{"title":"预要求或共同要求:评估为什么化学工程学生选择选修一门课程作为先决条件或作为必要条件","authors":"Jonathan Lopez, J. Shaffer","doi":"10.18260/2-1-370.660-122075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our chemical engineering curricula, students may enroll in introductory thermodynamics as a prerequisite to or as a corequisite with material and energy balances (MEB). We sought to determine why students enrolled in these courses in a given sequence whether it impacts performance. Students’ enrollment decisions were mostly based on logistics such as curriculum guides and scheduling issues. Students who enrolled in thermodynamics before MEB may have outperformed students who took them together.","PeriodicalId":72557,"journal":{"name":"Chemical engineering education","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Pre-req or Co-req: An Assessment of Why Chemical Engineering Students Elect to Take a Course as a Prerequisite or as a Corequisite\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Lopez, J. Shaffer\",\"doi\":\"10.18260/2-1-370.660-122075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In our chemical engineering curricula, students may enroll in introductory thermodynamics as a prerequisite to or as a corequisite with material and energy balances (MEB). We sought to determine why students enrolled in these courses in a given sequence whether it impacts performance. Students’ enrollment decisions were mostly based on logistics such as curriculum guides and scheduling issues. Students who enrolled in thermodynamics before MEB may have outperformed students who took them together.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical engineering education\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical engineering education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18260/2-1-370.660-122075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical engineering education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18260/2-1-370.660-122075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
To Pre-req or Co-req: An Assessment of Why Chemical Engineering Students Elect to Take a Course as a Prerequisite or as a Corequisite
In our chemical engineering curricula, students may enroll in introductory thermodynamics as a prerequisite to or as a corequisite with material and energy balances (MEB). We sought to determine why students enrolled in these courses in a given sequence whether it impacts performance. Students’ enrollment decisions were mostly based on logistics such as curriculum guides and scheduling issues. Students who enrolled in thermodynamics before MEB may have outperformed students who took them together.