{"title":"解剖和血液供应的下四颅颈神经:与外科颈部解剖的关系。","authors":"H. Brown, G. Hidden, M. Ledroux, L. Poitevan","doi":"10.1111/J.1525-1373.2000.22350.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is a continuation of previous work searching for possible anatomic reasons to explain variable and usually unpredictable postoperative pain and dysfunction after the same nerve losses with similar neck dissection operations. The study consisted of dissections of 19 deceased unpreserved elderly subjects arterially injected with dyed latex. Of the 19 subjects, 14 had brain stem and cervical spinal cord dissections, and all had neck dissections. The findings suggested two possible anatomic reasons for the pain and dysfunction: (i) The intracranial anatomy of the lower four cranial nerves, the glossopharyngeal (IX), the vagus (X), the spinal accessory (XI), and the hypoglossal (XII), was just as variable as the previously reported peripheral spinal accessory nerve plexus; and (ii) Both the intracranial and neck dissections indicated that the blood supply to the lower four cranial and cervical nerves, particularly to the brachial plexus, could be impaired by atherosclerosis and/or neuroforaminal impingement or operative loss. This loss of blood supply theoretically could result in ischemia as another possible cause of postoperative pain and dysfunction. It is concluded that because of the potential importance of each nerve and vessel, often unknown at operation, it is very important to spare as many of them as possible to avoid subsequent painful impairment.","PeriodicalId":20618,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine","volume":"52-54 1","pages":"352-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomy and blood supply of the lower four cranial and cervical nerves: relevance to surgical neck dissection.\",\"authors\":\"H. Brown, G. Hidden, M. Ledroux, L. Poitevan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1525-1373.2000.22350.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is a continuation of previous work searching for possible anatomic reasons to explain variable and usually unpredictable postoperative pain and dysfunction after the same nerve losses with similar neck dissection operations. The study consisted of dissections of 19 deceased unpreserved elderly subjects arterially injected with dyed latex. Of the 19 subjects, 14 had brain stem and cervical spinal cord dissections, and all had neck dissections. The findings suggested two possible anatomic reasons for the pain and dysfunction: (i) The intracranial anatomy of the lower four cranial nerves, the glossopharyngeal (IX), the vagus (X), the spinal accessory (XI), and the hypoglossal (XII), was just as variable as the previously reported peripheral spinal accessory nerve plexus; and (ii) Both the intracranial and neck dissections indicated that the blood supply to the lower four cranial and cervical nerves, particularly to the brachial plexus, could be impaired by atherosclerosis and/or neuroforaminal impingement or operative loss. This loss of blood supply theoretically could result in ischemia as another possible cause of postoperative pain and dysfunction. It is concluded that because of the potential importance of each nerve and vessel, often unknown at operation, it is very important to spare as many of them as possible to avoid subsequent painful impairment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"52-54 1\",\"pages\":\"352-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1525-1373.2000.22350.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1525-1373.2000.22350.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anatomy and blood supply of the lower four cranial and cervical nerves: relevance to surgical neck dissection.
This study is a continuation of previous work searching for possible anatomic reasons to explain variable and usually unpredictable postoperative pain and dysfunction after the same nerve losses with similar neck dissection operations. The study consisted of dissections of 19 deceased unpreserved elderly subjects arterially injected with dyed latex. Of the 19 subjects, 14 had brain stem and cervical spinal cord dissections, and all had neck dissections. The findings suggested two possible anatomic reasons for the pain and dysfunction: (i) The intracranial anatomy of the lower four cranial nerves, the glossopharyngeal (IX), the vagus (X), the spinal accessory (XI), and the hypoglossal (XII), was just as variable as the previously reported peripheral spinal accessory nerve plexus; and (ii) Both the intracranial and neck dissections indicated that the blood supply to the lower four cranial and cervical nerves, particularly to the brachial plexus, could be impaired by atherosclerosis and/or neuroforaminal impingement or operative loss. This loss of blood supply theoretically could result in ischemia as another possible cause of postoperative pain and dysfunction. It is concluded that because of the potential importance of each nerve and vessel, often unknown at operation, it is very important to spare as many of them as possible to avoid subsequent painful impairment.