塑料注射成型过程多变量分析技术的比较

R. Ventura, X. Berjaga
{"title":"塑料注射成型过程多变量分析技术的比较","authors":"R. Ventura, X. Berjaga","doi":"10.1109/ETFA.2015.7301557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a comparison between several statistical discriminant analysis techniques applied to a plastic injection moulding process for monitoring quality of injected moulded parts. Comparison among different ways of training the system can provide useful conclusions about the behaviour of the different models in poor conditions. The goal of this paper is to establish a baseline for comparing the performance between different algorithms. A wide variety of research objectives throughout the literature makes it difficult to provide a feasible comparison between results. The evaluation is intended to provide detailed, empirical information on the effectiveness and impact of different model parameters on the performance of the different approaches. The pros and cons of the approaches used are discussed. In order to predict the quality of a plastic part, we extract a set of salient features that characterise an injection cycle and then match these features against a database of stored examples of predefined classes by using supervised classification. The database was created from 199 real plastic injections without any overlap between training and testing datasets.","PeriodicalId":6862,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA)","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of multivariate analysis techniques in plastic injection moulding process\",\"authors\":\"R. Ventura, X. Berjaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ETFA.2015.7301557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we present a comparison between several statistical discriminant analysis techniques applied to a plastic injection moulding process for monitoring quality of injected moulded parts. Comparison among different ways of training the system can provide useful conclusions about the behaviour of the different models in poor conditions. The goal of this paper is to establish a baseline for comparing the performance between different algorithms. A wide variety of research objectives throughout the literature makes it difficult to provide a feasible comparison between results. The evaluation is intended to provide detailed, empirical information on the effectiveness and impact of different model parameters on the performance of the different approaches. The pros and cons of the approaches used are discussed. In order to predict the quality of a plastic part, we extract a set of salient features that characterise an injection cycle and then match these features against a database of stored examples of predefined classes by using supervised classification. The database was created from 199 real plastic injections without any overlap between training and testing datasets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2015.7301557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2015.7301557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了几种统计判别分析技术之间的比较应用于塑料注射成型过程中监测注塑件的质量。不同训练方法之间的比较可以提供关于不同模型在恶劣条件下的行为的有用结论。本文的目标是建立一个基线来比较不同算法之间的性能。在整个文献中,各种各样的研究目标使得很难在结果之间提供可行的比较。评估旨在提供关于不同模型参数对不同方法性能的有效性和影响的详细经验信息。讨论了所用方法的优缺点。为了预测塑料零件的质量,我们提取了一组表征注射周期的显著特征,然后通过使用监督分类将这些特征与预定义类的存储示例数据库进行匹配。该数据库是由199次真实的塑料注射创建的,训练和测试数据集之间没有任何重叠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of multivariate analysis techniques in plastic injection moulding process
In this paper, we present a comparison between several statistical discriminant analysis techniques applied to a plastic injection moulding process for monitoring quality of injected moulded parts. Comparison among different ways of training the system can provide useful conclusions about the behaviour of the different models in poor conditions. The goal of this paper is to establish a baseline for comparing the performance between different algorithms. A wide variety of research objectives throughout the literature makes it difficult to provide a feasible comparison between results. The evaluation is intended to provide detailed, empirical information on the effectiveness and impact of different model parameters on the performance of the different approaches. The pros and cons of the approaches used are discussed. In order to predict the quality of a plastic part, we extract a set of salient features that characterise an injection cycle and then match these features against a database of stored examples of predefined classes by using supervised classification. The database was created from 199 real plastic injections without any overlap between training and testing datasets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信