorporated 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU), 2 hr after intraperitoneal injection. In the forestomach, both the total number of epithelial cells per millimeter section length and the unit length labeling index of BrdU-positive cells (ULLI) were increased, about 2.5-fold, at 0.40 and 1.64%. The lowest concentration (0.05%) had no effect. At 0.14%, both variables were decreased by about one-third. In the kidney, the labeling index in proximal tubular cells also indicated a J-shaped (or U-shaped) dose response with a 1. 8-fold increase at 1.64%. In the glandular stomach and in the liver, which are not target organs, no dose-related effect was seen. The data show a good correlation between the organ specificity for cancer induction and stimulation of cell division. With respect to the dose-response relationship and the corresponding extrapolation of the animal tumor data to a human cancer risk, a linear extrapolation appears not to be appropriate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信