R. Benedikter, Carlos Cruz Infante, Miguel Zlosilo
{"title":"智利民主的未来","authors":"R. Benedikter, Carlos Cruz Infante, Miguel Zlosilo","doi":"10.1080/05775132.2021.1881294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The situation in Chile after the Constitutional Referendum of October 2020 posits the question: Where is the country headed? Is this the end of a long transition from “adolescent” neoliberal democracy to “mature” welfare democracy—or the start of a new era of uncertainty? Without substantial improvements of the constitutional reform process, its building stones and surrounding conditions, the country is not ready for a systemic transition in reconciliatory and secure manners.","PeriodicalId":88850,"journal":{"name":"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)","volume":"64 1","pages":"172 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Future of Democracy in Chile\",\"authors\":\"R. Benedikter, Carlos Cruz Infante, Miguel Zlosilo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/05775132.2021.1881294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The situation in Chile after the Constitutional Referendum of October 2020 posits the question: Where is the country headed? Is this the end of a long transition from “adolescent” neoliberal democracy to “mature” welfare democracy—or the start of a new era of uncertainty? Without substantial improvements of the constitutional reform process, its building stones and surrounding conditions, the country is not ready for a systemic transition in reconciliatory and secure manners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"172 - 180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2021.1881294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2021.1881294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract The situation in Chile after the Constitutional Referendum of October 2020 posits the question: Where is the country headed? Is this the end of a long transition from “adolescent” neoliberal democracy to “mature” welfare democracy—or the start of a new era of uncertainty? Without substantial improvements of the constitutional reform process, its building stones and surrounding conditions, the country is not ready for a systemic transition in reconciliatory and secure manners.