在人工智能中实现可信度——详细讨论

IF 0.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 Engineering
Siddhartha Vadlamudi
{"title":"在人工智能中实现可信度——详细讨论","authors":"Siddhartha Vadlamudi","doi":"10.18034/ei.v3i2.519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) delivers numerous chances to add to the prosperity of people and the stability of economies and society, yet besides, it adds up a variety of novel moral, legal, social, and innovative difficulties. Trustworthy AI (TAI) bases on the possibility that trust builds the establishment of various societies, economies, and sustainable turn of events, and that people, organizations, and societies can along these lines just at any point understand the maximum capacity of AI, if trust can be set up in its development, deployment, and use. The risks of unintended and negative outcomes related to AI are proportionately high, particularly at scale. Most AI is really artificial narrow intelligence, intended to achieve a specific task on previously curated information from a certain source. Since most AI models expand on correlations, predictions could fail to sum up to various populations or settings and might fuel existing disparities and biases. As the AI industry is amazingly imbalanced, and experts are as of now overpowered by other digital devices, there could be a little capacity to catch blunders. With this article, we aim to present the idea of TAI and its five essential standards (1) usefulness, (2) non-maleficence, (3) autonomy, (4) justice, and (5) logic. We further draw on these five standards to build up a data-driven analysis for TAI and present its application by portraying productive paths for future research, especially as to the distributed ledger technology-based acknowledgment of TAI.","PeriodicalId":49736,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enabling Trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence - A Detailed Discussion\",\"authors\":\"Siddhartha Vadlamudi\",\"doi\":\"10.18034/ei.v3i2.519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial intelligence (AI) delivers numerous chances to add to the prosperity of people and the stability of economies and society, yet besides, it adds up a variety of novel moral, legal, social, and innovative difficulties. Trustworthy AI (TAI) bases on the possibility that trust builds the establishment of various societies, economies, and sustainable turn of events, and that people, organizations, and societies can along these lines just at any point understand the maximum capacity of AI, if trust can be set up in its development, deployment, and use. The risks of unintended and negative outcomes related to AI are proportionately high, particularly at scale. Most AI is really artificial narrow intelligence, intended to achieve a specific task on previously curated information from a certain source. Since most AI models expand on correlations, predictions could fail to sum up to various populations or settings and might fuel existing disparities and biases. As the AI industry is amazingly imbalanced, and experts are as of now overpowered by other digital devices, there could be a little capacity to catch blunders. With this article, we aim to present the idea of TAI and its five essential standards (1) usefulness, (2) non-maleficence, (3) autonomy, (4) justice, and (5) logic. We further draw on these five standards to build up a data-driven analysis for TAI and present its application by portraying productive paths for future research, especially as to the distributed ledger technology-based acknowledgment of TAI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Engineering International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Engineering International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18034/ei.v3i2.519\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering International","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18034/ei.v3i2.519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

人工智能(AI)为人类的繁荣和经济社会的稳定提供了许多机会,但同时也带来了各种新的道德、法律、社会和创新难题。值得信赖的人工智能(TAI)基于信任建立各种社会、经济和可持续发展的可能性,如果在人工智能的开发、部署和使用中能够建立信任,那么人们、组织和社会可以在任何时候理解人工智能的最大能力。与人工智能相关的意外和负面结果的风险相当高,特别是在规模上。大多数人工智能都是狭义的人工智能,旨在根据特定来源的预先策划信息完成特定任务。由于大多数人工智能模型扩展了相关性,预测可能无法总结不同的人群或环境,并可能加剧现有的差异和偏见。由于人工智能行业非常不平衡,专家们目前被其他数字设备所压倒,因此可能有一点能力来发现错误。在本文中,我们旨在介绍TAI的概念及其五个基本标准(1)有用性,(2)非恶意性,(3)自主性,(4)正义和(5)逻辑性。我们进一步借鉴这五个标准,为TAI建立一个数据驱动的分析,并通过描绘未来研究的生产路径来展示其应用,特别是基于分布式账本技术的TAI确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enabling Trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence - A Detailed Discussion
Artificial intelligence (AI) delivers numerous chances to add to the prosperity of people and the stability of economies and society, yet besides, it adds up a variety of novel moral, legal, social, and innovative difficulties. Trustworthy AI (TAI) bases on the possibility that trust builds the establishment of various societies, economies, and sustainable turn of events, and that people, organizations, and societies can along these lines just at any point understand the maximum capacity of AI, if trust can be set up in its development, deployment, and use. The risks of unintended and negative outcomes related to AI are proportionately high, particularly at scale. Most AI is really artificial narrow intelligence, intended to achieve a specific task on previously curated information from a certain source. Since most AI models expand on correlations, predictions could fail to sum up to various populations or settings and might fuel existing disparities and biases. As the AI industry is amazingly imbalanced, and experts are as of now overpowered by other digital devices, there could be a little capacity to catch blunders. With this article, we aim to present the idea of TAI and its five essential standards (1) usefulness, (2) non-maleficence, (3) autonomy, (4) justice, and (5) logic. We further draw on these five standards to build up a data-driven analysis for TAI and present its application by portraying productive paths for future research, especially as to the distributed ledger technology-based acknowledgment of TAI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering International
Nuclear Engineering International 工程技术-核科学技术
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信