斯里兰卡小流域分析的日和月集总参数水文模型

G. Perera, R. Rajapakse
{"title":"斯里兰卡小流域分析的日和月集总参数水文模型","authors":"G. Perera, R. Rajapakse","doi":"10.1109/MERCON.2018.8421989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water resource management has become vital with the increase of demand for fresh water and modelling of ungauged basins under the conditions of data scarcity has always been a challenge. The two-parameter (2-P) and four-parameter (4-P) models have been used in this study to simulate the response of two river basins Maha Oya and Kelani River in Sri Lanka in an attempt to investigate the potential of these lumped parameter models. Both daily and monthly rainfall and streamflow data sets have been used to evaluate the model performance. Two key performance indices, Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PC) and Mean Relative Error (MRE) have been used as objective functions to compare goodness of fit of the observed and simulated streamflow. The two models were calibrated and validated for 2011~2014 and 2008~2010 periods, respectively. Based on the comparison of the results, it was found that the 4-P model provides a greater accuracy for the evaluation of the streamflow of the two selected river basins with a PC > 0.75 in both basins with both daily and monthly data. Even the 2-P model provided results with PC > 0.70 when used with monthly and daily data and within the acceptable range.","PeriodicalId":6603,"journal":{"name":"2018 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)","volume":"51 1","pages":"372-377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daily and Monthly Lumped Parameter Hydrologic Models for Analysis of Small Watersheds in Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"G. Perera, R. Rajapakse\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MERCON.2018.8421989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Water resource management has become vital with the increase of demand for fresh water and modelling of ungauged basins under the conditions of data scarcity has always been a challenge. The two-parameter (2-P) and four-parameter (4-P) models have been used in this study to simulate the response of two river basins Maha Oya and Kelani River in Sri Lanka in an attempt to investigate the potential of these lumped parameter models. Both daily and monthly rainfall and streamflow data sets have been used to evaluate the model performance. Two key performance indices, Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PC) and Mean Relative Error (MRE) have been used as objective functions to compare goodness of fit of the observed and simulated streamflow. The two models were calibrated and validated for 2011~2014 and 2008~2010 periods, respectively. Based on the comparison of the results, it was found that the 4-P model provides a greater accuracy for the evaluation of the streamflow of the two selected river basins with a PC > 0.75 in both basins with both daily and monthly data. Even the 2-P model provided results with PC > 0.70 when used with monthly and daily data and within the acceptable range.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"372-377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MERCON.2018.8421989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MERCON.2018.8421989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着对淡水需求的增加,水资源管理变得至关重要,在数据匮乏的情况下对未计量的盆地进行建模一直是一项挑战。本文采用两参数(2-P)和四参数(4-P)模型对斯里兰卡Maha Oya河和Kelani河两个流域的响应进行了模拟,试图探讨这些集总参数模型的潜力。使用日和月降雨量和河流流量数据集来评估模型的性能。用Pearson相关系数(PC)和平均相对误差(MRE)两个关键性能指标作为目标函数来比较观测和模拟水流的拟合优度。两个模型分别在2011~2014年和2008~2010年进行了标定和验证。结果表明,4-P模型在日数据和月数据下均能较好地评价两个流域的流量,且PC值均> 0.75。即使2-P模型在使用月、日数据时,其PC值也大于0.70,且在可接受范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Daily and Monthly Lumped Parameter Hydrologic Models for Analysis of Small Watersheds in Sri Lanka
Water resource management has become vital with the increase of demand for fresh water and modelling of ungauged basins under the conditions of data scarcity has always been a challenge. The two-parameter (2-P) and four-parameter (4-P) models have been used in this study to simulate the response of two river basins Maha Oya and Kelani River in Sri Lanka in an attempt to investigate the potential of these lumped parameter models. Both daily and monthly rainfall and streamflow data sets have been used to evaluate the model performance. Two key performance indices, Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PC) and Mean Relative Error (MRE) have been used as objective functions to compare goodness of fit of the observed and simulated streamflow. The two models were calibrated and validated for 2011~2014 and 2008~2010 periods, respectively. Based on the comparison of the results, it was found that the 4-P model provides a greater accuracy for the evaluation of the streamflow of the two selected river basins with a PC > 0.75 in both basins with both daily and monthly data. Even the 2-P model provided results with PC > 0.70 when used with monthly and daily data and within the acceptable range.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信