公证活动中证明的概念及特点

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Ekaterina V. Pogosyan
{"title":"公证活动中证明的概念及特点","authors":"Ekaterina V. Pogosyan","doi":"10.21638/spbu14.2022.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines some problems related to proof in notarial activities and substantiates the relevance of those provisions of legislation for strengthening the role of the notary in the process of proof by introducing categories of limits and standards in notarial activities. The establishment of limits of notarial proof increases the meaning of certain clauses of the agreement (what exactly was checked and proved by the notary) and serves as the basis for an adequate solution to the issue of evidentiary value of the notarial deed, reflecting the results of the explanatory and verification activities of the notary. In the subject of proof in notarial proceedings, it is proposed to include documents, information, and statements containing information on the presence or absence of certain facts of legal significance necessary for the performance of a notarial act. Examining certain provisions of notary legislation, the author concludes that there exists a presumption in the notarial process that should be understood as provisions according to which a particular fact is considered unproven if a significant violation of the notarial form is committed. Based on examples from judicial and notarial practice, it is concluded that the main task of legal regulation of the procedure of notarial proof is to create conditions for a comprehensive establishment by a notary of the circumstances that took place in the relationship between the parties to notarial proceedings in order to eliminate subjective factors associated with the peculiarities of perception of the same type of legal relationship by subjects with different levels of psychological perception.","PeriodicalId":41041,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concept and special features of proving in notarial activities\",\"authors\":\"Ekaterina V. Pogosyan\",\"doi\":\"10.21638/spbu14.2022.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines some problems related to proof in notarial activities and substantiates the relevance of those provisions of legislation for strengthening the role of the notary in the process of proof by introducing categories of limits and standards in notarial activities. The establishment of limits of notarial proof increases the meaning of certain clauses of the agreement (what exactly was checked and proved by the notary) and serves as the basis for an adequate solution to the issue of evidentiary value of the notarial deed, reflecting the results of the explanatory and verification activities of the notary. In the subject of proof in notarial proceedings, it is proposed to include documents, information, and statements containing information on the presence or absence of certain facts of legal significance necessary for the performance of a notarial act. Examining certain provisions of notary legislation, the author concludes that there exists a presumption in the notarial process that should be understood as provisions according to which a particular fact is considered unproven if a significant violation of the notarial form is committed. Based on examples from judicial and notarial practice, it is concluded that the main task of legal regulation of the procedure of notarial proof is to create conditions for a comprehensive establishment by a notary of the circumstances that took place in the relationship between the parties to notarial proceedings in order to eliminate subjective factors associated with the peculiarities of perception of the same type of legal relationship by subjects with different levels of psychological perception.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过介绍公证活动的限制类别和标准,考察了公证活动中有关证明的一些问题,并论证了这些立法规定对于加强公证员在证明过程中的作用的相关性。公证证明限度的确立,增加了协议中某些条款的含义(公证员究竟核查和证明了什么),是充分解决公证契据证据价值问题的基础,反映了公证员解释和核查活动的结果。在公证程序的证明主体中,建议包括包含关于履行公证行为所必需的某些具有法律意义的事实是否存在的信息的文件、信息和陈述。考察公证立法的某些规定,笔者认为在公证过程中存在一种推定,这种推定应当理解为,如果发生了重大违反公证形式的行为,就认为某一特定事实无法证明。以司法和公证实践为例,认为公证证明程序法律规制的主要任务是为公证员对公证诉讼当事人关系中所发生的情况的综合确立创造条件,以消除不同心理感知水平的主体对同一类型法律关系感知的特殊性所带来的主观因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concept and special features of proving in notarial activities
The article examines some problems related to proof in notarial activities and substantiates the relevance of those provisions of legislation for strengthening the role of the notary in the process of proof by introducing categories of limits and standards in notarial activities. The establishment of limits of notarial proof increases the meaning of certain clauses of the agreement (what exactly was checked and proved by the notary) and serves as the basis for an adequate solution to the issue of evidentiary value of the notarial deed, reflecting the results of the explanatory and verification activities of the notary. In the subject of proof in notarial proceedings, it is proposed to include documents, information, and statements containing information on the presence or absence of certain facts of legal significance necessary for the performance of a notarial act. Examining certain provisions of notary legislation, the author concludes that there exists a presumption in the notarial process that should be understood as provisions according to which a particular fact is considered unproven if a significant violation of the notarial form is committed. Based on examples from judicial and notarial practice, it is concluded that the main task of legal regulation of the procedure of notarial proof is to create conditions for a comprehensive establishment by a notary of the circumstances that took place in the relationship between the parties to notarial proceedings in order to eliminate subjective factors associated with the peculiarities of perception of the same type of legal relationship by subjects with different levels of psychological perception.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信