RDF知识库的准确性评估研究

Diego Esteves, A. Rula, Aniketh Janardhan Reddy, Jens Lehmann
{"title":"RDF知识库的准确性评估研究","authors":"Diego Esteves, A. Rula, Aniketh Janardhan Reddy, Jens Lehmann","doi":"10.1145/3177873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among different characteristics of knowledge bases, data quality is one of the most relevant to maximize the benefits of the provided information. Knowledge base quality assessment poses a number of big data challenges such as high volume, variety, velocity, and veracity. In this article, we focus on answering questions related to the assessment of the veracity of facts through Deep Fact Validation (DeFacto), a triple validation framework designed to assess facts in RDF knowledge bases. Despite current developments in the research area, the underlying framework faces many challenges. This article pinpoints and discusses these issues and conducts a thorough analysis of its pipeline, aiming at reducing the error propagation through its components. Furthermore, we discuss recent developments related to this fact validation as well as describing advantages and drawbacks of state-of-the-art models. As a result of this exploratory analysis, we give insights and directions toward a better architecture to tackle the complex task of fact-checking in knowledge bases.","PeriodicalId":15582,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)","volume":"4 1","pages":"1 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward Veracity Assessment in RDF Knowledge Bases\",\"authors\":\"Diego Esteves, A. Rula, Aniketh Janardhan Reddy, Jens Lehmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3177873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among different characteristics of knowledge bases, data quality is one of the most relevant to maximize the benefits of the provided information. Knowledge base quality assessment poses a number of big data challenges such as high volume, variety, velocity, and veracity. In this article, we focus on answering questions related to the assessment of the veracity of facts through Deep Fact Validation (DeFacto), a triple validation framework designed to assess facts in RDF knowledge bases. Despite current developments in the research area, the underlying framework faces many challenges. This article pinpoints and discusses these issues and conducts a thorough analysis of its pipeline, aiming at reducing the error propagation through its components. Furthermore, we discuss recent developments related to this fact validation as well as describing advantages and drawbacks of state-of-the-art models. As a result of this exploratory analysis, we give insights and directions toward a better architecture to tackle the complex task of fact-checking in knowledge bases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3177873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3177873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在知识库的不同特征中,数据质量是与所提供信息的利益最大化最相关的特征之一。知识库质量评估提出了许多大数据挑战,如大容量、多样性、速度和准确性。在本文中,我们将重点回答与通过深度事实验证(DeFacto)评估事实真实性相关的问题,深度事实验证是一个三重验证框架,旨在评估RDF知识库中的事实。尽管目前在研究领域取得了进展,但其基础框架仍面临许多挑战。本文指出并讨论了这些问题,并对其管道进行了深入的分析,旨在减少通过其组件传播的错误。此外,我们讨论了与这一事实验证相关的最新发展,并描述了最先进模型的优点和缺点。作为这种探索性分析的结果,我们给出了更好的体系结构的见解和方向,以处理知识库中事实检查的复杂任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward Veracity Assessment in RDF Knowledge Bases
Among different characteristics of knowledge bases, data quality is one of the most relevant to maximize the benefits of the provided information. Knowledge base quality assessment poses a number of big data challenges such as high volume, variety, velocity, and veracity. In this article, we focus on answering questions related to the assessment of the veracity of facts through Deep Fact Validation (DeFacto), a triple validation framework designed to assess facts in RDF knowledge bases. Despite current developments in the research area, the underlying framework faces many challenges. This article pinpoints and discusses these issues and conducts a thorough analysis of its pipeline, aiming at reducing the error propagation through its components. Furthermore, we discuss recent developments related to this fact validation as well as describing advantages and drawbacks of state-of-the-art models. As a result of this exploratory analysis, we give insights and directions toward a better architecture to tackle the complex task of fact-checking in knowledge bases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信