{"title":"贝克汉姆诉霍金斯:会期音乐家对音乐版权的主张","authors":"Dominic Free","doi":"10.1080/14730980210001730511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The High Court judgment in Beckingham v. Hodgens , delivered in July but as yet unreported, revisits the issue of the backing musician’s entitlement to a share of the copyright in a song on which he has played. The decision seems to put the law in this area back on the right path, from which it had strayed in Hadley & Others v. Kemp (the Spandau Ballet case) [1999] EMLR 589. It also demonstrates the continuing divergence between conventions in the music industry and the law in relation to music copyright.","PeriodicalId":36418,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Entertainment Law Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"93-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beckingham v. Hodgens: The session musician's claim to music copyright\",\"authors\":\"Dominic Free\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14730980210001730511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The High Court judgment in Beckingham v. Hodgens , delivered in July but as yet unreported, revisits the issue of the backing musician’s entitlement to a share of the copyright in a song on which he has played. The decision seems to put the law in this area back on the right path, from which it had strayed in Hadley & Others v. Kemp (the Spandau Ballet case) [1999] EMLR 589. It also demonstrates the continuing divergence between conventions in the music industry and the law in relation to music copyright.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interactive Entertainment Law Review\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"93-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interactive Entertainment Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14730980210001730511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Entertainment Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14730980210001730511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
摘要
今年7月，高等法院在“贝克汉姆诉霍金斯案”(Beckingham v. Hodgens)一案中作出了判决，但尚未报道。该判决重新审视了伴唱音乐家对自己演奏过的歌曲享有版权分成的问题。这一决定似乎使这一领域的法律回到了正确的道路上，而在哈德利等人诉肯普案(Spandau Ballet案)[1999]EMLR 589中，法律已经偏离了这一道路。它还表明，在音乐产业的惯例和有关音乐版权的法律之间的持续分歧。
Beckingham v. Hodgens: The session musician's claim to music copyright
The High Court judgment in Beckingham v. Hodgens , delivered in July but as yet unreported, revisits the issue of the backing musician’s entitlement to a share of the copyright in a song on which he has played. The decision seems to put the law in this area back on the right path, from which it had strayed in Hadley & Others v. Kemp (the Spandau Ballet case) [1999] EMLR 589. It also demonstrates the continuing divergence between conventions in the music industry and the law in relation to music copyright.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
