合理化动物的多种用途:在肉类之外的4N理由的应用

Jared Piazza, L. Cooper, Shannon Slater-Johnson
{"title":"合理化动物的多种用途:在肉类之外的4N理由的应用","authors":"Jared Piazza, L. Cooper, Shannon Slater-Johnson","doi":"10.1079/hai.2020.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Past research has uncovered four common justifications for using animals as food — the 4Ns — that eating meat is\n Natural, Normal, Necessary,\n and\n Nice.\n The current research investigated the extent to which the 4Ns might apply more generally to other animal uses. Two studies examined the moral justifications people spontaneously offered for various animal uses, including household products, clothing, culling, and horse racing (Study1), and in zoos, TV/film, as pets, and for medical testing (Study 2). Participants offered reasons for why it is okay to use animals and the responses were coded by independent raters. The 4N categories accounted for the majority of justifications across most uses. There was great variability in justification categories offered for each use, and some uses generated justification categories not covered within the 4N scheme, including humane treatment, prioritization of human lives, and sustainability arguments. This research provides a large-scope investigation of animal use justifications that moves beyond meat consumption.\n","PeriodicalId":90845,"journal":{"name":"Human-animal interaction bulletin","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rationalizing the Many Uses of Animals: Application of the 4N Justifications Beyond Meat\",\"authors\":\"Jared Piazza, L. Cooper, Shannon Slater-Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1079/hai.2020.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Past research has uncovered four common justifications for using animals as food — the 4Ns — that eating meat is\\n Natural, Normal, Necessary,\\n and\\n Nice.\\n The current research investigated the extent to which the 4Ns might apply more generally to other animal uses. Two studies examined the moral justifications people spontaneously offered for various animal uses, including household products, clothing, culling, and horse racing (Study1), and in zoos, TV/film, as pets, and for medical testing (Study 2). Participants offered reasons for why it is okay to use animals and the responses were coded by independent raters. The 4N categories accounted for the majority of justifications across most uses. There was great variability in justification categories offered for each use, and some uses generated justification categories not covered within the 4N scheme, including humane treatment, prioritization of human lives, and sustainability arguments. This research provides a large-scope investigation of animal use justifications that moves beyond meat consumption.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":90845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human-animal interaction bulletin\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human-animal interaction bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2020.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human-animal interaction bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2020.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

过去的研究揭示了使用动物作为食物的四个常见理由——4n——吃肉是自然的、正常的、必要的和好的。目前的研究调查了4Ns在多大程度上可能更广泛地应用于其他动物用途。两项研究调查了人们自发地为各种动物用途提供的道德理由,包括家用产品、服装、扑杀和赛马(研究1),以及动物园、电视/电影、宠物和医学测试(研究2)。参与者提供了为什么可以使用动物的理由,这些回答由独立评分者编码。在大多数使用中,这4N个类别占了大多数理由。为每种用途提供的理由类别存在很大差异,有些用途产生的理由类别未包括在4N方案中,包括人道待遇、人类生命的优先次序和可持续性论点。这项研究提供了一个大范围的调查动物使用的理由,超越了肉类消费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rationalizing the Many Uses of Animals: Application of the 4N Justifications Beyond Meat
Past research has uncovered four common justifications for using animals as food — the 4Ns — that eating meat is Natural, Normal, Necessary, and Nice. The current research investigated the extent to which the 4Ns might apply more generally to other animal uses. Two studies examined the moral justifications people spontaneously offered for various animal uses, including household products, clothing, culling, and horse racing (Study1), and in zoos, TV/film, as pets, and for medical testing (Study 2). Participants offered reasons for why it is okay to use animals and the responses were coded by independent raters. The 4N categories accounted for the majority of justifications across most uses. There was great variability in justification categories offered for each use, and some uses generated justification categories not covered within the 4N scheme, including humane treatment, prioritization of human lives, and sustainability arguments. This research provides a large-scope investigation of animal use justifications that moves beyond meat consumption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信