密西拿的读者:重新考虑文学意义

B. Wimpfheimer
{"title":"密西拿的读者:重新考虑文学意义","authors":"B. Wimpfheimer","doi":"10.1353/jqr.2023.a904503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The Mishnah is both the best-organized work of rabbinic literature and not entirely consistent in its organization. These aspects led to robust scholarly debates about the Mishnah as a work of literature. Recent overview scholarship has highlighted the inconsistency and refused to attempt to define the Mishnah's literary genre. This essay draws on three common mishnaic phenomena to highlight the ways the Mishnah asks to be read. It argues that the Mishnah employs legal couplets (paired statutory case presentations) to communicate the presence of underlying conceptual meaning and to train the reader to mine the text for such meaning. It shows that the Mishnah stacks couplets like building blocks to produce ever-richer conceptual understandings of mishnaic information. Finally, it highlights and embraces the role that readers must play in producing the Mishnah's fullest meaning.","PeriodicalId":22606,"journal":{"name":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"335 - 367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mishnah's Reader: Reconsidering Literary Meaning\",\"authors\":\"B. Wimpfheimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jqr.2023.a904503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The Mishnah is both the best-organized work of rabbinic literature and not entirely consistent in its organization. These aspects led to robust scholarly debates about the Mishnah as a work of literature. Recent overview scholarship has highlighted the inconsistency and refused to attempt to define the Mishnah's literary genre. This essay draws on three common mishnaic phenomena to highlight the ways the Mishnah asks to be read. It argues that the Mishnah employs legal couplets (paired statutory case presentations) to communicate the presence of underlying conceptual meaning and to train the reader to mine the text for such meaning. It shows that the Mishnah stacks couplets like building blocks to produce ever-richer conceptual understandings of mishnaic information. Finally, it highlights and embraces the role that readers must play in producing the Mishnah's fullest meaning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Jewish Quarterly Review\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"335 - 367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Jewish Quarterly Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2023.a904503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2023.a904503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:《密西拿》既是组织最好的拉比文学作品,也是组织不完全一致的作品。这些方面导致了关于密西拿作为文学作品的激烈学术辩论。最近的学术综述强调了这种不一致性,并拒绝尝试定义密西拿的文学类型。这篇文章利用三种常见的密西拿现象来强调密西拿要求被阅读的方式。它认为密西拿使用法律对联(成对的法定案例陈述)来传达潜在概念意义的存在,并训练读者挖掘文本的这种意义。它表明密西拿像积木一样堆叠对联,以产生对密西拿信息更丰富的概念性理解。最后,它强调并拥抱读者在产生密西拿最充分的意义中必须发挥的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Mishnah's Reader: Reconsidering Literary Meaning
Abstract:The Mishnah is both the best-organized work of rabbinic literature and not entirely consistent in its organization. These aspects led to robust scholarly debates about the Mishnah as a work of literature. Recent overview scholarship has highlighted the inconsistency and refused to attempt to define the Mishnah's literary genre. This essay draws on three common mishnaic phenomena to highlight the ways the Mishnah asks to be read. It argues that the Mishnah employs legal couplets (paired statutory case presentations) to communicate the presence of underlying conceptual meaning and to train the reader to mine the text for such meaning. It shows that the Mishnah stacks couplets like building blocks to produce ever-richer conceptual understandings of mishnaic information. Finally, it highlights and embraces the role that readers must play in producing the Mishnah's fullest meaning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信