基于细胞直径、比膜电容和利用微流体收缩通道的细胞质电导率的白细胞分类

Huiwen Tan, Minruihong Wang, Yi Zhang, Xukun Huang, Deyong Chen, Min-Hsien Wu, Junbo Wang, Jian Chen
{"title":"基于细胞直径、比膜电容和利用微流体收缩通道的细胞质电导率的白细胞分类","authors":"Huiwen Tan, Minruihong Wang, Yi Zhang, Xukun Huang, Deyong Chen, Min-Hsien Wu, Junbo Wang, Jian Chen","doi":"10.1109/Transducers50396.2021.9495490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports the classification of white blood cells based on cell diameter D<inf>c</inf>, specific membrane capacitance C<inf>sm</inf> and cytoplasmic conductivity <tex>$\\sigma_{\\text{cy}}$</tex> leveraging a double T-type constriction channel based microfluidic platform. As a demonstration, D<inf>c</inf>, C<inf>sm</inf> and <tex>$\\sigma_{\\text{cy}}$</tex> of granulocytes (<tex>$\\mathrm{n}_{\\text{cell}}=683$</tex>), monocytes (<tex>$\\mathrm{n}_{\\text{cell}}=203$</tex>) and lymphocytes (<tex>$\\mathrm{n}_{\\text{cell}}=856$</tex>) were quantified as <tex>$9.23\\pm 0.60$</tex> vs. <tex>$9.40\\pm 0.54$</tex> vs. <tex>$6.64\\pm 0.41\\ \\mu \\mathrm{m},\\ 1.22\\pm 0.20$</tex> vs. <tex>$1.55\\pm 0.40$</tex> vs. <tex>$1.54\\pm 0.27\\ \\mu \\mathrm{F}/\\text{cm}^{2},\\ 0.35\\pm 0.06$</tex> vs. <tex>$0.53\\pm 0.06$</tex> vs. <tex>$0.46 \\pm 0.06\\ \\mathrm{S}/\\mathrm{m}$</tex>. Successful classification rates of white blood cells were quantified as 71.6% (D<inf>c</inf>), 60.4% (C<inf>sm</inf>), 73.6% (<tex>$\\sigma_{\\text{cy}}$</tex>) and 95.2% (D<inf>c</inf> & C<inf>sm</inf> & <tex>$\\sigma_{\\text{cy}}$</tex>).","PeriodicalId":6814,"journal":{"name":"2021 21st International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (Transducers)","volume":"11 1","pages":"1028-1031"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of White Blood Cells Based on Cell Diameter, Specific Membrane Capacitance and Cytoplasmic Conductivity Leveraging Microfluidic Constriction Channel\",\"authors\":\"Huiwen Tan, Minruihong Wang, Yi Zhang, Xukun Huang, Deyong Chen, Min-Hsien Wu, Junbo Wang, Jian Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/Transducers50396.2021.9495490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports the classification of white blood cells based on cell diameter D<inf>c</inf>, specific membrane capacitance C<inf>sm</inf> and cytoplasmic conductivity <tex>$\\\\sigma_{\\\\text{cy}}$</tex> leveraging a double T-type constriction channel based microfluidic platform. As a demonstration, D<inf>c</inf>, C<inf>sm</inf> and <tex>$\\\\sigma_{\\\\text{cy}}$</tex> of granulocytes (<tex>$\\\\mathrm{n}_{\\\\text{cell}}=683$</tex>), monocytes (<tex>$\\\\mathrm{n}_{\\\\text{cell}}=203$</tex>) and lymphocytes (<tex>$\\\\mathrm{n}_{\\\\text{cell}}=856$</tex>) were quantified as <tex>$9.23\\\\pm 0.60$</tex> vs. <tex>$9.40\\\\pm 0.54$</tex> vs. <tex>$6.64\\\\pm 0.41\\\\ \\\\mu \\\\mathrm{m},\\\\ 1.22\\\\pm 0.20$</tex> vs. <tex>$1.55\\\\pm 0.40$</tex> vs. <tex>$1.54\\\\pm 0.27\\\\ \\\\mu \\\\mathrm{F}/\\\\text{cm}^{2},\\\\ 0.35\\\\pm 0.06$</tex> vs. <tex>$0.53\\\\pm 0.06$</tex> vs. <tex>$0.46 \\\\pm 0.06\\\\ \\\\mathrm{S}/\\\\mathrm{m}$</tex>. Successful classification rates of white blood cells were quantified as 71.6% (D<inf>c</inf>), 60.4% (C<inf>sm</inf>), 73.6% (<tex>$\\\\sigma_{\\\\text{cy}}$</tex>) and 95.2% (D<inf>c</inf> & C<inf>sm</inf> & <tex>$\\\\sigma_{\\\\text{cy}}$</tex>).\",\"PeriodicalId\":6814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 21st International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (Transducers)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"1028-1031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 21st International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (Transducers)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/Transducers50396.2021.9495490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 21st International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (Transducers)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Transducers50396.2021.9495490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文利用基于双t型收缩通道的微流控平台,基于细胞直径Dc、比膜电容Csm和细胞质电导率$\sigma_{\text{cy}}$对白细胞进行了分类。作为示范,将粒细胞($\mathrm{n}_{\text{cell}}=683$)、单核细胞($\mathrm{n}_{\text{cell}}=203$)和淋巴细胞($\mathrm{n}_{\text{cell}}=856$)的Dc、Csm和$\sigma_{\text{cy}}$量化为$9.23\pm 0.60$ vs. $9.40\pm 0.54$ vs. $6.64\pm 0.41\ \mu \mathrm{m},\ 1.22\pm 0.20$ vs. $1.55\pm 0.40$ vs. $1.54\pm 0.27\ \mu \mathrm{F}/\text{cm}^{2},\ 0.35\pm 0.06$ vs. $0.53\pm 0.06$ vs. $0.46 \pm 0.06\ \mathrm{S}/\mathrm{m}$。白细胞分类成功率量化为71.6% (Dc), 60.4% (Csm), 73.6% ($\sigma_{\text{cy}}$) and 95.2% (Dc & Csm & $\sigma_{\text{cy}}$).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classification of White Blood Cells Based on Cell Diameter, Specific Membrane Capacitance and Cytoplasmic Conductivity Leveraging Microfluidic Constriction Channel
This paper reports the classification of white blood cells based on cell diameter Dc, specific membrane capacitance Csm and cytoplasmic conductivity $\sigma_{\text{cy}}$ leveraging a double T-type constriction channel based microfluidic platform. As a demonstration, Dc, Csm and $\sigma_{\text{cy}}$ of granulocytes ($\mathrm{n}_{\text{cell}}=683$), monocytes ($\mathrm{n}_{\text{cell}}=203$) and lymphocytes ($\mathrm{n}_{\text{cell}}=856$) were quantified as $9.23\pm 0.60$ vs. $9.40\pm 0.54$ vs. $6.64\pm 0.41\ \mu \mathrm{m},\ 1.22\pm 0.20$ vs. $1.55\pm 0.40$ vs. $1.54\pm 0.27\ \mu \mathrm{F}/\text{cm}^{2},\ 0.35\pm 0.06$ vs. $0.53\pm 0.06$ vs. $0.46 \pm 0.06\ \mathrm{S}/\mathrm{m}$. Successful classification rates of white blood cells were quantified as 71.6% (Dc), 60.4% (Csm), 73.6% ($\sigma_{\text{cy}}$) and 95.2% (Dc & Csm & $\sigma_{\text{cy}}$).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信