在姑息治疗中实现居家:从住院病人和家庭的角度设计建筑环境

Rebecca Mclaughlan, Kieran Richards
{"title":"在姑息治疗中实现居家:从住院病人和家庭的角度设计建筑环境","authors":"Rebecca Mclaughlan, Kieran Richards","doi":"10.1080/24735132.2023.2228599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reports 36 in-depth interviews with patients (n = 20) and family members of palliative care patients (n = 16), during an inpatient stay within one of four contemporary palliative care facilities. Interviews were conducted to understand how patients and families felt the built environment supported their experience of palliative care, and the ways that it did not. Over the past decade, a growing body of literature has sought to understand how architectural design can support wellbeing within palliative care settings. Yet, despite evidence that promotes the prioritization of privacy, homeliness, and nature, the sheer complexity of hospital procurement often results in compromises to the successful implementation of best design practice. Here we argue that a deeper understanding of what these environmental affordances mean to patients being treated for a terminal illness, and to their families, may encourage a necessary re-examination of the ease with which these provisions are compromised relative to considerations of risk, cost, or convenience (in building construction and/or maintenance). Importantly, our findings confirm that privacy, homeliness, and nature do not operate in isolation but in accord to shape experiences of palliative care.","PeriodicalId":92348,"journal":{"name":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","volume":"1 1","pages":"138 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realizing homeliness in palliative care: inpatient and family perspectives on designing the built environment\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Mclaughlan, Kieran Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24735132.2023.2228599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article reports 36 in-depth interviews with patients (n = 20) and family members of palliative care patients (n = 16), during an inpatient stay within one of four contemporary palliative care facilities. Interviews were conducted to understand how patients and families felt the built environment supported their experience of palliative care, and the ways that it did not. Over the past decade, a growing body of literature has sought to understand how architectural design can support wellbeing within palliative care settings. Yet, despite evidence that promotes the prioritization of privacy, homeliness, and nature, the sheer complexity of hospital procurement often results in compromises to the successful implementation of best design practice. Here we argue that a deeper understanding of what these environmental affordances mean to patients being treated for a terminal illness, and to their families, may encourage a necessary re-examination of the ease with which these provisions are compromised relative to considerations of risk, cost, or convenience (in building construction and/or maintenance). Importantly, our findings confirm that privacy, homeliness, and nature do not operate in isolation but in accord to shape experiences of palliative care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design for health (Abingdon, England)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"138 - 157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design for health (Abingdon, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2023.2228599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2023.2228599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文报道了36个深度访谈患者(n = 20)和姑息治疗患者的家属(n = 16),在四个现代姑息治疗机构之一的住院期间。进行访谈以了解患者和家属如何认为建筑环境支持他们的姑息治疗体验,以及它没有的方式。在过去的十年中,越来越多的文献试图理解建筑设计如何在姑息治疗环境中支持健康。然而,尽管有证据表明要优先考虑隐私、舒适和自然,但医院采购的复杂性往往会影响最佳设计实践的成功实施。在这里,我们认为,更深入地了解这些环境负担对接受绝症治疗的患者及其家属意味着什么,可能会鼓励对这些规定相对于风险、成本或便利性(在建筑建设和/或维护方面)的考虑进行必要的重新检查。重要的是,我们的研究结果证实,隐私、居家和自然并不是孤立的,而是一致地塑造了姑息治疗的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Realizing homeliness in palliative care: inpatient and family perspectives on designing the built environment
Abstract This article reports 36 in-depth interviews with patients (n = 20) and family members of palliative care patients (n = 16), during an inpatient stay within one of four contemporary palliative care facilities. Interviews were conducted to understand how patients and families felt the built environment supported their experience of palliative care, and the ways that it did not. Over the past decade, a growing body of literature has sought to understand how architectural design can support wellbeing within palliative care settings. Yet, despite evidence that promotes the prioritization of privacy, homeliness, and nature, the sheer complexity of hospital procurement often results in compromises to the successful implementation of best design practice. Here we argue that a deeper understanding of what these environmental affordances mean to patients being treated for a terminal illness, and to their families, may encourage a necessary re-examination of the ease with which these provisions are compromised relative to considerations of risk, cost, or convenience (in building construction and/or maintenance). Importantly, our findings confirm that privacy, homeliness, and nature do not operate in isolation but in accord to shape experiences of palliative care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信