同化:另一种历史

IF 1.3 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Katlyn E. Williams
{"title":"同化:另一种历史","authors":"Katlyn E. Williams","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2022.2144188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"petuated by deportations are lacking in Goodman’s analysis. The story of immigration told in Goodman’s book is largely focused on racial categories, moving from its beginnings in Chinese communities into the demonization of Latina/o/x immigrants. In an analysis of coercive immigrant violence, the lack of intersectional discussions (namely, of women and queer migrants) leaves the story wholly incomplete and, as a reader, it left me wanting. I recommend The Deportation Machine as an excellent primer for deportations and coercive immigrant violence, rather than treat it as an exhaustive account. Goodman’s history broadens the definition of deportations, providing the reader with an appreciation of the dark side of immigration enforcement in the United States. Goodman’s undertaking is a reminder that no history is truly lost in the modern age, that even the best efforts of the state cannot erase their sins from recording. His clearly laid out history provides the reader with a renewed appreciation of complexity of the machine, and how it dehumanizes and demonizes its subjects. While not perfect in its nuance, it provides an excellent framework for scholars to investigate the machine and to build on the vast archive of texts that Goodman provides.","PeriodicalId":51545,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","volume":"11 1","pages":"464 - 468"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assimilation: An Alternative History\",\"authors\":\"Katlyn E. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00335630.2022.2144188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"petuated by deportations are lacking in Goodman’s analysis. The story of immigration told in Goodman’s book is largely focused on racial categories, moving from its beginnings in Chinese communities into the demonization of Latina/o/x immigrants. In an analysis of coercive immigrant violence, the lack of intersectional discussions (namely, of women and queer migrants) leaves the story wholly incomplete and, as a reader, it left me wanting. I recommend The Deportation Machine as an excellent primer for deportations and coercive immigrant violence, rather than treat it as an exhaustive account. Goodman’s history broadens the definition of deportations, providing the reader with an appreciation of the dark side of immigration enforcement in the United States. Goodman’s undertaking is a reminder that no history is truly lost in the modern age, that even the best efforts of the state cannot erase their sins from recording. His clearly laid out history provides the reader with a renewed appreciation of complexity of the machine, and how it dehumanizes and demonizes its subjects. While not perfect in its nuance, it provides an excellent framework for scholars to investigate the machine and to build on the vast archive of texts that Goodman provides.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Speech\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"464 - 468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Speech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2022.2144188\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2022.2144188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在古德曼的分析中缺乏被驱逐出境的情况。古德曼在书中讲述的移民故事主要集中在种族类别上,从华人社区开始,到对拉丁裔/非裔/非裔移民的妖魔化。在对强制性移民暴力的分析中,缺乏交叉讨论(即女性和酷儿移民),使得这个故事完全不完整,作为读者,它让我感到失望。我推荐《驱逐机器》作为了解驱逐和强制移民暴力的优秀入门读物,而不是将其视为详尽的描述。古德曼的历史拓宽了驱逐出境的定义,让读者了解到美国移民执法的阴暗面。古德曼的努力提醒我们,在现代,没有历史是真正丢失的,即使国家尽了最大的努力,也无法从记录中抹去他们的罪恶。他清晰地展现了历史,让读者重新认识到机器的复杂性,以及它是如何将其主体非人化和妖魔化的。虽然它的细微差别并不完美,但它为学者们提供了一个很好的框架来研究这台机器,并在古德曼提供的大量文本档案的基础上建立起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assimilation: An Alternative History
petuated by deportations are lacking in Goodman’s analysis. The story of immigration told in Goodman’s book is largely focused on racial categories, moving from its beginnings in Chinese communities into the demonization of Latina/o/x immigrants. In an analysis of coercive immigrant violence, the lack of intersectional discussions (namely, of women and queer migrants) leaves the story wholly incomplete and, as a reader, it left me wanting. I recommend The Deportation Machine as an excellent primer for deportations and coercive immigrant violence, rather than treat it as an exhaustive account. Goodman’s history broadens the definition of deportations, providing the reader with an appreciation of the dark side of immigration enforcement in the United States. Goodman’s undertaking is a reminder that no history is truly lost in the modern age, that even the best efforts of the state cannot erase their sins from recording. His clearly laid out history provides the reader with a renewed appreciation of complexity of the machine, and how it dehumanizes and demonizes its subjects. While not perfect in its nuance, it provides an excellent framework for scholars to investigate the machine and to build on the vast archive of texts that Goodman provides.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
36.40%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of Speech (QJS) publishes articles and book reviews of interest to those who take a rhetorical perspective on the texts, discourses, and cultural practices by which public beliefs and identities are constituted, empowered, and enacted. Rhetorical scholarship now cuts across many different intellectual, disciplinary, and political vectors, and QJS seeks to honor and address the interanimating effects of such differences. No single project, whether modern or postmodern in its orientation, or local, national, or global in its scope, can suffice as the sole locus of rhetorical practice, knowledge and understanding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信